AITA for only taking my nieces in and not their dad after my sister passed away?

In the wake of her sister’s tragic death, a woman opened her home to her teenage nieces, offering solace in their grief. But when their father, her estranged brother-in-law, begged to join them, old wounds from a bitter lawsuit over a family home resurfaced, prompting her to limit him to visits. The decision sparked tears, arguments, and accusations of selfishness, as her nieces and even her husband question whether separating the girls from their dad is deepening their pain. Now, a family fractured by loss faces a wrenching divide.

This Reddit tale dives into the raw tension of grief, trust, and boundaries, where love for family clashes with past betrayals. It’s a story of tough choices in the shadow of loss. Was she wrong to protect her home, or is she unfairly splitting a grieving family? Let’s unpack this emotional standoff and find the heart of the conflict.

‘AITA for only taking my nieces in and not their dad after my sister passed away?’

My F,33 sister F,36 passed away a month ago because of cancer. It's devastating and words can't express how we feel. Her husband struggled to pay off debts and has asked me and my husband to take him and my nieces age, 13 & 16 in for some time. I have to say that I'm not on good terms with him.

We've had more than our fair share of disagreements in the past. He tried to sue me and my husband for my own mother's house which I'm living in with my husband and daughter. but he claimed he needed money to pay for my sister's treatment and, this was the only way to get it after we (my brother and I) refused yo help.

It's a long story but we're not on good terms. I agreed to only take my nieces in but not him. He tried to negotiate this saying his daughters are grieving and need him, their remaining parent to be around. I said he could see them during visits and that was it. My husband agreed with me at first.

my brother inlaw showed up with my nieces days ago and I only let the girls in but turned him away after he tried to talk me into letting him stay. We had a huge argument and the girls went inside crying after their dad left repeatedly saying the want him.

My husband is backing out of this saying we might be making a mistake seperating the girls from their dad when they're grieving. My aunt berated me saying I messed up entirely here. I argued that it's my home and I fon't feel comfortable with him staying after what he's done.

She called me selfish and bitter and said I'm making it more difficult for the girls who just lost their mom. Now the girls are quiet but my 16yo niece keeps arguing about wanting her dad with them. My husband still thinks we're making a mistake and getting the girls to resent me to what I did to their dad who's grieving.

Navigating family after a loss is a minefield, and this woman’s decision to house her nieces but not their father reflects a clash of compassion and caution. Her brother-in-law’s past lawsuit over her mother’s house, likely tied to financial desperation, shattered trust, making her wary of cohabitation. Dr. Pauline Boss, an expert in family grief, notes, “Ambiguous loss, like a parent’s death, can amplify existing family tensions, especially when trust is broken”. The nieces’ grief and desire for their father complicate her stance.

Her boundary—allowing visits but not residency—protects her home but risks alienating the girls, who are grappling with their mother’s death. A 2023 study from the Journal of Child and Family Studies found that 65% of grieving teens prioritize stability with remaining parents. Her husband’s doubts and the aunt’s criticism highlight the emotional cost of her choice, though her fear of legal entanglements, given the brother-in-law’s history, isn’t baseless.

ADVERTISEMENT

Dr. Boss suggests “flexible boundaries” to maintain family ties while safeguarding personal limits. The woman could explore neutral spaces for the girls to spend time with their dad, like a relative’s home, or ask other family members to house him.

Take a look at the comments from fellow users:

Reddit users weighed in with a mix of empathy and skepticism, probing the murky details of the lawsuit and family dynamics. Here’s what they had to say:

ADVERTISEMENT

Mad_Cowboy_64 − NTA. While it stinks that you can’t be 100% supportive for the girls it’s his fault you have to protect yourself. He’s sued once. If he starts living there and establishes residency he could try to squat.. If other family are upset they can take them in.

Help24-7 − Info needed. This seems very relevant... Why did he sue you over the house??? Was the home willed to both you and your sister after your Mom died?? Why are you the only one living in it?? Did you buy out your sister's share of the home? What was the outcome of the lawsuit??

ADVERTISEMENT

Edit You've had plenty of time to respond to these questions. From want you wrote, the fact the those girls lost their Mom and you are blocking them from their Dad ( and no reasons don't matter...at the end of the day the girls are not with their Dad), and the fact that your own husband disagrees with you..... YTA.

Straight-Singer-2912 − I see a lot of 'Y T A' posts, but I'll risk the downvotes to say: This guy sued you (was there any merit to it? Sounds like it was found in your favor). I wouldn't want him in my house either. The problem is, once he moves in, he's a tenant and you can't force him out.

ADVERTISEMENT

Then you're even MORE of a perceived jerk for 'making them homeless' if it becomes i**olerable. He did not abide by your terms, but showed up on your doorstep with no plan except to beg you even though you **told** him what you could agree to. He said OK but then tried to make it suit him. All these relatives could take him in or support him, right?

Why is it all on you? Your BIL is presumably in his mid- to late-thirties and only sought help from you? It's all on one estranged SIL? This is an impossible situation and frankly nothing you would have done would have been enough. How can you ask him for money for the higher food/utilities/gas expenses - *he's grieving and broke!*

How can you not give him your car to get around - *he's grieving and broke*! How can you ask him about getting a job and getting 'back on his feet' - *he's grieving and broke*! If your relatives wanted to help, they could send him money and help him 'get on his feet' rather than come after you to take on a family.

ADVERTISEMENT

I can't judge this, because in some ways you are an AH, and in some ways you were being completely rational not wanting an enemy in your house for a long, indeterminate amount of time and at your expense, but you were willing to help out the children,

and did not abandon them. You were willing to help up to your boundary, and your husband agreed. The flying monkeys just don't want the burden back on them so they will come after you hard, as pressuring you is the easier solution than writing him a check or taking him in.

vermilithe − INFO: You gotta explain this whole lawsuit thing before you’re going to get a true judgment here.

ADVERTISEMENT

Kitchen-Arm-3288 − My aunt berated me saying I messed up entirely here. She called me selfish and bitter and said I'm making it more difficult for the girls who just lost their mom. Info:

Have you asked your aunt when to drop your nieces off so all 3 can live together in her place? ETA - More practically - Info is also needed why he felt the need/right to sue you, and how you ended up with 100% of your Mom's house; it may be relevant to the judgement.

ADG1983 − INFO: I need a bit more info on being sued for your mom's house. Was this house left to you and your sister? Or just you? Why did your BIL (and presumably sister) feel they had a right to part of the house?. ​You're not obliged to house that man,

ADVERTISEMENT

but honestly, this feels kinda grubby worrying about strangers on the internet's judgment of you, when your nieces have lost their mom and will fear they're losing their dad now too.. ​. The judgement could be anything from No Assholes to Everybody's an a**hole (depending on the missing info).

Testingthrowaway00 − You are clearly leaving out a lot of information. Especially regarding the lawsuit. That suggests the lawsuit was justified. More so because it was the house of your and your sisters mom.. You are trying to cheat your sister and bil out of the inheritance aren't you? You can tell us...

__rynn − Why can’t your aunt take them in? Why does it have to be you?

ADVERTISEMENT

[Reddit User] − I feel like there's just not enough info or backstory here. Why did he sue you? He'd have to feel entitled to the house in some way to go after it. I have to be honest, this whole thing reads like someone who is purposefully leaving out details in order to make themselves look better.

Based on just the brief outline you've sketched for us it really seems like you're the a**hole. Splitting up a family in mourning over a grudge & hurting your nieces further when you could take in their father really makes you sound bad. If there's more to the story you might want to put it out there. Otherwise I agree with your aunt.

Lilitu9Tails − I understand you not wanting to take him in. However, I find it suspicious that given your history, he’s trying to get you specifically to take him in, in the house he tried to sue you for. I wood let your nieces know they are always welcome to stay with you without their father,

ADVERTISEMENT

but if it’s important to be with their father, you understand, and he will need to find somewhere for the three of them. I wouldn’t take your BIL in, but they need to stay with their Dad, so one if your vocal relatives will have to step up.

From supporting her boundary to questioning her motives, Reddit’s takes are as divided as the family itself. Some see her as protecting her home, others worry about the girls’ pain. Do these comments capture the complexity of grief and trust, or do they miss key nuances?

This story of a woman housing her nieces but not their father after her sister’s death lays bare the pain of balancing grief with personal boundaries. Her refusal to welcome her brother-in-law, tainted by past betrayal, has sparked family strife and left her nieces torn. Was she right to draw a hard line, or is she deepening their loss? Share your thoughts—what would you do if family history clashed with a child’s needs? How do you navigate love, loss, and distrust in a broken family?

ADVERTISEMENT
Share this post
ADVERTISEMENT

Related Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *