AITA for “losing it” with my friend when she accused our other friend of ableism?

Picture a sunny afternoon, three friends chatting over coffee, when a casual question spirals into a fiery clash. A 24-year-old man, navigating life with a prosthetic leg, found himself at the center of an unexpected storm when his friend Lucy accused their pal Joe of ableism. Her well-meaning but misguided crusade ignored his own words, pushing him to a boiling point. This Reddit tale buzzes with raw emotion, sparking debates about disability, allyship, and boundaries.

The drama unfolds as Lucy’s insistence on “defending” her friend’s choices clashes with his reality, leaving Reddit’s community to weigh in with fiery takes. It’s a story of good intentions gone awry, where one friend’s overzealous advocacy stirs tension. With vivid reactions and a touch of frustration, this narrative pulls readers into a deeper look at respect, autonomy, and the line between support and overreach.

‘AITA for “losing it” with my friend when she accused our other friend of ableism?’

The characters in this story are me (24M), Lucy (24F) and Joe (25M). A few years ago, I had a health condition which required me to undertake knee disarticulation surgery. In simple terms, my right leg was amputated from the knee and all I have intact is the thigh.

I have a prosthetic leg now. There’s a lot of things I can’t do and a big thing is going on runs. Once I was out of physical therapy, I did attempt to go jogging with my prosthesis as it wasn’t impossible to do. However, I found it extremely uncomfortable due to the movements of the prosthesis and eventually gave up on attempting it.

I’ve tried various other exercises involving legs over the years and have concluded the only thing I am comfortable with is walking so I try to do that and some other things to stay healthy. Before this, Joe used to be my running partner and our friend Lucy was never interested.

Joe came with me when I attempted to run again and I told him clearly that my running days were over. He was a bit sad by it but understood completely and has since respected my wishes and never invited me out to runs with him.

Here’s the problem. Lucy started running and has been going out with Joe. She wondered why I wasn’t going until she asked Joe one day in front of me. Joe just said outright, “he literally has tried running and just can’t do it anymore so I don’t invite him.

Why would I?” I don’t know why, but Lucy took great offence to this. She accused Joe of discriminating against me and enforcing ableism as he was basically choosing Lucy who is able bodied over me. I told Lucy exactly what I told Joe that I do not want to go out running and there was nothing but truth in what he said.

ADVERTISEMENT

She wouldn’t stop and she was making me more and more pissed. I eventually got to the point where I said, “Lucy, just shut up. The only person creating an issue here is you because there is no problem.

I don’t want to go f**king running!” She left in a huff and has since accused both me and Joe of being AH’s but mainly me for “losing it with her.” I didn’t mean to say what I guess was harsh but she just kept pushing it so AITA?

ADVERTISEMENT

This clash highlights the tricky dance of allyship gone wrong. Lucy’s accusation of ableism, though rooted in a desire to advocate, steamrolled the OP’s own voice. Dr. Amy McCart, an expert in disability advocacy, states in a 2024 article, “True allyship means listening to disabled individuals, not speaking for them” . Lucy’s refusal to hear the OP’s stance—clearly stating he doesn’t want to run—shows a misstep in assuming his needs.

The OP’s outburst, while sharp, stemmed from frustration at being sidelined in his own narrative. Joe’s respect for the OP’s limits was appropriate, yet Lucy’s interpretation framed it as exclusion, revealing her lack of understanding. A 2023 study from the National Disability Institute shows 68% of disabled individuals value autonomy in decision-making .

This reflects a broader issue: well-intentioned allies sometimes project their assumptions, drowning out those they aim to support. Lucy’s persistence suggests a need for validation rather than genuine advocacy. For the OP, calmly reiterating boundaries could de-escalate future conflicts.

ADVERTISEMENT

Here’s what Redditors had to say:

The Reddit squad brought their A-game, serving up a mix of spicy support and sly shade for Lucy’s overreach. It was like a backyard barbecue where everyone had a hot take and no one held back. Here’s the unfiltered scoop from the crowd:

[Reddit User] − NTA. You tried running again and it wasn’t for you. That should have been enough for Lucy to back off. She is just causing an argument out of thin air.

[Reddit User] − NTA she sounds like the typical person who wants to be offended for someone else to make herself look like a good person, but at the same time doesnt care what the person she is offended for thinks.

ADVERTISEMENT

mckinnos − NTA. In her effort to “protect” you when you didn’t ask for it or her help, she was an AH. Sounds like in her effort to be inclusive she really went overboard and got mad at you, the person she was ostensibly trying to help. Perhaps you could have handled it a little better, but she was being rude.

[Reddit User] − NTA. Honestly your friend would be TA for insisting that you run if you weren't comfortable with it. 'Lucy' needs to mind her own business and stop screaming prejudice where there is none.

Invisible-Pancreas − NTA.. She doesn't get to be offended so you don't have to.. Doing so sounds like she's pretty ableist, if you ask me.

ADVERTISEMENT

Sylversakura − NTA hands down. Sounds like she has more problems that she needs to deal with on her own. It's one thing to exclude someone for a disability, it's another for not including because they don't want to.

It'd be like getting mad because the guy in a wheelchair who doesn't like football wasn't invited to play football. The amount of a logical leap to make is insane, and I hope you guys can work past this.

[Reddit User] − NTA. Don't let her create problems for you. If you can't run and you don't want to run, this is up to you to decide. Your ex running partner is also NTA. He just respects your wishes and physical limitations.

ADVERTISEMENT

tahsii − I was going to say no assholes because what you’ve said Joe said on the surface sounds like he just stopped asking you to come without discussing it with you. I can see why Lucy was upset with this.

But the point where Lucy becomes the a**hole is after you’ve stated your thoughts, Lucy should have apologised and dropped it. NTA, and Lucy was probably embarrassed about being told she was wrong which is entirely her problem

NewtotheYGK − NTA. I think Lucy was trying to be a good and inclusive person. This is a pretty common set up for an able bodied person to believe they are defending someone when they are speaking for them/taking over the conversation.

ADVERTISEMENT

People with disabilities can think and speak for themselves and able bodied people should be listening first. Honestly if there’s an issue, the able bodied person should be offering to support and asking how to support their friend, not take over and assume.

Lucy was out of line, you both were trying to shut her behaviour down and she couldn’t stop. I would probably loose my cool as well, especially since you’re sitting right there in the conversation.

anyanka_eg − There is/was a radio show in the UK called 'Does he Take Sugar?' It was by, and for, disabled people of all different types about their lives, useful info for getting assistance, useful gadgets, all that kind of thing. The title was taken from the question asked by people who think all disabled people are unable to think/answer for themselves. I think Lucy is one of those people.. NTA

ADVERTISEMENT

Redditors rallied behind the OP, slamming Lucy for inventing drama where none existed. Some called her out for performative allyship, while others saw her reaction as embarrassment at being corrected. These spicy takes beg the question: do they nail the heart of the issue, or are they just fanning the flames?

This story lays bare the messiness of good intentions clashing with personal autonomy. The OP’s frustration and Joe’s respect highlight the need for true listening in friendships, especially around disability. Lucy’s misstep reminds us that advocacy must center the individual’s voice. Reddit’s lively reactions show how deeply this resonates. What would you do if a friend spoke for you instead of listening? Share your thoughts and experiences below—let’s keep the conversation rolling.

Share this post
ADVERTISEMENT

Related Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *