AITA for not giving my daughter the child support money that her father sends me, “in cash” so she can save for a car?
The hum of a suburban kitchen was drowned out by a 16-year-old’s fiery plea for cash. After a bitter divorce marked by her ex-husband’s affairs, a 46-year-old mom—let’s call her Karen—rebuilt her life with full custody of their daughter, Emily. While Karen saves her hefty alimony for retirement and lives off her income, Emily’s $1,800 monthly child support sits in a college fund. But Emily, fresh with a driver’s license, demands the money in cash to save for a car, claiming Karen has “no right” to withhold it.
Karen’s refusal, backed by her ex, ignited a clash of priorities—teen dreams versus long-term security. Emily’s push for independence feels urgent, but Karen sees a car as a luxury, not a need. This isn’t just about money—it’s a raw tug-of-war over trust, responsibility, and a mom’s vision for her daughter’s future, stirring a debate that hits home.
‘AITA for not giving my daughter the child support money that her father sends me, “in cash” so she can save for a car?’
Navigating teen expectations after divorce is a tightrope, and Karen’s clash with Emily over child support reveals a core parenting dilemma. Saving $1,800 monthly for college shows foresight, especially since Karen covers Emily’s needs with her own income. Family finance expert Suze Orman notes, “Child support is for the custodial parent to ensure a child’s well-being, not an allowance.” Karen’s decision, supported by her ex, aligns with this, prioritizing education over a car—a luxury at 16.
The issue hinges on perception versus reality. Emily, at 16, sees the money as hers, fueled by a desire for independence. But Orman warns, “Handing teens large sums risks poor financial habits.” Karen’s alimony, saved for retirement, shouldn’t be tapped for Emily’s wants, as it secures Karen’s future, indirectly benefiting Emily. Emily’s claim that Karen “has no right” reflects teen entitlement, not legal truth—courts entrust parents with child support decisions.
This taps a broader trend: 60% of teens expect parental funding for big purchases, often clashing with long-term goals. Karen’s choice to save for college is sound, but Emily’s frustration suggests a need for transparency. Orman advises “teaching kids financial literacy early.” Karen could share the savings plan with Emily, offering a small allowance from her own funds—say, $50 monthly—if grades stay strong, to teach budgeting.
Karen’s stance is responsible, but open dialogue could ease tensions. A family meeting to discuss Emily’s goals and the fund’s purpose might bridge the gap.
Here’s how people reacted to the post:
Reddit weighed in on Karen’s financial standoff with a mix of support and practical tips, dishing out takes on teen entitlement and parenting smarts. Here’s a peek at the community’s lively reactions.
These Reddit quips spark thought, but do they solve the clash between mom and teen? Real progress needs talk, trust, and a shared vision.
Karen’s refusal to hand over child support cash for a car isn’t just about money—it’s a stand for her daughter’s future in a world of instant gratification. Emily’s push for a car reflects teen dreams, but Karen’s college fund offers lasting security. This saga shows how divorce and dollars can strain family ties. How would you handle a teen demanding money meant for their future? Share your thoughts or experiences below!