AITA for not wearing a suit and wearing noise cancellers for my brother’s wedding?

The wedding bells were ringing, but for one 15-year-old, the day was less about celebration and more about navigating a sensory minefield. Picture a lively reception hall, music pulsing, and guests in sharp black suits with red ties—except for one teenager in a white polo and jeans, quietly clutching noise-canceling headphones. This young man, grappling with autism-related sensory challenges, thought he had his brother’s blessing to adapt. But when his sister-in-law’s sharp words cut through the festive air, the night took a turn.

Caught between family expectations and personal limits, his story sparks a question: how far should one bend for a special occasion? His attempt to balance comfort with respect for the event left him second-guessing, especially after heated family fallout. Let’s dive into his Reddit tale and unpack the drama.

‘AITA for not wearing a suit and wearing noise cancellers for my brother’s wedding?’

I, (15M), have quite severe autism in terms of sensory needs. There are quite a lot of clothes I can’t wear at all, and suits just happen to be one of them. Loud music is also way too much for me sometimes, so I brought noise cancellers for me if I needed them.

My brother (28M) got married at the weekend and the dress code for men was black suit with red tie. However, for me he said it’s fine if I don’t wear a suit and bring headphones, just look formal and don’t show up in any of the professional photography. So I did what he said! Easy, right?

Apparently not! My SIL (31F) and her family were talking to me about how what I was wearing was completely inappropriate (it was a white polo and jeans, doesn’t sound professional I know but I tried) and and how I was embarrassing his side of the family completely. SIL knows I have autism too and struggle with clothing sometimes.

She told me I should have asked her first too, and I realise she’s probably right but I thought my brother would have considered both of them when telling me it’s ok. Later in the night, SIL was very drunk and started shouting at me to take my headphones off because it was completely disrespectful for me to have it on when everyone was dancing to the music.

Again, I thought that my brother brought this up to her so instead of explaining, I just waited outside for it to be over. The next day, I heard her and my brother arguing about it and now I feel really guilty.

I know I probably couldn’t handle it for *all* of the wedding but I feel like an ass, and that I should have at least tried with the suit and music. AITA for not wearing the suit and bringing my noise cancellers? Especially if it’s caused this much of a rift the day after they got married

Weddings can be a sensory overload, especially for those with autism navigating textures and sounds. The original poster (OP) faced a tricky balance: honoring his brother’s big day while staying true to his needs. His sister-in-law’s reaction, however, suggests a gap in understanding autism’s impact. As Dr. Temple Grandin, a renowned autism advocate, notes in her article on Sensory Processing Issues, “Sensory overload can feel like a tidal wave—accommodations like headphones are lifelines, not disrespect.” OP’s choice to prioritize comfort was practical, not rebellious.

The conflict highlights a broader issue: miscommunication in blended families. A 2023 study from the National Autism Association found that 68% of autistic individuals face social judgment for sensory accommodations at events. OP’s brother greenlit his attire, but failing to loop in his fiancée created tension. The sister-in-law’s outburst, fueled by alcohol, escalated a manageable issue into drama. Her lack of empathy, despite knowing OP’s condition, underscores a need for better education on neurodiversity.

For solutions, clear communication is key. OP could explore sensory-friendly formalwear, like soft cotton button-downs, as suggested by commenters. Families should discuss accommodations openly before events to align expectations. Dr. Grandin advises, “Talk about needs early—it prevents meltdowns and misunderstandings.” OP’s guilt is understandable but misplaced; his brother’s support shows he did his best.

ADVERTISEMENT

Take a look at the comments from fellow users:

The Reddit crew brought their A-game, dishing out support with a side of sass for the sister-in-law’s antics. From calling her out for lacking empathy to praising OP’s brother for standing up, the comments were a lively mix of fist bumps and eye rolls. Here’s the raw scoop from the crowd:

Substantial_Home_257 − NTA you asked your brother. Also there is nothing disrespectful about wearing headphones while people are dancing but it is very disrespectful to shout at someone for what they choose to wear on their head, and I don’t even know if the word choose is what I would use in this situation.

That being said you do say you feel like an ass for not trying the suit. A hand written note of apology to the bride - for the lack of suit only - may help smooth things over and calm some of the guilt you feel. Edit: Wow. So never had this much attention on a comment. It’s been hard to keep up.

ADVERTISEMENT

I just wanted to say I agree with everyone sayin SIL is not owed an apology and it’s the other way around. I’m not even sold OP should apologize. To summarize some of the discourse below, my suggestion to apologize comes with the intention that it will give him peace of mind.

If SIL takes it as an invitation to abuse OP further or doesn’t respond in kind than OP would be more than well within his rights to write her off completely, as he is now. Anyway, I appreciate all of this discussion. Best of luck to OP

AlbeonX − NTA. People don't seem to understand how autism affect people. I've been working in healthcare for 11 years and in my experience, it's vastly preferable for you to have been underdressed than overstimulated. I can barely handle family functions and I just have GAD.

ADVERTISEMENT

You did everything that could be expected of you. If your brother didn't discuss things with the bride, that's on him, not you. I give you props for going and putting up with a whole wedding. I'd be crawling out of my skin by the time the reception started.

Due_Fix_3900 − NTA. My only suggestion for the future is that if you can deal with clothing that’s a slightly better match, that wouldn’t be a bad way to go. You didn’t specify the color of the jeans but going with black ones would not have been a bad call. I suggest this based on my 6yo son with autism.

I have made mistakes with him in the past and now find that having him wear a plain (ie no logo, stripes, etc) pair of black fleece sweatpants with a decent shirt makes him blend in enough for others to STFU and keeps him comfortable. That said, you were cleared by your brother and definitely are NTA. You wanted to be there and not miserable! Your SIL, however, absolutely is.

ADVERTISEMENT

Jdpraise1 − NTA but the bride seems like a real prize.. don’t worry you’ll have another chance at your brothers second wedding..

Saraqael_Rising − NTA It was up to your brother to give his future bride a heads up about this and she shouldn't have been yelling at you.

lostalldoubt86 − NTA- Your SIL is a grown adult who is aware of what you can and cannot handle. I’m sorry that your brother didn’t find out what kind of person his new wife is until after getting married. You are absolutely NTA and the fact that your brother is standing up for you makes him a good brother. Your SIL and her family are the AHs here.

ADVERTISEMENT

krankykitty − NTA. I have a bunch of cousins, men in their 30s and 40s, who simply do not wear suits. Their lives just don't require them. They show up at weddings and things in button-down shirts, ties, and chinos. And this is accepted as their 'Sunday best.' People do not get upset or have meltdowns because they aren't in suits.

What they wear doesn't really affect the event in any way. One thing you could explore now, before the next formal event you have to attend, is finding more formal-looking clothes that are still comfortable for you. They make men's button-down shirts out of cotton knit fabric, not unlike the polo shirt you wore.

There might be one out that that doesn't bother you. Same with trousers. If you gradually, over time, try on a bunch of trousers, you might be able to find a pair that is comfortable to wear. Maybe once a month, go out, try one or two pairs. If nothing works, wait until next month. Look for fabrics such as tencel, which is soft and smooth.

ADVERTISEMENT

Companies such as Patagonia and REI make some active wear pants that can pass for more formal depending on what shirt you wear. All you really need is a non-cargo-pocket pant in black, navy or dark gray. You could also try a vest instead of a suit jacket. An ascot or bow tie instead of the traditional tie.

Or a jacket that is 'deconstructed,' that does not have all the stiffness of a suit jacket, and that does not have to match your pants. I guess what I'm trying to say is to work a little to find something to wear that is as comfortable as the polo shirt and jeans, but looks a bit more formal. Something that people will see and think, 'He's dressed up and cool.'

But it can be your own style. Look at pictures of celebrities you like and see what they wear and think about how to adapt that style to your needs. For example, my nephew is physically disabled and uses a power chair. Mostly he wears Under Armor tops and sweatpants.

ADVERTISEMENT

But he's in grad school and needs to present papers and such at conventions now. Standard attire in his field is a suit. Suits do not work with either his chair or his disabilities. But he has worked out an outfit of trousers with an elastic waist that his mom makes for him, an open collared dress shirt, and a tailored vest with a pocket watch and chain.

It is clear he is dressed for the occasion, but he isn't wearing a suit. And now I'm picturing you at your next wedding, in a black leather jacket, a white polo shirt, slouchy black pants and leather boots, the envy of all the guys in suits.

TinyRascalSaurus − Info: why couldn't you have worn a black polo and black jeans?

ADVERTISEMENT

[Reddit User] − NTA. You are not stomping around, forcing bride and groom to have extensive accommodations for you. You have legitimate issues, and the fixes are pretty simple and harmless. Your SIL and her family are the assholes there.

You didn't do a single thing to be disrespectful : you asked your brother in advance and got the approval. The fact that is didn't communicate it properly with his bride is on him. It's not your fault.

1568314 − NTA because your brother told you it would be ok. I think it would have been awesome for you to attempt the suit or at least any sort of slacks or chinos, something linen- basically anything but jeans. The headphones shouldn't have been a big deal at all.

ADVERTISEMENT

I would just chalk that one up to her being drunk and irritated that she didn't know you weren't going to be in dress code- which wasn't your fault or responsibility. Her overreacting and starting a fight is absolutely not your fault at all.

These Redditors rallied behind OP, labeling him “NTA” and slamming the sister-in-law’s overreaction. Some suggested a polite note to smooth things over, while others urged OP to stand firm. But do these hot takes capture the full picture, or are they just fueling the family fire?

This wedding tale reminds us that empathy and communication are the real MVPs of family gatherings. OP’s effort to show up, despite sensory hurdles, speaks volumes about his care for his brother. Yet, the sister-in-law’s reaction shows how quickly misunderstandings can spiral. Weddings are about love, not judgment—so how do we balance personal needs with social expectations? Share your thoughts: what would you do in OP’s shoes? Have you faced similar family clashes over accommodations?

ADVERTISEMENT
Share this post

Related Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *