AITA for charging 1 daughter rent but not the other?
A disabled couple asks their high-income 22-year-old daughter for several hundred pounds a month in rent, while their 21-year-old daughter, who dropped out of university after an injury, gets rent-free in return for cooking, cleaning, shopping and pet care. The older daughter pays without complaint, but the wife now questions the arrangement.
Complicating matters is the parents’ ongoing grief after a car accident and their own jobs, which makes the younger daughter’s help more necessary than optional. Both girls enjoy expensive grocery and utility shopping, but only one pays. The family remains close, but fairness remains elusive.

‘AITA for charging 1 daughter rent but not the other?’
The family setup began after a life-changing accident left both parents disabled.


Daily life became easier with the younger daughter’s full-time help at home.

The rent decision sparked questions about fairness between the sisters.



Family dynamics are often based on equal contributions rather than identical treatment. Parents treat their daughters differently because each brings value in distinct ways—one through income, the other through labor that replaces paid services such as cleaning, cooking, and care. This reflects how much households cover costs without cash.
The opposing views highlight potential long-term risks for the daughter at home. Complicating matters is the fact that she has no plans to work or study outside the home, which could limit her future independence while her sister builds her career. Parents must balance immediate needs with encouraging personal growth to avoid unwanted dependency.
From a broader societal perspective, such arrangements reflect evolving parent-child relationships in high-cost areas such as London. “In multigenerational households, non-financial contributions can equal or exceed monetary contributions, especially when caring for disabled family members,” notes Dr. Elena Rodriguez, a family therapist at the British Association for Counselling and Psychotherapy (source: BACP Journal, 2023). Ultimately, fairness depends on mutual agreement and open communication, ensuring no one feels exploited over time.
See what others had to share with OP:
Many users support the poster, praising their steadfast decision to recognize different contributions.






Some users offer balanced counter arguments, acknowledging the logic while urging future planning.
![[Reddit User] − NTA but do encourage your 21 year old to start planning her life in some way. Either through work or education, she is letting precious years slip...](https://en.aubtu.biz/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/wp-editor-1761982358975-1.webp)


A couple of users add humorous or light-hearted comments to ease tension in the discussion.





The parents’ arrangement treats their daughters based on contributions—one pays rent from her job, the other earns her keep through extensive home support that aids their disabilities. Everyone involved seems content, with no conflicts reported among family members.
How do you handle fairness when adult children live at home in different roles? Would you charge rent differently, or encourage the helper toward outside goals sooner?
