My MIL called me and asked why I wasn’t calling her anymore. AITA?

Venus Hours
Comments 0 Comments

In a cozy living room, where laughter should reign, a woman’s playful banter with her husband was repeatedly drowned out by an unexpected guest: her mother-in-law’s stern voice. Like a hawk swooping in, the MIL pounced on every jest, turning lighthearted moments into awkward lectures about “protecting her son.” For the woman, these intrusions weren’t just annoying—they made her skin crawl, pushing her to dial back contact and retreat into silence.

This Reddit AITA gem dives into the messy dance of family boundaries and marital privacy. When the MIL called, questioning the woman’s distance, it revealed a deeper web of control and miscommunication. Caught between loyalty to her husband and her own peace, the woman’s choice to step back sparks a question: is she wrong to ghost her MIL, or is this a justified shield against relentless meddling?

‘My MIL called me and asked why I wasn’t calling her anymore. AITA?’

My mother-in-law (MIL) has always been fiercely protective of my husband, her only son. She’s the kind of person who sees him as her pride and joy, which I understand—except it often crosses into uncomfortable territory. Whenever my husband and I are joking around, she swoops in like a hawk, misinterpreting my playful remarks as threats.

For instance, one day I teased my husband, saying, “If you leave dishes in the sink again, I’ll end you!” We were both laughing, but my MIL, who was visiting, froze and launched into a lecture: “Please don’t hurt my son. He’s fragile, and I can’t bear the thought of anyone harming him.” Her tone was deadly serious, and I stood there, stunned, as the mood crashed.

This wasn’t a one-off. It happens every time we’re around her. If I so much as nudge my husband playfully or make a sarcastic comment, she jumps in to “defend” him, as if I’m some villain in her story. Once, I gently asked her to let us have our moment, saying, “We’re just joking; it’s how we connect.” Her response? “He’s my son, and I’ll always protect him.”

It felt like she was staking a claim over him, dismissing our marriage in the process. Each incident left me feeling alienated, like an outsider in my own relationship. My skin crawled at the thought of another tense visit, so I started pulling back. I stopped calling her, and we rarely visited her house.

Recently, my MIL called me out of the blue, her voice dripping with hurt. “Why don’t you talk to me anymore?” she asked. I was caught off guard. Part of me wanted to explain how her overbearing behavior pushed me away, but I didn’t know how to say it without sparking drama. Instead, I mumbled something vague and changed the subject.

Update: After her call, I sat down with my husband to clear the air. I was honest: “Your mom’s constant interference makes me resent her, and it’s worse because you don’t step in.” He admitted he’d been avoiding conflict, not realizing how much it hurt me. He promised to back me up moving forward, which felt like a weight off my shoulders.

Curious about his mom’s sudden call, I asked if he’d spoken to her. He revealed she’d been trying to reach him all day, but he was swamped and missed her calls. It clicked: her call to me wasn’t about rebuilding our relationship—it was a roundabout way to check on her son. She couldn’t admit she was worried about him, so she framed it as me neglecting her.

This MIL’s habit of leaping into her son’s marriage is a textbook boundary violation. Dr. Susan Forward, author of Toxic In-Laws, writes, “When in-laws overstep, it can erode a couple’s autonomy” (Psychology Today). The woman’s discomfort stems from her MIL’s refusal to see her as an equal partner, instead treating her like a threat to her “weak” son. This dynamic risks alienating the couple if left unchecked.

The woman’s attempt to address the issue directly was met with defiance, leaving distance as her only recourse. Her MIL’s call, ostensibly about her silence, was a thinly veiled bid for control, using guilt to reel her back in. The husband’s initial inaction didn’t help, but his promise to step up is a start. The woman’s retreat wasn’t spite—it was self-preservation.

This reflects a broader issue: in-law interference is a top marital stressor. A 2023 study by the American Psychological Association found 30% of couples report in-law conflicts impacting their relationship (APA). Dr. Forward suggests couples set firm boundaries together, like politely redirecting intrusive comments. The woman could calmly explain her need for space, reinforcing that her marriage is a private partnership.

For now, she should hold her ground, encouraging her husband to lead the charge with his mom. A united front, perhaps with a scripted response like, “We appreciate your care, but we handle our marriage together,” could reset expectations. Readers, what’s your take? Should she keep her distance or confront the MIL head-on?

Take a look at the comments from fellow users:

The Reddit squad rolled up with pitchforks and wisdom, ready to weigh in. Here’s the tea they spilled:

gabbage1 − Nta you’re entitled to create space. If she causes you to be annoyed in even casual conversation. I do wonder why she is saying he’s already weak - what’s up with that?

Alice_Da_Cat − NTA. Your husband needs to grow a set and stick up for you, she also needs to back off. If none of those things are going to happen you sadly need to decide if you're going to shut up and put up or leave,. Sorry this is happening OP <3

Quiet-Hamster6509 −

giuseppe_botsford − NTA. That constant interference would drive anyone crazy. It's your marriage not a committee. She needs to understand boundaries. Maybe your husband can try explaining things to her again? It's worth a shot

lovelyyhelena − NTA. You’re not obligated to maintain a relationship with someone who constantly disrespects your boundaries. MIL isn’t just defending her son she’s inserting herself into your marriage in a way that’s uncomfortable and dismissive.

You tried addressing it directly, and she refused to listen. Distance is a natural consequence, not a punishment. If she truly wants to reconnect, she needs to respect your role as his partner, not treat you like an outsider in your own relationship.

booksdogstravel − Your husband needs to create some boundaries with his mother. She is a big red flag.

Aggressive_Cup8452 − NtA. Not all MIL are created equal. Sounds like you got stuck with a meddling one. Best way to adress it is by ignoring her. . Protect your peace.

TopAd7154 − NTA. Reply with

mother-of-dragons13 − NTA She needs to step back. You're entitled to have a conversation without her jumping down your throat all time.. Your husband needs to grow a pair and tell her to back off.

Flimsy_Grocery_3227 − Tell her exactly why you don’t talk to her anymore. Even though she probably already knows

These opinions are fiery, but do they nail the truth, or are they just cheering from the sidelines?

This tale of a meddling MIL shows how quickly family love can turn into a tug-of-war over boundaries. The woman’s choice to step back wasn’t cold—it was a bid to protect her marriage and sanity. As she and her husband forge a united front, the path to peace lies in clarity, not conflict. What would you do if your in-law kept crashing your marriage? Share your stories—would you ghost, talk it out, or something else?

Share this post

Related Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *