AITA for not wanting the responsibility of 2 thieving teenagers?

A small antique shop, repeatedly hit by vandals, catches two 17-year-old teens stealing via security cameras, lured by a “haunted” adventure on the Randonautica app. After the teens confess and return the items, a police officer suggests they work at the shop to make amends, but the owner resists, wary of liability and supervising culprits.

This Reddit story captures the tension between community leniency and personal boundaries after a theft. It highlights the shop owner’s struggle to seek justice without taking on unwanted responsibilities, resonating with those navigating fairness after being wronged.

‘AITA for not wanting the responsibility of 2 thieving teenagers?’

The shop owner’s reluctance to supervise two teens who stole from their shop is justified, given liability risks and the burden of managing untrustworthy individuals. The teens’ confession shows remorse, but their “haunted” excuse doesn’t excuse breaking in.

Restorative justice requires mutual consent, and the officer’s suggestion unfairly burdens the victim. Legal expert Dr. Sarah Thompson notes, “Victims aren’t responsible for offender rehabilitation; that’s for the system.”

The owner’s leniency in avoiding charges is fair, but supervising teens isn’t their duty. They should seek restitution through mediation for losses and suggest community service elsewhere.

The officer should connect the teens to programs, while parents ensure accountability. This respects the owner’s boundaries and ensures justice without added responsibility.

See what others had to share with OP:

Reddit users support the shop owner, arguing they’re not obligated to oversee teens who stole from them. They view the officer’s suggestion as impractical, citing risks of having thieves near valuable antiques.

Commenters reject the teens’ “haunted” excuse, advocating for community service at shelters or charities. They endorse pursuing restitution or minor legal action to hold the teens accountable without personal involvement.

This intriguing story of a shop owner resisting responsibility for two thieving teens highlights the clash between justice and unwanted obligations. Their stance underscores the importance of boundaries after being wronged. Share your thoughts below and let’s unpack this shop theft drama.