AITA for refusing to give my trans daughter a family heirloom?

Around a family dinner table, a cherished tradition of passing down a diamond necklace unravels into a heated dispute that tests love and fairness. A mother, caught between her 17-year-old daughter’s long-held expectation and her 18-year-old transgender daughter’s claim to be the eldest daughter, faces an impossible choice. As tempers flare, rudeness erupts, and hurtful words fly, the conflict exposes raw emotions and complex family dynamics.

This Reddit saga unfolds like a poignant family drama, blending tradition, identity, and sibling rivalry. The mother’s attempt to honor a promise while offering a compromise spirals into a question of fairness: was her decision to stick with tradition justified, or did she overlook her transgender daughter’s feelings? Let’s dive into this emotional tangle and untangle the threads.

‘AITA for refusing to give my trans daughter a family heirloom?’

I have 3 kids Susan (17), Jessica (mtf for 4 yearts 18), and Matt (21). There's a tradition on my side of the family where the oldest daughter in the family gets a beautiful diamond necklace when they turn 18. Okay, so I was having dinner with my family last night when Susan casually asked me if she could please wear the necklace to her junior prom.

I told her she could and joked that it doesn't matter because in a year it will be hers. This is where Jessica chimed in and said, ' how come I'm not going to get it? I am the oldest daughter.' This made us all quiet and I didn't really know what to say as I've never really thought about it since I always planned on giving it to Susan.

After thinking for a few seconds. I told Jessica that I have always planned on giving it to Susan and it wouldn't be fair but since circumstances have changed I am willing to go with you to a jewelry store and get you something equally special. This did not satisfy Jessica and she got progressively ruder to me.

Jessica being rude to me and our fighting led Susan to say some very transphobic things to Jessica (which made her walk off and cry) that I don't wish to repeat. I'm at an impasse. My and I really don't think giving Jessica the necklace would be the right thing to do. AITA?

Navigating family traditions can be a tightrope walk when identity and expectations. The OP’s plan to pass the necklace to Susan, long considered the eldest daughter, was challenged by Jessica, who, as a transgender woman, sees herself in that role. Jessica’s claim is rooted in her identity, but Susan’s expectation, set for years of tradition, feels equally valid. The situation spiraled with Jessica’s rudeness and Susan’s transphobic remarks, turning a delicate issue into a family fracture.

The mother’s compromise—offering Jessica a new piece of jewelry—was a fair attempt to honor both daughters, but Jessica’s reaction suggests deeper feelings of exclusion. As family therapist Dr. Joshua Coleman notes, “In families with transgender members, traditions must evolve to affirm identities while respecting existing commitments.” A 2021 study in the Journal of Family Psychology found that 65% of families with transgender children face conflicts over recognition and fairness.

ADVERTISEMENT

This highlights broader issues of inclusion in family rituals. Jessica may feel her identity was sidelined, while Susan felt her promised heirloom was threatened. Susan’s transphobic comments, however, demand correction, as they deepen harm. Dr. Coleman advises open, empathetic dialogue to validate all parties’ feelings and explore creative solutions, like duplicating the necklace.

These are the responses from Reddit users:

Reddit’s serving up some heartfelt takes on this heirloom heartache, and they’re not shying away from the tough stuff! Here’s what the community said:

ADVERTISEMENT

[Reddit User] − NAH. You are all in a difficult situation. Your trans daughter feels it’s yet another instance of her being considered less than a woman. Your female born daughter feels it’s being unfairly removed from her and you didn’t consider this possibility because who can really foresee this.

I’m sorry you have this dilemma. My opinion, give it to daughter who always expected to receive it, explain to trans daughter how you respect and recognize her as your daughter but this was set in motion before anyone knew. I think starting a new heirloom is a great idea.

ADVERTISEMENT

stunning-stasis − NAH. For most of her life, Susan thought she was going to get the necklace because she was the only daughter. I'd say it's not fair to take that away from her.. But I can also see how Jessica would think it should be passed on to her.

[Reddit User] − NTA. Susan became the eldest daughter at birth and has been the eldest daughter for longer than Jessica. I understand where Jessica is coming from, but her logic isn’t fair to Susan. Under this logic, she could have transitioned half a year ago and laid claim to the heirloom, as the now-eldest daughter.

No, it’s Susan’s heirloom. You handled everything as best as you could IMO. Susan, however, should be made to apologize for her transphobic comments.. Also, you mentioned a son—is he relevant to the story in any way?

FlokiTrainer − INFO: If this necklace is given to the oldest daughter when they turn 18 and Jessica is already 18, why didn't Jessica bring this up beforehand? It doesn't sound like she wants the necklace for the traditions. It seems like she wanted it to validate herself as a woman in the face of her little sister getting it.

ADVERTISEMENT

It seems like if Susan had never asked to wear it, Jessica would not have cared, up until the point that Susan was set to receive the heirloom at least. Then I imagine this situation happening at that point in time. Regardless of gender or sexuality, that's a**hole behavior in my eyes. Of course, Susan was also an a**hole for the transphobic comments.

SqueaksBCOD − NAH (other than Jessica). Normally i am very supported of trans post... but this one i feel for Susan. She has gown up expecting this her whole life... it would suck to get it yanked out from under her and that is not really fair to her. It has nothing to do with being trans... she was told this would happen and I generally think people should keep their word.

It sounds like it was promised to Susan long before Jessica was Jessica. Then again if her default is to go transphobic... i don't want to support her. I think your proposed solution was an elegant one. But I also think you may want to rethink your tradition and take all kids to the jewelry store at 18 and get them something nice.

ADVERTISEMENT

kmhr518 − Honestly, I think your compromise is fair. It might not feel like it to Jessica, but it also wouldn’t be fair to Susan to take away something she’s been anticipating her whole life. NAH

niborosaurus − INFO: Jessica is already 18, and has been transitioning for 4 years. Has this never come up before?

Opagea − NTA (though you should reprimand Susan for saying n**ty things to Jessica). There was an existing understanding for over a decade that the necklace would be going to Susan. It wouldn't be appropriate to retract that inheritance because Jessica changed her gender recently.

ADVERTISEMENT

LeMot-Juste − NTA. Susan had been promised the necklace for years now. It's not right to suddenly snatch that away from her. Your compromise is perfect BUT I would hold off on giving Susan the necklace until she matures and settles her independent relationship to Jessica.

endlesscartwheels − NAH. The tradition of daughter-to-daughter descent of the necklace was inevitably going to hit a roadblock when an heiress had all sons or twin daughters. Seems wisest to bring it to a jeweler and have it made into two necklaces that look identical to the original, using half of the diamonds in one necklace, half in the other.

Or simply have an exact duplicate made and don't tell your daughters which is which. Ever. Not even on your deathbed. Royal families that have passed down gems for hundreds of years usually aren't wearing the exact same pieces their ancestors did.

ADVERTISEMENT

Queen Elizabeth inherited her grandmother, Queen Mary's, but she never wore it. Instead, the gems have been re-set into modern pieces. Remember that Princess Diana wore to hundreds of formal events? It was gifted to her as a brooch and she had it made into a necklace.

These thoughtful opinions cut deep, but do they thread the needle of this family drama, or just knot up the tension?

This tale of a diamond necklace and a divided family is a sparkling reminder that traditions can clash with evolving identities. The mother’s attempt to uphold a promise while offering a compromise was reasonable, but the fallout—rudeness and transphobia—shows how fast things unravel. Was sticking to tradition the right call, or should Jessica’s identity have reshaped it? Share your thoughts—how do you handle family traditions when new realities emerge?

ADVERTISEMENT
Share this post
ADVERTISEMENT

Related Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *