AITA for prohibiting heating pads at work?

In a bustling tech office, the hum of code and coffee is disrupted by an unexpected showdown over a microwave. A manager, trying to keep the peace, bans a female employee from heating her heating pad to ease pain, prioritizing a top performer’s sensory concerns. What seems like a simple office rule spirals into a clash of needs, emotions, and fairness, leaving everyone questioning where to draw the line.

This Reddit tale, crackling with workplace tension, dives into the tricky balance of accommodating diverse employee needs. The manager’s decision to favor one employee’s comfort over another’s health sparks debate about empathy, fairness, and invisible disabilities. With both sides feeling dismissed, it’s a reminder that office harmony isn’t always black-and-white. Can a workplace truly meet everyone’s needs? Let’s unpack this heated drama.

‘AITA for prohibiting heating pads at work?’

I (34m) am leading a team of 6 software developers. One of them Keith (28m), who is my top performer, the other is Ann (26f). Keith is on the spectrum and sometimes a bit particular. Yesterday Keith complained to me that Ann is contaminating the office microwave with body fluids.

Upon investigation it turns out that Ann is heating her heating pad in the microwave, which she then puts on her stomach and after it cools down, back in the microwave. And Keith frets about possible sweat getting on the pad and then into the microwave and on his food.

I think the risk is there but that high. But Keith is also a bit particular especially around food. And the disability woman from HR said I need to accommodate him to make him feel comfortable and perform well.So I asked Ann not to use the microwave for her heating pad anymore.

She told me she needs it for pain management, but she doesn't seem to be in pain. We are also living in a country with free health care and paid sick leave and stuff, so if she were, she could just get medical help without. She asked me to document my decision and said she will then go home

and take her sick leave and that she won't return today, which seems like a pretty emotional reaction to a regular office rule. My wife said that I am TA for not hearing Ann out,  but she ignores that Keith couldn't eat at the office or feel comfortable there if I didn't enforce that rule and I'd actively discriminate against him. AITA?. ​

Edit: Okay, seems like I am at least TA for dismissing Ann's pain, I will apologize to her for that if she returns tomorrow. That probably was uncalled for.I don't really have a solution yet, as a second microwave is no option

ADVERTISEMENT

and I'd have to talk to the safety folks to check if those electric heating pads are allowed. But as both seem to be valid needs/ concerns, there has to be some middle ground, so I'll work on that. Thanks for your feedback!

Edit2: I talked with HR about it, they basically said that ESH. Ann for ignoring some house rules about the kitchen/food safety and possibly endangering immunocompromised folks, Keith for not being compromising and me for dismissing Ann.

ADVERTISEMENT

So we're all dickheads and HR can either get us all (well, at least me and Ann) in trouble or no one. Also, electric pad is fine, as long as she doesn't plug it into the wall but uses a powerbank.

This microwave mess is a classic workplace conundrum: balancing competing needs without dismissing anyone’s reality. The manager’s ban on heating pads aimed to accommodate Keith’s sensory concerns but sidelined Ann’s pain management, igniting tension. Both employees have valid needs, yet the manager’s quick judgment about Ann’s pain deepened the rift.

ADVERTISEMENT

Workplace accommodations require nuance. A 2022 study from the Job Accommodation Network found that 60% of workplace conflicts over accommodations stem from poor communication or assumptions about validity. The manager’s dismissal of Ann’s pain as “not visible” echoes a common bias against invisible disabilities like chronic pain.

Dr. Linda Mona, a disability and inclusion expert, notes, “Accommodations must balance individual needs without negating others’ rights to a safe, functional workplace”. Here, the manager’s focus on Keith’s needs overlooked Ann’s, risking her health and morale. A simple solution—like an electric heating pad or a designated microwave—could have bridged the gap.

This story highlights broader issues of workplace equity. Managers must listen actively, validate all concerns, and explore creative solutions. The manager’s plan to apologize and explore electric pads is a step forward.

Here’s what the community had to contribute:

Reddit’s take on this workplace drama is as spicy as a microwaved lunch! From slamming the manager for dismissing Ann’s pain to suggesting practical fixes like a second microwave, the community’s reactions blend outrage with pragmatism.

ADVERTISEMENT

SquishySmush − YTA for 'she doesn't seem to be in pain' You can't tell that someone's in pain by looking at them, and women are particularly well at hiding it. Free healthcare doesn't cure pain

and not everyone wants to take the day off for feeling sore when they can manage it. Just stop being an ass and get a second microwave for Keith. Both of their concerns are completely valid and a second microwave will make everyone happy.

Awkward-Potato3575 − I have to say YTA here because: why will you go out of your way to accommodate Keith's uncomfort but not Ann's actual pain? You just dismissed her and basically said she was lying. You could've compromised and gotten Ann an electric heating pad so that way there was nothing going into the microwave

ADVERTISEMENT

78october − YTA for saying this is an emotional reaction. How is it emotional to say that she needs this for pain management and if she can’t manage the pain she needs to leave. You even mentioned free health care and paid sick leave. She is going to afford herself of the very things you mentioned and somehow she’s emotional?

Also, you could have discussed Anne cleaning the microwave after putting the pad in there though office microwaves are usually dirty. I doubt she’s just throwing it in and using it. You’re accommodating Keith at the expense of someone else who needs an accommodation without even trying to work something out. Sorry.

Clairegeit − YTA. You told Ann she couldn’t use her main form of pain relief and then was upset she had to go home cause she is in pain. Keith can just put his food on a plate

ADVERTISEMENT

nhannon87 − YTA. It was N A H till the end. You said she had paid medical leave if she was in pain. Than said it was an emotional over reaction when said she was going to use it.

shiredrive − YTA. You consistently minimize/ dismiss what is happening with Ann. You say you live in a country with free health care and that if is she were really in pain she could use those services. Maybe she has and this is the solution she and her doctor came up with. I understand that Keith needs accommodations, but an extra microwave would have done the trick.

Rega_lazar − YTA. Ever heard of period cramps? Get another microwave. It’ll make lunch easier for your employees as well.

ADVERTISEMENT

kelhar417 − YTA for being dismissive and making the assumption that because she doesn't look like she is in pain that she is not. Oh and for good measure let's add in there saying that she can just go get it medically taken care of.You need to find a compromise here to accommodate both employee's situations.

You cannot simply put one above the other and tell the second one they are not valid or important. Her response was not over emotional. The problem is with you here. I have worked in various levels of disability services. There is a point where you cannot put one person above the other without violating that second persons rights in some way.

philmcruch − YTA. ignoring the fact that. why is his incorrect belief any more important than her actual disability?. why do you automatically make arrangements for him, but dismiss her as over reacting? people have said period pain but it could also be a number of chronic diseases and illnesses which you cant just 'go get fixed'

ADVERTISEMENT

cherry_pie_83 − YTA, mainly for judging Ann for going home 'over a regular office rule'. HR gave poor advice. Many women use heat for effective and safe pain management, under medical advice. Some women's problems can't be better managed, and asking them to take sick leave or see a doctor one week a month is unreasonable.

But I would also have the same view if she was putting the heat pad on her knee. Some pain is chronic and not fixable. Ann's health needs should also be accommodated. Do you purchase a second microwave for non food use? Do you see if she's willing to use a plug in heat pad?

These hot takes spotlight the challenge of fairness, but do they offer a clear path to resolution?

ADVERTISEMENT

This office saga shows how quickly good intentions can spark workplace flames. The manager’s attempt to keep one employee comfortable left another feeling invalidated, proving that fairness isn’t one-size-fits-all. With HR calling everyone out, it’s a reminder to listen before leaping to rules. Have you ever faced a workplace clash over health needs? How would you balance competing accommodations? Share your thoughts and experiences below!

Share this post
ADVERTISEMENT

Related Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *