AITA for only wanting my Niece at my Wedding and not my Nephews?

Wedding bells were ringing for a 25-year-old bride-to-be, but her dream of a serene, child-free ceremony hit a snag when her fiancé’s sister bowed out as flower girl. Scrambling to fill the role, she turned to her 10-year-old niece, hoping a fancy dress would seal the deal, but her plan stirred unexpected family tension.

Her brother, already distant due to their age gap, bristled at the idea of bringing only his daughter while leaving his sons behind. The bride’s vision of a perfect day clashed with his sense of fairness, turning a joyful occasion into a delicate family standoff.

‘AITA for only wanting my Niece at my Wedding and not my Nephews?’

In five months, my (25F) fiancé (26M) and I will be getting married. We are obviously ecstatic, but the planning has been chaotic. From the start, we agreed that we didn't want any children there except for my fiancé's little sister, who I thought was going to be my flower girl.

My brother (35M) and I have never been close because of our age gap, so it really wasn't a big deal when he decided to stay home with his kids (12M, 10F, 8M) instead of coming. Well, my fiancé's little sister decided she didn't want to be the Flower Girl, which has left me scrambling for another one.

All of my female relatives are either my age or older, and my fiancé doesn't have any other sisters and it would be awkward asking a cousin of his, so I decided to ask my brother if his daughter would like to do it.

We talked about it all over SKYPE, and my Niece doesn't like weddings but she does like wearing fancy dresses so she decided she wanted to think about it. Well, I didn't mention to my brother that I only wanted my Niece there and that he needed to find child case for my Nephews.

When the topic was brought up, he suddenly turned cold towards the idea and said that it would be cruel to bring his daughter and exclude his sons, because they'd been upset that they weren't allowed at the wedding.

I'm pretty sure he was lying because theres no way in my mind that those kids would be so upset about a wedding, but my brother told me that it was a jerk move for me to only want one child there and to exclude her brothers, and told me he'd think about it.

ADVERTISEMENT

Well, he hasn't messages me in several days. I don't think I really did anything wrong, it's my wedding and my brother can't dictate it, and I don't want a bunch of kids there being chaotic and making everything about them, but I don't want to ruin the wedding because of this. So, I am being an ass over this?

The bride’s desire for a child-free wedding with one exception—her niece as flower girl—ignited a family rift. Her brother’s frustration is understandable; excluding his sons while inviting his daughter feels uneven, especially since the choice seems driven by the role rather than a bond. The bride’s oversight in not clarifying her intentions upfront fueled the misunderstanding.

ADVERTISEMENT

This situation highlights broader issues in wedding etiquette. A 2023 survey by The Knot found 65% of couples opt for child-free weddings to maintain an adult-focused atmosphere. Yet, selective inclusion of children, as in this case, can alienate family members. The bride’s focus on aesthetics over relationships risks perceptions of treating her niece as a prop.

Etiquette expert Elaine Swann advises, “When including children in weddings, ensure decisions reflect fairness and genuine connection, not just tradition”. Here, the bride’s selective invite overlooked her nephews’ feelings, validating her brother’s pushback. Swann’s advice suggests prioritizing family harmony over rigid plans, especially for distant relatives.

To resolve this, the bride could skip the flower girl role or invite all siblings to avoid favoritism. Open dialogue with her brother, acknowledging his concerns, could mend ties. For readers, consider discussing child inclusion early with family to align expectations, ensuring your wedding day reflects both joy and respect for loved ones.

ADVERTISEMENT

Take a look at the comments from fellow users:

Reddit users largely viewed the bride’s decision as unfair, arguing that inviting only her niece while excluding her nephews was inconsiderate. They felt treating the niece as a wedding “prop” undermined family bonds and validated her brother’s stance.

The consensus was that child-free weddings should be consistent, and selective invitations risk hurt feelings. Commenters urged the bride to rethink her approach, suggesting she either forgo the flower girl or include all siblings to maintain fairness.

[Reddit User] − YTA flower girls are not a requirement at weddings and treating children like props is s**tty. You seem to just want a female child, rather than to honor a child who is important to you.

ADVERTISEMENT

So yes, you are an a**hole. It is rude to have her and still exclude her siblings, especially so when it’s clear you don’t actually want her, so much as little girl who will look cute in a dress. You don’t want kids at your wedding? Then forgo the flower girl at the ceremony.

[Reddit User] − YTA. If you want a childfree wedding then don’t have a flower girl

merganzer − Mmmmm...yeah, my thoughts are that it's weird you want the child there as purely an interchangeable accessory, not because of any affection or relationship. And yes

ADVERTISEMENT

it's awkward to ask your brother to bring his daughter and leave his sons with a babysitter. I think YTA if you push this and that you should probably just find a way to do without a flower girl if you want an otherwise childfree wedding.

tkdwarriorprincess − YTA. Nice way to build a relationship with your family. You didn't invite the kids originally and now are using your niece and ignoring your nephews. Your brother had the right idea from the beginning of staying home

0biterdicta − YTA. Just go without a flower girl, or do something like a 'Flower Grandma'. It's rude to the nephews and niece to just invite the niece because you need a prop for your wedding.

ADVERTISEMENT

march-hare- − YTA you’re treating the child like a prop for your perfect wedding. Your brother is right to be frustrated at you and your plans.

DrFishTaco − YTA - it should’ve been obvious that he would assume that you were inviting all of them so you should’ve said something upfront.. And yes children get really upset when one child gets something and they don’t..

You also toss around child care a little flippantly without regard for finding adequate care and the expense involved. You’re entitled to having your wedding the way you want it but not entitled to treat your brother rudely

ADVERTISEMENT

ozziejean − YTA I have never heard of a child free wedding that included a flower girl. How boring for that girl and how insulting to everyone else and their kids.

[Reddit User] − YTA. You know you don't HAVE to have a flower girl, right?

scr33nplaythrowaway − YTA. It is your wedding but still his kids. So he can still reject your request based on you not allowing your nephews there.. You said no nephews, he can say no too.

ADVERTISEMENT

This wedding tale reveals how even well-intentioned plans can stir family discord. The bride’s selective invite sparked a fair debate about inclusivity and wedding priorities. How would you balance your dream wedding with family expectations? Share your thoughts below!

Share this post
ADVERTISEMENT

Related Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *