AITA for refusing to let my ex’s wife take my kids to a mother-kids camping because she’s not their mother?

A 25-year-old single mom stood her ground when her ex’s wife, Adria, asked to take her 4-year-old twins to a church-run “mommy-kids” camp. Despite liking Adria, the mom feels she oversteps by pushing to be called “Mama,” enforcing religious practices, and criticizing the twins for playing with toys typically associated with the other gender. Even after discussions, Adria’s request to attend the camp as their “mom” sparked a firm no, leading to accusations that the mom’s stance could harm the kids’ bond with their stepmom.

Is the mom too rigid in protecting her role, or is Adria crossing lines? The story has fueled lively online debates about stepparent boundaries and parental rights. What would you do in this tricky family dynamic?

‘AITA for refusing to let my ex’s wife take my kids to a mother-kids camping because she’s not their mother?’

OP and her ex share 4-year-old twins, who live mostly with her due to his past work travel:

My(25F) ex (27M) and I have a pair of twins (4 M&F), we never married but my ex and I agreed that it was better if the kids spent more...

Adria, the ex’s new wife, insists on being called “Mama” and pushes religious beliefs on the twins:

She's quite nice and I actually like her, but she's too intrusive regarding our kids, she doesn't like to be called 'Adda'' (that's how they call her) and believes that...

she also imposes they beliefs and tries to take them to church and pray every night even when the kids refuse and my ex and I have told her that...

and let them choose on their own when they grow up (my ex is catholic but he had a hard time accepting religion into his life since his family tried...

She also disapproves of the twins playing with toys not tied to traditional gender roles:

She also scolds my kids if they are interested in ''things for the other s__'', since they are a girl and a boy they are usually playing with each other...

there're sometimes when they do those things on their own and neither my ex or I see any problem with that, they're just kids playing with toys, every town in...

ADVERTISEMENT

After being asked to adjust, Adria improved slightly but still proposed taking the twins to a church “mommy-kids” camp:

After we sat her down and told her all of this her behavior has improved a little, I know she still doesn't agrees with us, but she let them be....

I asked what kind of camp and she said that it was the ''mommy-kids bonding'' camp that the church was advertising, I immediately said no and that she wasn't her...

ADVERTISEMENT

She gave me a bad eye and left with the babies, but now is sending me messaged telling me that if my kids grows up hating her it'll be my...

OP worries that her stance might cause issues but stands firm on key boundaries:

I've been told before that I'm not prone to let her fit into the motherly role and that'll cause problems in the future, I always say that's because she's not...

ADVERTISEMENT

but I'm starting to think that maybe that's something bad? She still have a say in lots of things, but I don't think she should do it regarding religion and...

OP’s story highlights the delicate balance of co-parenting with a stepparent in the mix. Adria’s push to be called “Mama,” enforce religious practices, and impose gender norms on the 4-year-old twins disregards the clear boundaries set by OP and her ex. Refusing the “mommy-kids” church camp was a justified move, as it not only involved religion—against the parents’ wishes—but also positioned Adria as the twins’ mother, undermining OP’s role. Her insistence, despite prior discussions, shows a lack of respect for the parents’ authority.

Psychologically, stepparents often struggle to find their place, as Patricia Papernow notes: “Stepparents must navigate carefully, supporting without overstepping” (Surviving and Thriving in Stepfamily Relationships). Adria’s attempts to act as a primary parent, rather than a supportive stepmom, risk alienating the twins by forcing a bond prematurely. Her blaming OP for potential distance shifts responsibility from her own boundary-crossing behavior, which could confuse or pressure the young children.

ADVERTISEMENT

The ex-husband’s role is critical but seems underplayed. His agreement with OP on avoiding religion and gender stereotypes is a strong foundation, yet he needs to firmly reinforce these boundaries with Adria. His apparent leniency allows her to persist, potentially destabilizing the twins’ sense of security. OP’s protective stance is valid, but she might consider softer ways to affirm her role while fostering the twins’ comfort with Adria as a stepparent.

Going forward, OP and her ex should hold a direct conversation with Adria, clarifying that she can build a relationship with the twins but must respect parental decisions. Letting the twins choose what to call her, like “Adda,” supports their autonomy. Family counseling could help navigate these dynamics, ensuring the twins feel secure. OP should stay confident in safeguarding her children’s freedom to explore their identities and beliefs, prioritizing their emotional well-being over Adria’s desires.

Take a look at the comments from fellow users:

The online community strongly backed OP, criticizing Adria for overstepping her role as a stepmom. Here’s what they said:

ADVERTISEMENT

Most agreed Adria is wrong to push a maternal role and disregard parental boundaries:

[Reddit User] − “NTA - I don't think you have to let your kids go to one of those indoctrination centers. They offer those just to start the brainwashing early.

But as a divorced parent my advice would be to let the kids decide what to call her. She will never replace you but you do risk alienating your kids...

ADVERTISEMENT

MrsJonesy2012 − “NTA Your kids will hate her anyway for forcing the relationship, forcing them to call her Mama, go to church, forcing them to pray etc.

The 'things for the other s__' is soo weird. She's damaging their relationship. You're protecting your children. What is your ex doing in all this? He needs to step up...

LeedobeedoAdhd − “NTA on the fact that it’s a church sponsored event. She’s choosing to disregard both yours and your ex’s boundaries for YOUR children.”

ADVERTISEMENT

moonebeam − “NTA. You and your ex have agreed admirably on how to co-parent your babies, and Adria wants to insert herself into that agreement and start changing things to...

You were right to refuse to let her take them to a church camp; it doesn't even matter that it was a ‘mother-child’ camp (although that is certainly concerning). This...

Outside-Question − “NTA. Shes trying to force herself as the children's mothers despite yours and your ex's choice. She will end up with a bad relationship with them and it...

ADVERTISEMENT

SpectacularTurtle − “NTA. She is repeatedly trying to push herself into the role of a replacement mother (as opposed to a stepmom) and force her own values on your kids...

You need to have a talk with your ex and remind him that you've already discussed her forcing her religion on them and pretending to be their mother, so the...

Several emphasized that Adria should build her own bond without overstepping:

ADVERTISEMENT

ondinemonsters − “Absolutely NTA - I’m the ‘Adria’ in our family. And this chick is pushing herself on those babies. Her primary relationship is with their Dad. Not them. Will...

But the way the kids view her and what they call her should be THEIR decision. And she NEEDS to respect the choices their parents (you and Dad) have made...

I could name a half dozen things I’d do differently if my step-sons were my biological sons. But they aren’t. And as the step parent, it’s my job to back...

ADVERTISEMENT

HopelessVetTech − “Lord she needs to dial it back. If the kids end up hating her, it certainly won't be because of anything you've done. She's pushing way too damn...

ForwardPlenty − “NTA The whole step-parent thing is a constant mine field. The best thing for step parents to do is to err on the side of caution, don't push...

but if done too early then it can cause problems and resentment as the kid perceives their mother being pushed out of the picture, which upsets them. I would stay...

ADVERTISEMENT

Some suggested letting the twins define their relationship with Adria while upholding key boundaries:

aaliceb − “NTA. Would be careful with her, you've told her no a bunch of times and she doesn't care.”

ADVERTISEMENT

aeteci_ − “NTA. I see her point in wanting to be a part of the kid's life. And I think she will and should be because she is your ex's...

But she is crossing several lines in not following the given restrictions from both, you and your ex. In regards of this camp, I absolutely understand your decision. It's clearly...

[Reddit User] − “NTA - but whether she’s in a motherly role, or the kids call her mama adda or whatever should be up to the kids and what they’re...

ADVERTISEMENT

Just like you’re doing with religion you should also be doing with their relationship with their stepmom. Their father needs to handle the weird religion and gender stuff. The more...

Nervous-Internal-610 − “NTA- she is over stepping her role as a step mother and is continuing the with the whole religion thing via a different avenue. I’d let the kids...

Particular_Ad_5675 − “NTA for not wanting them to go but it seems to me that the real reason is you don’t trust her. I wouldn’t either.”

ADVERTISEMENT

OP’s story underscores the challenges of navigating stepparent roles in a co-parenting dynamic. Adria’s push to act as a mother and impose her beliefs on the twins crosses clear boundaries, justifying OP’s refusal to allow the church camp. While Adria fears a strained bond with the kids, her disregard for parental decisions is the real issue. Should OP soften her stance to foster the twins’ relationship with Adria, or keep defending her role as their mom? What would you do in her place? Share your thoughts below!

Share this post

Related Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *