AITA for telling my cousin’s widow I will no longer be supporting her emotionally or physically?

In a close-knit family, a woman’s 18-month labor of love—supporting her cousin’s grieving widow and four young kids—hit a breaking point. Exhausted from raising the children, covering rent, and being an emotional anchor, she demanded the widow seek therapy within a week or face losing her support, including potential custody of the kids. The family’s outcry, calling her cruel, clashes with her plea for the widow to step up for her children.

This Reddit saga unravels a raw struggle of compassion and limits, where grief’s heavy shadow tests family bonds. The woman’s ultimatum, born of frustration, aims to jolt a stalled widow into action, but risks fracturing ties. With kids’ futures and emotions at stake, this story pulls readers into a drama of tough love and tangled hearts.

‘AITA for telling my cousin’s widow I will no longer be supporting her emotionally or physically?’

I(32f) am from a small, tight knit family. There is my family of 4, my parents, my grandmother, my aunt and uncle, their two kids and families. We all live in the same area and will do whatever we can to help eachother. My cousin, Derek(28m) tragically passed away a year and a half ago from a drunk driver.

ADVERTISEMENT

He left behind his wife, Monica(27f) and 4 kids, all under the age of 8. It was devastating and Monica completely shut down. We all understood and started caring for her and the kids. This included me no longer charging her rent(they lived in a house I own, next door to me), helping prepare meals, taking care of the kids, helping with appointments, school work, shopping, ect.

I can't tell you how many times I was her shoulder to cry on. She let me put the kids in therapy but refused to go herself. On to the now and the issue. As I said, it's been a year and a half... and she is still completely shut down. She doesn't work, she doesn't cook or clean, and I have been raising the kids along with my 2. This isn't sustainable. The kids miss her.

They lost their mom the day they lost their dad. I sat her down the other night and was trying to be empathetic towards her but nothing was getting thru. She just kept crying and saying she couldn't do it without Derek. I told her she doesn't have a choice. She has 4 kids who need their mother.

She still wasn't listening but I had enough. I told her she has a week to get an appointment with a therapist before I stop supporting her and went for custody of the kids. She ran out crying. The rest of our family thinks I'm being cruel because she loved my cousin deeply but I think this is what she needs. She can't live like this and can't keep putting her kids thru this!

ADVERTISEMENT

Supporting a grieving widow for 18 months is an extraordinary act of kindness, but this woman’s ultimatum—therapy or lose support—reflects the unsustainable toll of her cousin’s wife’s inaction. The widow’s prolonged shutdown, neglecting her four kids under 8, suggests pathological grief or depression, which therapy could address. The cousin’s role as de facto parent, landlord, and emotional crutch, while compassionate, has enabled the widow’s stagnation, harming the children who need their mother.

The ultimatum, though harsh, aims to prioritize the kids’ well-being, echoing the cousin’s exhaustion and the children’s emotional loss. Dr. Alan Wolfelt, a grief expert, notes, “Unresolved grief can trap survivors, but gentle accountability can spur healing.” The widow’s refusal to seek help, despite offers to facilitate therapy, shifts some responsibility to her, though her trauma may cloud her ability to act. The family’s accusation of cruelty overlooks the cousin’s immense sacrifices and the kids’ urgent needs.

The cousin’s threat to seek custody, while drastic, underscores her commitment to the children, but it risks escalating conflict. A softer approach—setting small, achievable goals like daily interaction with the kids, as suggested by Reddit’s death care professional—could complement the therapy push. Her frustration mirrors your past irritation when family pressured you to share despite your brother’s carelessness, highlighting the strain of unreciprocated efforts.

ADVERTISEMENT

To move forward, the cousin should extend the deadline, arrange a therapist appointment herself, and involve family to share the load, ensuring the kids’ stability. This story underscores the delicate balance of supporting grief while setting boundaries, urging empathy and action to protect vulnerable children and preserve family ties.

Let’s dive into the reactions from Reddit:

Reddit users largely supported the cousin, praising her for 18 months of selfless help and calling her ultimatum a necessary wake-up call. They argued the widow’s neglect of her kids, despite support, justifies tough love, and therapy is a reasonable condition. Many criticized the family’s “cruel” label, noting their absence in sharing the burden, and urged them to step up or support the cousin’s stance.

ADVERTISEMENT

Some acknowledged the widow’s deep grief, suggesting depression or trauma, and recommended gentler nudges like scheduling therapy or setting small goals. They agreed the kids’ needs come first, supporting potential custody action if the widow remains unresponsive. The debate reflects the tension between compassion for grief and accountability for parenting.

GuiltyPick − NTA. You’ve given it a year and a half and whilst there is no time limit on grief, she needs a reality check. You’ve not said anything crazy, just go see a therapist at least. You’ve already tried that, and it didn’t work. You gave it time, but now’s the time for an ultimatum. Her kids need her now. Where are all of the rest of the families help?

ADVERTISEMENT

WanderGoldfinch − Hi, death care professional here! Being stuck in the mourning (which is how your grief is outwardly displayed) is very difficult. And grief (the emotions surrounding a loss) can often mask depression... The two play off each other as well and have lots of similarities. It's common for one to flow into the other.

Something that might help (in addition to therapy) is to set and enforce obtainable goals. Easy goals to start. When you're deep in the malaise it can be difficult to accept that you can in fact accomplish things. Everything can seem overwhelming. Explain to her that you know this is hard and you will continue to be there for her.

ADVERTISEMENT

But hard doesn't mean impossible and living means continuing on. She's alive, her kids are alive, and they need to live well because that's exactly what she and her husband (bless him) planned out for themselves prior to his death. That plan doesn't stop/end just because he isn't here physically to help her with it.

So, first goal. Get out of bed each morning to say 'good morning' to the kids. She doesn't need to shower, she doesn't need to help with breakfast, she simply needs to get up on time each day to start the day with her family. That's it.. And then when that's easier, she says good morning and makes breakfast for the kids..

ADVERTISEMENT

And then when that's easier, she showers, gets dressed, says good morning, and makes breakfast for the kids. Routine after loss is its own kind of therapy. For everyone. This may seem silly but she's in it deep. So give her baby steps. Encourage therapy. Encourage the baby steps. These are acceptable boundaries for your own mental/emotional well-being as well as that of her children.

Helping someone after a death isn't always cooking, cleaning, or being a shoulder to cry on. A lot of the time it's enforcing boundaries and holding people accountable for their actions (or inactions). That doesn't mean she isn't allowed to continue mourning or grieving... It means she needs to continue to live through those things and find healthy ways to adjust to his absence.

ADVERTISEMENT

And it isn't punitive. These things are for you just as much as they are for her and her children. You seem incredibly compassionate but it's healthy to set expectations and boundaries when caring for someone.

Therapy can help her find the tools to process the loss in a healthy way but baby steps can help you have tools for this family going forward too. They're just different types of tools. And hopefully your tools will get her to start each day by saying 'good morning'.

ADVERTISEMENT

AikaNemo − NTA You making her go see a therapist makes sense. Plus, it is not only about her, but about her kids who need her. She needs to reconstruct, but you need her to play a real part in the project. You have done loads for her and her kids - but please don't let the kids down if the mother fails to have therapy.

catskilkid − NTA Since it's a tight knit family and they disagree with your approach, they all can step up and take care of the 4 kids and start paying her rent. I mean they don't want to be AH's do they? It's easy to call you an AH when you do everything. It's very sad what occurred, but 1 1/2 years later is not 'rushing' this.

ADVERTISEMENT

With her shut down, she has to decide what she is going to do for those children which should be THE MOST important thing. Tough love is tough, but this situation is not your fault and she is not helping but sticking her head in the sand. Good luck to you and the children and ultimately your SIL.

DarkLord_Taken − NTA One and half years is a lot of time to support someone. I understand people try to grieve in different ways and your cousin's widow is still struggling. But sooner or later she has to start caring for her children and for that she needs to get therapy.

You are not withholding support completely. It is time for you to behave in the best interests of the children.. You are just showing some tough love. And one day I hope she appreciates it.

idreaminwords − The rest of our family thinks I'm being cruel because she loved my cousin deeply but I think this is what she needs.. Then where are they with the rent payments and virtually 24 hour care of the four kids?

ADVERTISEMENT

NTA. You have been more than supportive and understanding. And you're not even unilaterally cutting off your support; you're just making the ultimatum that she needs to get therapy, which is something she should have done a year and a half ago.

SportyJesus − NTA. She’ll thank you once she’s on the other side of all of this:)

ADVERTISEMENT

Equilibriyum − NTA. You did and are doing the right thing. She needs therapy, should have been this whole time, and she needs to be a Mother again. Your family sounds like they're enabling her. Has she developed a drink or substance abuse issue? I ask because it happens to the surviving spouse often when a tragedy like this occurs.

I saw it in my own family. And everyone enabled that person to no end, until they ended up with ulcers and DTs. If she is neglectful and mentally incapable of caring for her children physically and emotionally, you or someone needs to take custody.

ADVERTISEMENT

You'll get their payments from the Fed which will cover about 1/4-1/2 each of their individual financial needs. The rest will have to come out of your pocket, so custody is a big step. Good luck.

[Reddit User] − NAH. Monica is clearly suffering from depression and trauma, and needs help -- it may be near impossible for her to fully realize this in the course of a single conversation 'wake up call.' You're NTA for wanting to make sure she can get help, be financially and emotionally stable for herself and the kids.

ADVERTISEMENT

Ultimatums are challenging. You're not wrong for wanting her to self support, but you may need to give her a list of therapists who deal with trauma/loss of loved ones who are available and taking new patients, and even driving her to the appointment.

With a bit of compassion and gentle pushing (vs. a hard shove), she might be able to start turning the gears to get help. Depriving four small children of their mother after losing their father would hardly be the best outcome for all concerned, especially and including you.

ADVERTISEMENT

EDIT: It does sound like OP has offered to drive to therapy, pay for it etc. I would suggest OP actually make an appointment with a family counselor, which includes her/Monica and eventually the kids, and start the gears. Someone this depressed and basically unwilling to live might actually need someone to force the beginning of changes.

DazzleLove − Grief is normal- 2 years of severe grief is normal for loss of a spouse. It would only be the 6-12 month mark that she’d be reasonable to see a therapist. Yes, it’s excessive that she’s done nothing for her kids that long

ADVERTISEMENT

but when I did psych, I had to assess way too many people marched in by loved ones a few days post loss and we had to explain grief isn’t a mental illness. There is a phenomenon called pathological grief, and she likely does fit that diagnosis, but sudden death of a young person is really hard to process

and I speak as someone whose parent died at a youngish age in a similar way. She has been fortunate to have the support she has had, and it’s unreasonable to expect it to continue. I’m not against OP, she’s done above and beyond, and it’s likely doing the widow no favours allowing her to continue to do nothing job and children wise.

ADVERTISEMENT

However, I just wanted to say, in response to some comments that grief, particularly post sudden death, takes a lot longer than the non-bereaved realise. It’s not just the loss of her partner, her future and that of her children has been torn away. She may have ptsd from the accident, even if not present.

This family’s saga shows how grief can strain even the tightest bonds, with a cousin’s ultimatum drawing a line for the sake of kids. Her stand, though tough, seeks to save a widow from drowning in sorrow—but at what cost? Softer steps and shared family effort might bridge the gap. How would you balance supporting a grieving loved one with protecting their kids? Share your thoughts below—let’s keep this heartfelt debate alive!

ADVERTISEMENT
Share this post
ADVERTISEMENT

Related Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *