AITA for refusing to pay for my bf’s food and his birthday and getting him banned from a restaurant?

A candlelit dinner at a fancy restaurant should scream romance, but for one young couple, it turned into a sizzling standoff. An 18-year-old vegetarian, steadfast in her moral code, faced a birthday blowout with her 20-year-old boyfriend, John, when he ordered a pricey steak and expected her to foot the bill. Her refusal sparked a dramatic exit, leaving the restaurant staff—and their relationship—in the lurch. This tale of principles and plates unravels a classic question: where do personal boundaries end and partnership expectations begin?

The tension at the table wasn’t just about the steak; it was a clash of values, communication, and assumptions. Readers might feel the heat of her frustration, caught between her unwavering ethics and a boyfriend’s birthday entitlement. This Reddit story, buzzing with community reactions, invites us to dig into the messy dynamics of love, money, and meat.

‘AITA for refusing to pay for my bf’s food and his birthday and getting him banned from a restaurant?’

I (18f) have been dating my boyfriend, John (20m) for a little under a year. We have a pretty toxic free relationship but there’s quite a bit of tension when it comes to me being vegetarian. I’ve been vegetarian since 11 and I have very strict morals around it.

The one thing John has a problem with is me refusing to spend my money on meat. Ever since I started making my own money, I swore to myself that I would never spend a cent of it on meat. On our dates, we usually spilt the bill and sometimes he pays for it all. I told him if he orders something meat-free, I’d happily pay for both of us but he never does.

When he pays for my food, it’s when I’ve spend money on the activity. Normally concerts and festivals. That’s me paying €120+ on tickets and him spending maybe €50 on food. His birthday was a few days ago and we went out for dinner at his favourite fancy restaurant. He got the most expensive steak they had along with a side salad and a bottle of wine.

When we finished our food, I asked the waiter to spilt the bill and John looked at me shocked. He asked if I was joking and I said no. Then he told me he thought I was going to pay since it was his birthday and he didn’t budget for the meal. I asked him why he thought I’d pay since I’ve been very clear about my rule but he couldn’t give me a reason other than it being his birthday.

I told him I’d pay for the wine and the side salad, but he’d need to pay for the steak. He was furious with me and stormed off to the bathroom. I paid for my meal, the wine and the salad and waited for him to come back. He didn’t. After waiting for 20 minutes, I left. I found him sitting on a bench near where we parked the car.

I asked him why he left and reminded him he needed to pay. He looked shocked when I said that and asked me if I didn’t pay. I told him I’d paid for everything but the meat and he lost it. He started yelling at me, telling me I was selfish, that I needed to grow up. I stayed calm and told him he needed to go back and pay. He scoffed and walked away.

ADVERTISEMENT

I ended up driving home without him. Now he’s saying it’s my fault that he can’t show his face in his favourite restaurant since he dined and ditched. It’s a pretty small restaurant so he’d 100% be recognised and kicked out.. So, aita?

EDIT: To the people commenting about me not “treating” him on his birthday, yes, I did. I even dipped into my savings for his present.. EDIT 2: I did not “take him out” for dinner. He was the one that suggested it.

ADVERTISEMENT

This birthday dinner debacle reveals how unspoken expectations can sour even the sweetest occasions. Relationships thrive on clear communication, especially when values like vegetarianism are non-negotiable. The OP’s firm stance on not funding meat clashed with John’s assumption of a free birthday meal, highlighting a disconnect that could’ve been avoided with a quick pre-dinner chat.

Dr. John Gottman, a renowned relationship expert, notes in his book The Seven Principles for Making Marriage Work, “Couples who openly express their needs and negotiate differences respectfully are more likely to build lasting trust” . Here, the OP’s clarity about her vegetarian principles was consistent, but John’s failure to discuss his expectations beforehand set the stage for conflict. His dramatic bathroom exit and dine-and-dash move suggest an attempt to pressure her, which backfired spectacularly.

ADVERTISEMENT

This situation reflects a broader issue: navigating financial boundaries in relationships. A 2023 study by the Pew Research Center found that 41% of couples cite money as a major source of tension . The OP’s rule about not paying for meat, while unusual, is her prerogative. John’s choice to order extravagantly without confirming her willingness to pay shows a lack of mutual respect. Couples can avoid such pitfalls by setting clear financial expectations early, perhaps over a less expensive coffee date.

For the OP, standing firm was a bold move, but it’s worth reflecting on compatibility. If John’s meat-eating habits and financial assumptions persist, deeper discussions about shared values are crucial. Apologizing to the restaurant and settling the bill could also mend the damage, as suggested by some Redditors. Respecting each other’s boundaries while finding compromise—like splitting bills equitably—can keep future dinners from turning into drama.

Here’s the comments of Reddit users:

The Reddit crew didn’t hold back, serving up a feast of opinions with a side of sass. From calling out John’s red flags to questioning the couple’s future, the comments were a lively mix of support and shade. Here’s the raw take from the crowd:

BabyCake2004 − NTA. Ignoring the vegetarian stuff, who the f**k orders the most expensive steak possible and then expects their partner to pay for them without having checked prior. And then storming off to the bathroom expecting that to pressure you into paying for it. Op I hope you can see all the huge red flags here.

ADVERTISEMENT

GothPenguin − NTA-For refusing to pay for his steak. Y T A to yourself for staying with someone who acts like this and treats you so poorly.

ParsimoniousSalad − NTA. He thought he had you trapped into paying for meat. Good for you for sticking up for yourself and your boundaries.

shecho18 − ESH. you both sound obnoxious.

ADVERTISEMENT

BigBayesian − You hold a very unusual moral position. You are deeply opposed to the consumption of meat, to the point where you will not allow your money to be spent on it. But you have no problem with a life partner who frequently eats meat in front of you, as long as you don’t pay for it. This is an unusual place to draw the line.

I mention it because you may wish to reconsider your position before it makes things very uncomfortable (for example, if you were to marry a meat-eater, upon marriage you’d have shared income and assets. Does that mean that until marriage they can eat meat, but afterwards, they can only eat it if family money doesn’t pay for it?

You’re gonna be pushing your spouse to set up a lot of meat dates with friends, in that case)…. But your position is unusual, not immoral. Anyhow, you’re wondering if you’re an AH for what you did to John. You’re not. You made your position clear, and at no point did you tell him “I’m taking you out to dinner” (if you did, this was a big omission from your post).

ADVERTISEMENT

Because of this, it was unreasonable for him to assume that you were paying. It became even less reasonable after you asked for a split check. At that point, John left, in an effort to force you to pay even though you made your position clear. You didn’t, and so he effectively stole his food. Now he’s left with the consequences of those choices.

While I find your rules odd, I don’t find them confusing, and presumably neither does John. You acted in an extremely principled, predictable way. If John doesn’t wish to be treated like someone who leaves restaurants without paying, perhaps he shouldn’t leave restaurants without paying. I’ve never read the relevant legal statutes, but I suspect there’s no birthday exception.. NTA

Throwawayiea − I won't give you an answer because clearly this is a relationship that won't have a future.

ADVERTISEMENT

CakeEatingRabbit − Who even does that? Going to a fancy restaurant and ordering the most expensive steak and simply expecting their 18 SO to pay? I grew up middle class and as I was young, I didnt have that kind of money plus a gift.

[Reddit User] − NTA but why are you with him? the bar is on the floor.

GiovanniVanBroekhoes − The whole dine and dash thing he can fix, he just needs to go back to the restaurant. Tell them it was an emergency/mistake and pay for it. I have walked out of places before when I thought I had paid or someone else has and gone back when I realized. It's always been fine.

ADVERTISEMENT

Full-String7137 − NTA. You've been clear on your stance from the beginning. He was just hoping the situation would be so awkward you'd cave.

These Redditors rallied behind the OP’s principles but raised eyebrows at John’s tantrum. Some saw his dine-and-dash as a dealbreaker; others wondered if the couple’s values could ever align. But do these spicy takes capture the full picture, or are they just stirring the pot?

This vegetarian-versus-steak showdown serves up a hearty lesson in communication and respect. The OP’s commitment to her values clashed with John’s birthday expectations, leaving a sour taste and a restaurant ban. Relationships require navigating these tricky moments with honesty and compromise, but where do you draw the line? The OP stood her ground, but at what cost to their bond? What would you do if your partner’s assumptions clashed with your core beliefs? Share your thoughts and experiences below!

ADVERTISEMENT
Share this post
ADVERTISEMENT

Related Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *