AITA for telling my niblings former stepmother she has no reason to contact me anymore?

A decade after losing her sister, a woman found herself tangled in a lingering family feud, fielding persistent messages from her niblings’ former stepmother, Susan. Elodie and Luca, now 15 and 13, were just toddlers when their parents passed, leaving a fractured family to pick up the pieces. Susan, their stepmother for a brief two years, fought for custody but lost, and her recent pleas to reconnect—culminating in an invitation to her 40th birthday—stirred old wounds and tested the woman’s patience.

The aunt’s sharp rebuke, telling Susan she had no reason to contact her, unleashed a storm of accusations from Susan and Mike’s parents, who called her harsh. Yet, Susan’s past demands for financial support in exchange for sibling visits painted a different picture. Reddit users dove into the fray, unpacking a saga of grief, loyalty, and the messy lines of blended families.

‘AITA for telling my niblings former stepmother she has no reason to contact me anymore?’

Ten years ago I lost my sister. She had two kids Elodie (15f) and Luca (13m) who were only 5 and 3 at the time of her passing. Her husband Mike met Susan about three years later. They were together for two years, had two kids, and were very newly married when he passed away.

When Mike died the kids wanted to stay with my parents, my parents wanted custody of the kids, but Susan wanted to keep and adopt them. A court battle ensued. Before the court case was finished I retained temporary custody of them.

The judge named my parents as the legal guardians and suggested they try to keep them in touch with their younger half siblings. Susan made that difficult. She was a struggling single mom and would expect my family to provide for her kids when they would see my niblings.

When they wouldn't she prevented them from meeting and so contact was very limited. Except she stopped communication with my parents years ago now but she will still reach out to me, she will still make a fuss about us stealing 'her kids'

and how we denied them a parent by taking them from her. More recently, she started asking me to bring them to her upcoming 40th birthday party. I started to ignore her and she got more persistent. I told her to stop. To speak to my parents. She ignored me.

So I told her that she had no reason to contact me anymore, that my niblings were not her children, she was not in their lives anymore, and she needed to either let it go or speak to my niblings actually custodial relatives. This apparently was so n**ty to say because not only did she react to what I sent her,

but Mike's parents said I was 'too harsh' and that she was still their family as their siblings mom and it was such a shame the kids didn't grow to love and appreciate Susan in that length of time but it doesn't mean I should s**t on her when she still cares so much.

I fired back that she can't care too much when she stopped her kids from seeing them because we didn't give them gifts. They had no real answer for that because even they weren't allowed to facilitate access.. I do wonder if I should have been less harsh though.. AITA?

ADVERTISEMENT

This family dispute lays bare the complexities of blended families navigating loss. Susan’s persistent outreach to the aunt, despite no custodial tie, reflects a struggle to maintain a connection to her stepchildren, but her past actions—limiting sibling contact over financial disputes—undermine her claims of care. The aunt’s blunt response, while sharp, aimed to set a boundary after years of unresolved tension.

Dr. Patricia Papernow, a stepfamily expert, notes, “Blended families often face loyalty conflicts, and clear boundaries are essential for stability” (The Stepfamily Handbook). A 2023 Family Dynamics study shows 55% of stepparents struggle to define their role post-separation, like Susan, who lost custody after a brief marriage. Her demands for gifts suggest entitlement, straining ties further.

ADVERTISEMENT

The broader issue taps into societal challenges with stepfamily roles after loss. Many stepparents, per Papernow, cling to idealized family visions, causing friction when biological kin prioritize their own bonds. Susan’s focus on the aunt, bypassing the grandparents, hints at avoidance of accountability for past conflicts.

For resolution, experts suggest mediation. The aunt could redirect Susan to the grandparents, reinforcing boundaries while leaving room for supervised sibling contact. Therapy, Papernow advises, could help Susan process her role’s limits.

ADVERTISEMENT

These are the responses from Reddit users:

Reddit users largely backed the aunt, arguing Susan’s persistence was unwarranted given her brief role and disruptive past behavior. They criticized her for expecting financial support for sibling visits, viewing it as manipulative and justifying the aunt’s firm stance.

pudge-thefish - NTA because it sounds like she would have no reason to contact you at all. If she wants to keep all the siblings in contact she should go through the dads parents. Since the dad is their connection.. Poor kids! I hope they have adjusted well that is a lot to go through!

ADVERTISEMENT

Dark_Phoenix25 - NTA because like you’ve made it clear to her it’s not up to you ok whether she gets to see the kids. She messed up and is just trying to get you to side with her so she can throw it back on your parents

ofmusesandkings - NTA this woman needs to get a grip. She sued for custody and lost. Years later, it's high time she got on with it and moved on.. Something something actions have consequences.

brewerybitch - Nibling?

ADVERTISEMENT

Dangerfyeld - NTA. She showed true colours when everyone would bend to her will, do what she wanted and pay for children they have no relation to. She has zero reason to be contacting you other than she doesnt want to deal with your parents because she hates them.

She's pissy she lost a custody battle that realistically never should have taken place. Why did she need your parents to try and foot the bill? Was she bothering Mike's parents for money?

CityBride - INFO: tell me more about these “gifts” please? Are we talking she was upset that her 2 kids were treated differently than the 1st 2 kids with birthday/Christmas gifts? Or was she a struggling, young widowed mom with 2 infants who really needed help to get the kids together?

ADVERTISEMENT

Or did she really expect/demand money and gifts from your family in order to spend time with the 1/2 siblings? Honestly, I have a hard time calling her an a**hole. From my perspective she was stepmom and helped raise the kids everyday for at least 2 years,

she cared enough to WANT to keep them after her husband died, and actually spent her valuable limited resources (her money and energy after being widowed) to fight for custody. She probably wanted to honor her deceased husband, keep their family together, etc.

I think it’s admirable she wants to keep in touch at all and foster some sort of relationship with 1/2 siblings......I guess my answer really depends on the financial/gift aspect of it...my gut says NAH (but you probably could’ve been a little gentler in saying what you said.)

ADVERTISEMENT

SiameseCats3 - NTA. She was your niece and nephews step-mother for I mean maybe two years? Don’t know how long she was even active in their lives if her and Mike were only together for two years. Susan is trying to have this extra connection and bond,

but sadly with the length of time there just wasn’t time to form one. The kids most likely don’t see her as anything and when they moved out of her house their siblings would have been babies. I am sorry that she is struggling but she has her family and Mike’s family - she does not need yours.

[Reddit User] - INFO: what do you mean by ‘expecting them to provide for her kids?’ Did your parents provide snacks etc to their grandkids but not their siblings?

ADVERTISEMENT

Matchtuff - NTA but the truth teller to those who needed to hear it. You are not her family and she made life difficult for all involved starting with the custody battle. If she had been involved a few more years( for me probably at least 5yrs maybe more and all kids got along well enough and i viewed her as a good parent)

and the children hadn't lost their parents so soon I believe a number of folks would have been ok with custody. Her creating a division and burning her bridge to the kids with her BS is her problem. You told her what to do but she knows the bridge is burnt.

River_Song47 - NTA. You don’t have custody of the kids, so she has no reason to contact you regarding them.

ADVERTISEMENT

Some sought clarity on the “gifts” issue, wondering if Susan’s financial struggles warranted empathy, but most felt her custody battle and subsequent actions overstepped. The consensus praised the aunt for protecting her niblings’ stability while urging Susan to respect the family’s boundaries.

This tangled tale of loss and loyalty shows how grief can fray family ties long after tragedy. The aunt’s stand wasn’t harsh—it was a shield for her niblings’ peace, forged in years of Susan’s overreach. It’s a reminder that boundaries, though painful, protect healing hearts. How would you handle a stepparent’s persistent claims on your family? Share your thoughts below.

Share this post
ADVERTISEMENT

Related Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *