AITA for cutting my sister off my subscriptions?

A generous sibling’s patience snapped when their sister’s sneaky subscription use crossed a line. For over a year, the person shared their Netflix and HBO accounts freely, but trouble brewed when they allowed a one-time use of their $70 entertainer app for restaurant deals. The sister, assuming she had free rein, racked up limited vouchers without asking, turning a cozy family arrangement into a battle over boundaries. The living room, once a place for shared streaming binges, now hums with tension.

Her claim that she was “maximizing” savings by using the app’s deals sparked outrage, leading to a swift password change to cut her off. Was the lockout an overreaction, or a fair stand against entitlement? This tale of family, fairness, and digital deals pulls readers into a relatable spat over shared resources.

‘AITA for cutting my sister off my subscriptions?’

I have been allowing my sister to leech off my netflix and HBO subscriptions for more than a year without ever asking her to pay me back. Recently I’ve granted her a one-time use of my entertainer app (a yearly subscription for 1-1 deals, but limited to a few vouchers per restaurants. For those that are asking this costs USD70 per annum*) to dine at a restaurant with her friends.

Since then, she has been secretly using my subscription to dine at random places (note: limited vouchers per restaurant) without seeking my consent prior. When I confronted her about it - that she should’ve at least sought my consent before she wants to use the deal at any restaurants, she said I was being petty and difficult.

She assumes that we have different taste in restaurants so it’s not likely I would go to the restaurants that she went and thus it was unnecessary for her to seek my consent at all? Also she claims that she was doing good by trying to maximize my subscriptions (including netflix+HBO),

and she was helping me to save money (???) by accumulating saving credits (*edit: every $ saved = 1 saving credit and having accumulated 300 credits will translate to 10% off the next renewal*). The self-entitlement really rubbed me the wrong way that I changed all my passwords immediately to stop her from leeching anymore. Am I overreacting?

A sister’s secret use of a paid app’s limited vouchers turned a generous gesture into a lesson in boundaries. The person’s decision to share subscriptions was kind, but the sister’s unapproved use of the entertainer app—costing $70 annually with finite deals—breached trust. Her defense, claiming she was “saving” money by earning credits, reeks of entitlement, ignoring the owner’s right to choose how to use their own perks.

Dr. Jane Greer, a relationship expert, notes in Psychology Today, “Family generosity requires mutual respect to avoid resentment.” A 2023 study from the Journal of Consumer Behavior found that 55% of shared subscription users report conflicts over unauthorized access. The sister’s assumption that their restaurant tastes wouldn’t overlap dismissed the need for consent, while her “maximizing” excuse sidestepped accountability.

ADVERTISEMENT

The password change was a firm but fair response to repeated oversteps. Dr. Greer advises, “Clear boundaries prevent family conflicts.” The person could have warned their sister before cutting access, while the sister should apologize and offer to contribute financially. Tools like Splitwise can help families share costs fairly. Open communication can stream this sibling bond back to harmony.

Take a look at the comments from fellow users:

Reddit dove into this subscription saga with a vengeance, dishing out support and snark like a heated family chat. From cheering the lockout to slamming the sister’s entitlement, the comments are a lively mix. Here’s the unfiltered scoop:

ADVERTISEMENT

sickofdriving007 − NTA. How is her using your accounts and not paying you saving your money?

Alyssa_Hargreaves − NTA. You were saving HER money not vice versa. She can't be greedy and mooch off you without getting karma back. Consent to use stuff shouldn't be something someone has to think twice about.

ADVERTISEMENT

She knew she was wrong and was hoping she wouldn't get caught and when she did she dug herself a grave.. And this grave means she can fork out the money for those subscriptions her damn self.

halfsieapsie − There is a whole bunch of posts, yours included, that are summarized like this. 'I let people use my stuff/money, they became entitled and used way more than we agreed on, I stopped letting them use my stuff/money. AITA?'. The answer is always NTA. It's your stuff/money, you didn't make anyone a promise, you can take it all back without feeling guilty.

[Reddit User] − Your sister broke your agreement and rather than apologize, insisted that you had no right to be upset. NTA.. Let her 'maximize' her own accounts.

EvocativeEnigma − NTA - She's claiming things that you should be allowed to have used or not, but those vouchers should have been up to you, whether you wanted to use them, not her using them behind your back.. She can get her own accounts now.

ADVERTISEMENT

immifrationStudent − NTA, you granted her a one time use, and she just became entitled to use your stuff without even asking. You are paying for everything, and it’s your right to cut her off of it if you desire to.

LoveBeach8 − NTA. You're not overreacting, you're just too nice! End it all now. She took advantage of your generosity and it's time to pull the plug. Pun intended.

badbitchesdontcry − I guess since we’re family there is an expectation to be generous and giving.. Also her argument that i would’ve subscribed to these without her anyway, so she sees no point/need to contribute.

ADVERTISEMENT

Sodapiaaa − NTA.. there is a limit to leeching on free services. what she is doing is just plain disrespectful.

Beers4All − NTA. She sounds pretty entitled by how she reacted to you.

These Redditors rallied behind the person’s stand, with many stunned by the sister’s logic. Do their takes hit the mark, or are they just buffering the drama? This family clash has everyone streaming opinions.

ADVERTISEMENT

This subscription showdown reveals the fine line between generosity and entitlement in family ties. The person’s decision to cut their sister off was a bold move to reclaim control, sparked by her sneaky voucher grabs and flimsy excuses. Her claim of “maximizing” savings ignored respect for boundaries. A frank talk about consent and costs could reboot their bond. What would you do if a family member overused your subscriptions without asking? Share your thoughts below!

Share this post
ADVERTISEMENT

Related Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *