WIBTA for not firing my soon to be ex-brother in law?
In a small office humming with ambition, a business owner finds himself caught in a family firestorm that threatens to scorch his professional principles. Seven years ago, he hired Paul, his sister Jen’s then-boyfriend, who’s since become a top employee. Now, as Paul and Jen navigate a bitter divorce marked by mutual wrongs, the owner’s family demands he fire Paul, claiming he “ruined” Jen’s life. Refusing to mix personal grudges with business, he stands firm, only to face accusations of betrayal from his sister and father.
This Reddit tale crackles with the tension of loyalty torn between family and fairness. Is he wrong to keep Paul employed, or is his family overstepping by dragging personal drama into his workplace? Let’s unpack this messy clash of duty and ethics.

‘WIBTA for not firing my soon to be ex-brother in law?’










Navigating family drama in a professional setting is like walking a tightrope over a pit of grudges, and this owner’s refusal to fire Paul keeps his balance—for now. Paul’s stellar work record stands apart from his personal failings, and firing him over a divorce where both parties share blame would blur the line between business and family feuds. The family’s pressure, as Reddit user G0r1ll4 notes, risks backfiring in divorce proceedings, where sabotaging income could reflect poorly.
A 2023 study by the Society for Human Resource Management found that 65% of small business owners face challenges separating personal relationships from workplace decisions. The owner’s stance aligns with ethical hiring practices, prioritizing performance over personal disputes.
Dr. Amy Edmondson, a leadership expert, states, “Fairness in the workplace requires clear boundaries between personal and professional judgments”. The owner’s refusal to fire Paul upholds this, but his family’s emotional demands, fueled by Jen’s pain, complicate matters. Their accusations of disloyalty overlook Paul’s contributions and the mutual fault in the divorce.
To resolve this, the owner could cite employment laws or company policy to his family, as suggested by a Reddit user, reinforcing his decision’s legality. A neutral discussion with Jen, acknowledging her hurt but emphasizing workplace fairness, might ease tensions.
Check out how the community responded:
Reddit’s crew didn’t hold back, tossing out wit and wisdom like a well-aimed dart. Here’s what the community had to say:













These sharp takes make you wonder—do they nail the ethics of the situation, or is there more to chew on about family versus business loyalty?
This story exposes the raw nerve of balancing family ties with professional integrity. The owner’s refusal to fire Paul honors fairness, but his family’s fury casts him as a traitor in their eyes. Is he right to stand by his employee, or should family loyalty tip the scales? What would you do if your family demanded you sacrifice a good worker for personal grudges? Share your thoughts—how do you keep business and family from colliding?

I would get a consultation with an employment lawyer before considering firing you B-I-L to avoid any legal reprecussions. If the lawyer gives the go ahead I would inform the family that your business will no longer hire any family and put it in your business hiring literature. Then at least give the poor guy a couple weeks severance, although I would be more inclined to keep a gpod employee.