AITA For refusing to remove all alcohol from our house so that my SIL can move in?
Household rules can become a battlefield when personal values and charitable intentions collide with family responsibilities. In this post, a husband recounts how his wife insists on making their home 100% alcohol‑free so that her younger sister, who is in recovery from alcoholism, can move in and receive support.
While he fully supports offering help to family members in need, he objects to completely removing alcohol from their house—especially when the alcohol is stored in a basement bar he has poured years of effort into. His proposed compromise was to simply lock the bar away so that Beth would have limited access. Yet, his wife finds this measure insufficient, sparking heated debates about personal space, resource investment, and how much compromise is required when supporting a loved one in recovery.
‘AITA For refusing to remove all alcohol from our house so that my SIL can move in?’
Nonprofit and family counseling experts emphasize the need for balanced compromise when addressing conflicting household priorities. According to family therapist Dr. Laura Benson, “Family environments need to respect both the support systems required by individuals in recovery and the personal spaces and investments of other household members.
It is essential to devise solutions that protect vulnerable members without imposing unreasonable sacrifices on others.” Dr. Benson explains that “locking away items that can potentially trigger relapse is one practical solution, especially if that storage can be secured and out of sight. This approach minimizes risk while respecting all parties’ needs.”
Furthermore, experts note that when dealing with issues of addiction recovery, it is critical to avoid “all or nothing” policies that might inadvertently alienate those who are also part of the family. As one counselor stated, “Recovery is personal and should be supported with flexible boundaries.
If removing all alcohol causes more family discord, then alternative measures such as secure storage can be equally effective.” This expert insight supports the husband’s compromise, reinforcing that maintaining a sense of normalcy—by locking the basement without dumping the alcohol—can serve both the practical and emotional needs of the household.
These are the responses from Reddit users:
The Reddit community largely supports the husband’s stance while offering various perspectives on practical compromises: Numerous users praised the idea of locking the basement door as a reasonable solution that safeguards Beth from temptation without forcing a dramatic lifestyle change. Overall, community voices echo that the husband’s decision is both practical and considerate, making him “NTA” in this situation.
In conclusion, the husband’s refusal to remove all alcohol from the house for his sister‑in‑law’s temporary stay is rooted in a desire to balance familial support with personal boundaries. His proposal to lock away his basement bar serves as a responsible compromise—protecting Beth while preserving a significant part of his own life and investments. Although his wife interprets his reluctance as unsupportive, the decision aligns with the ethical guidelines of resource allocation and personal well‑being in a shared household.
What do you think about balancing recovery needs with personal space in a family setting? Have you encountered situations where you had to negotiate tough household compromises? Share your thoughts and advice in the comments below, and let’s discuss how to find equitable solutions when family priorities clash.