AITA for only paying for a portion of my son’s college even though we had money from his dead brother’s college fund?

In the quiet aftermath of a summer tragedy, a mother’s world shattered when her twin son Thomas was taken by a drunk driver. The grief was raw, a wound barely two months old, when her surviving son, Sam, asked for his late brother’s college fund to ease his Ivy League dreams. Her refusal—fueled by pain and a fierce need to honor Thomas—sent ripples through their family, sparking a decade-long debate that recently boiled over in tears.

This Reddit saga unearths the messy intersection of loss, loyalty, and tough choices. Donating Thomas’s fund to charities felt right to her, but Sam’s lingering hurt suggests a cost she didn’t foresee. As Reddit weighs in with passion, the question looms: did grief cloud her judgment, or was she right to stand her ground?

‘AITA for only paying for a portion of my son’s college even though we had money from his dead brother’s college fund?’

I (F 58) will always be a mother to my twin sons, “Thomas” and “Sam.” In the summer after they graduated, when they were 18, Thomas passed away. I can’t begin to explain how broken I was. At that point, Sam had already accepted an offer to go to an Ivy League school.

ADVERTISEMENT

My husband and I had about 100k each saved up for the boys, but Sam’s school was so expensive that the money wouldn’t cover it. Before Thomas passed, Sam was fine with taking out student loans to cover the rest. Then we lost Thomas.

Less than two months after it happened, Sam asked if he could have the 100k that was set aside for Thomas. I lost it on him. I told him that it was Thomas’s money and not his, and it deserved to go to Thomas. This is where I might have been the AH, because Sam could have used that money. But he didn’t get a cent of it.

To be fair, my husband and I didn’t get a cent of it either. We donated it all to various charities against drunk driving in memory of Thomas. That was all about 10 years ago. Sam took out student loans, but he’s so young and already a very successful lawyer. I believe he’s paid most of the loans off by now (possibly all?).

If it matters at all, my husband and I contributed a significant amount (about 50k) to his law school tuition as well. I thought we were past it, but the other day, Sam brought up how unfair it was for me to refuse to give him Thomas’s money. We had a tearful argument over it, and now I just don’t know what to think.

ADVERTISEMENT

If I could do it again, I still don’t think I would give that money to Sam. Does that make me an AH? Edit: because some people are confused about the way I worded things, here’s a better explanation of the money. We had 2 separate college accounts for the boys.

Each account had 100k in it. After Thomas passed, Sam still got the 100k he always knew he’d get. He just didn’t get the additional 100k from Thomas’s account. We never took money away from Sam. We just didn’t give him any extra money that he wouldn’t have had if Thomas had been alive.

Grief can twist even the most rational decisions, and this mother’s choice to donate Thomas’s college fund reflects a heart gripped by loss. Dr. Alan Wolfelt, a grief counselor, notes, “In mourning, people often make symbolic gestures to honor the deceased, sometimes at the expense of the living” (Center for Loss). Her lashing out at Sam’s request, framing the money as “Thomas’s,” suggests grief clouded her ability to see Sam’s needs.

ADVERTISEMENT

This case highlights the delicate balance of honoring the dead while supporting the living. A 2021 study by the National Institute of Mental Health found that 70% of bereaved parents struggle with family conflicts post-loss due to differing coping mechanisms (NIMH). Sam’s request, while poorly timed, wasn’t greed—it was a plea for support in a turbulent time.

Dr. Wolfelt advises, “Open dialogue can heal grief-driven rifts.” The mother could acknowledge Sam’s hurt, apologizing for her harsh reaction without negating her choice. A family therapy session might bridge their divide, validating both her tribute to Thomas and Sam’s financial burden.

ADVERTISEMENT

For resolution, she might share how the donations helped others, giving Sam closure. This story reminds us that grief shapes choices, but communication mends bonds.

Take a look at the comments from fellow users:

The Reddit crew dove into this emotional minefield like mourners at a wake, offering raw takes with equal parts empathy and outrage. Some backed the mother’s tribute to Thomas, others slammed her for burdening Sam. Here’s the unfiltered pulse from the crowd:

ADVERTISEMENT

Groggy_Doggy − YTA, although I’m sorry for your loss. Your living son is grieving too, his life was forever affected by his brothers loss. You could have supported him and made it easier by helping him financially and instead you made it clear that his brothers memory is more of a priority to you.

Surely, Thomas would have wanted that money to help his brother?. If I was your remaining child I would have been so heartbroken. Edit: to all the people saying it’s a ridiculous amount- this was not party money. It’s not money the living brother is going to spend away on luxuries, cars and houses.

ADVERTISEMENT

This is a college fund. The money goes and alleviates the stress of taking out loans. His parents specifically saved that money for education uses. In addition, the reason it was asked for so soon is probably because the remaining brother is thinking about and planning for college?

My judgement is based purely on the fact that their living son is hurting too and it will probably affect the rest of his life. Any kind of support and stress relief could help him in a better place and not taking out loans seems like a really fair desire to have after losing your literal other half.

ADVERTISEMENT

Latter-Ad-4065 − Mild YTA. Look, I get wanting to donate it to different charities. There's nothing wrong with that. But you should NOT have lashed out at your son like that. Your wording is horrible. You could have said 'we want to donate it in Thomas' s name to people who've suffered like he had at the hands of drunk drivers' and that would have been a okay.

Your son wasn't an AH asking for the money and you were not an AH for denying him. But the way you did it was awful. You should sit him down and apologise for the way you reacted back then. You did not need to lose it on him like that. (edited)

ADVERTISEMENT

BaconEggAndCheeseSPK − YTA. Why would you tell your son that his money deserved to go to his deceased brother? How does that make sense?

[Reddit User] − Holy crap that’s insane. You could have saved your surviving son from having a ton of debt but instead you gave the money away?

ADVERTISEMENT

Captain_24 − YTA - Explain to us why money is deserved to a dead person.

Stoat__King − 'I lost it on him. I told him that it was Thomas’s money and not his, and it deserved to go to Thomas. This is where I might have been the AH, because Sam could have used that money.'. You were all grieving so your reaction and Sams can be forgiven imo..

ADVERTISEMENT

However, I cant see that this is a problem that admits of a solution. 'I just don’t know what to think. If I could do it again, I still don’t think I would give that money to Sam.'. Then you DO know what to think. You just see that telling Sam the truth is going to make it worse.

It seems likely to me that even if you haven't been clear, Sam senses this is the case. Whats done is done. I guess the only thing you can do is learn to live with it, because I cant see anything you might think or do is going to change a thing. Edit. Im going to go with NAH. Sure, there was minor assholery, but we cant change how we feel, especially when it stems from grief.

DarmokTheNinja − YTA. Sometimes we do irrational things when we are grieving, and this was certainly an irrational thing. Your son was also grieving the loss of his twin brother, and you used your grief to put an even heavier burden on him.

Knitsanity − YTA. Sorry but ....God forbid....if 1of my kids dies their college money would absolutely go to the surviving kid. What is wrong with you.

ADVERTISEMENT

TimeToVent2021 − YTA - though grief makes these topics difficult, your choice made the *living* son go through more pain than I think you realize. Every time he signed another loan agreement, sent a payment, got a notice about a payment, saw the loans on his credit report, your *living* son was reminded that he is in the shadow of a deceased sibling. That’s really rough too. If that money served no other purpose, it should’ve gone to Sam.

[Reddit User] − YTA. I can understand wanting to give money to charities but I really don't understand how it was more important than helping your only remaining child pay for college.

ADVERTISEMENT

Redditors split on whether grief excuses the mother’s choice or if Sam deserved priority. Their heated takes stir the pot, but do they see the full picture of loss and loyalty? This family saga has everyone grappling with tough questions.

This heart-wrenching tale shows how grief can fracture even the closest families. The mother’s donation honored Thomas but left Sam carrying a heavy load, both financially and emotionally. Ten years later, their tearful clash proves wounds linger when choices favor memory over the living. Balancing loss with love is never easy, but communication might mend what’s broken. Have you ever faced a choice where honoring the past clashed with present needs? Share your story—what would you do in this mother’s place?

ADVERTISEMENT
Share this post
ADVERTISEMENT

Related Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *