WIBTA if I told them no vaccine = no grandparent time?

A nursery sits ready, soft blankets folded, but tension brews like a storm on the horizon. A 30-weeks-pregnant woman, glowing with anticipation, lays down a firm rule: anyone meeting her newborn must have flu and TDAP vaccines. Her husband nods but winces, dreading family drama. His anti-vaxxer sister has swayed his parents against shots, and now they hesitate, threatening their grandparent privileges.

For this mom-to-be, it’s about shielding her baby from harm, not stirring conflict. Yet her husband calls her overprotective, and she’s fuming, feeling alone in prioritizing their son’s safety. Is she too strict, or is this a justified stand for her child’s health? Readers, step into this delicate dance of family ties and tough choices.

‘WIBTA if I told them no vaccine = no grandparent time?’

Protecting a newborn is like guarding a fragile flame, and this mom’s vaccine rule is a shield against real risks. Her in-laws’ hesitation, influenced by her anti-vaxxer sister-in-law, pits personal beliefs against medical consensus. Her husband’s reluctance to confront his family adds strain, framing her as the “bad guy” for prioritizing safety.

This taps into a broader issue: vaccine hesitancy in families. A 2023 CDC report notes that 25% of U.S. adults express vaccine skepticism, often fueled by misinformation, endangering vulnerable populations like infants. Newborns can’t receive TDAP until 2 months, making adult vaccinations critical.

Dr. Paul Offit, a pediatric infectious disease expert, states, “Vaccines like TDAP and flu shots are essential to protect infants from preventable diseases like whooping cough, which can be deadly.” Her stance is backed by science, not overreach. She could offer resources to educate her in-laws while holding firm.

Heres what people had to say to OP:

Reddit didn’t hold back, serving up fiery takes with a sprinkle of sass. Here’s what they had to say:

These bold opinions beg a cheeky question: are they right to rally behind her, or is there room for compromise in this family showdown?

This mom’s stand is a fierce act of love, placing her baby’s health above hurt feelings. Reddit’s “NTA” chorus backs her, but her husband’s hesitation leaves us pondering: when does protecting a child outweigh family harmony? Her rule isn’t about exclusion—it’s about survival in a world of preventable risks. Have you ever set a tough boundary for safety’s sake? What would you do in her shoes? Share your thoughts below!