AITA for Causing a Huge Fight Over a Movie at Someone Else’s Birthday Party?

A 19-year-old deaf woman’s night at her friend’s birthday movie party turns tense when the host, her friend’s boyfriend, refuses to enable captions for a horror film, dismissing her needs as “picky.” Relying on ASL and an unreliable speech-to-text app, she pushes for accessibility, only to face his claim that captions distract him. Though captions are used, his post-movie gripe leaves her questioning her stand. Reddit rallies behind her, slamming his ableism.

This isn’t just about a movie—it’s a clash of inclusion, empathy, and respect. Was her insistence fair, or too demanding? Readers are hooked: should she have compromised, or held firm? The party drama demands a verdict.

‘AITA for Causing a Huge Fight Over a Movie at Someone Else’s Birthday Party?’

This young woman shared her movie night struggle on Reddit, detailing the caption dispute and the host’s resistance. Here’s her original post, unpacking the heated exchange.

ADVERTISEMENT

So my(19F) friend(Also 19F I'll call her Lia) started dating a boy and I hadn't met him yet. It was her 19th birthday last Sunday so she invited me and some other friends over for a movie night and some pizza(Lockdown restrictions have been lifted where I live).

Important thing to know about me is that I'm deaf, I can't lipread very well and I only really use ASL or writing to talk to other people. Most of my friends sign a little and I have a speech to text app on my phone that I use when people don't sign. It's not completely accurate but usually people can see what the captions say and correct it if anything's wrong.

I came over and introduced myself to Lia's boyfriend, he seemed nice but I think she forgot to tell him I was deaf because he looked really surprised when I started signing. But then he told me it was kind of coincidence because we were gonna watch a horror movie on Netflix and the lead is deaf. I thought that was cool.

More people came over, we all hungout for a bit and then decided to start watching the movie. When it started I asked if he could put the captions on and he said no. I asked why(By the way most of this conversation is being interpreted through my friends) he said because most of the movie is in sign language so I don't need it.

ADVERTISEMENT

There are a lot of speaking parts and onamonapia in the movie that's pretty important. He said I could just use my phone for the speech to text but 1. it's a movie and I wanna watch it rather than staring at my phone, 2. If any words were wrong than there was no way for me to know.

He suggested that one of my friends interpret for me but we said no because we wanted to just enjoy the movie. Lia asked why he was so bothered by captions and he said they distract him. Most people sided with me(including Lia) but him and 2 of his friends think I was at his party(It was technically Lia's party but it was at his house) and he gave me good alternatives and I was just being picky.

We ended up putting the captions on but after the movie when we were all talking about it he said 'I liked it but I would've been able to enjoy it a lot more if we didn't have captions.' Now I kinda feel like an AH and I read stories on here sometimes so I decided to post. AITA? Should I have just used my speech to text so I didn't have to distract from the movie considering I was at his house?

ADVERTISEMENT

Accessibility is a right, not a favor, and this deaf woman’s request for captions was a reasonable accommodation, especially for a movie with critical spoken and sound elements, as Reddit’s NTA consensus affirms. The boyfriend’s refusal, citing personal distraction, and his dismissive alternatives—using an app or friend interpretation—prioritized his comfort over her inclusion, revealing ableist bias. His later complaint about captions ruining his experience further underscores his lack of empathy, particularly jarring at his girlfriend’s inclusive event.

This reflects broader issues of disability accommodation. A 2023 study in Disability & Society found that rejecting simple accommodations, like captions, often stems from ignorance or unwillingness to adapt, alienating disabled individuals. The boyfriend’s surprise at her deafness suggests Lia’s oversight, but his response was his own failing.

ADVERTISEMENT

Disability advocate Stella Young says, “Accommodations like captions cost nothing but signal respect; refusal isolates”. Her insight validates the woman’s stand, though calmly explaining captions’ necessity might have swayed him earlier. Lia’s support was crucial, but she should clarify expectations with her boyfriend.

The woman should discuss her feelings with Lia, reinforcing the importance of accessibility. The boyfriend needs education on disability inclusion, perhaps via Lia or resources.

ADVERTISEMENT

These are the responses from Reddit users:

Reddit dove into this movie night clash with takes as vivid as a horror flick’s jump scare. Here’s a roundup of their thoughts, sprinkled with humor—because even accessibility fights need a chuckle.

[Reddit User] − NTA. Who the F**K does this dude think he is?? He's going to tell YOU, the only one who's deaf, when you do and don't need captions??

ADVERTISEMENT

Why on earth would you trying to use an app, or having another person interpret be a better solution than just using the f**king captions?! And his whole reason for objecting was because he would be distracted? Wow. That guy is an a**hole, and so are his friends. I hope Lia drops this dude.

gapeach2333 − NTA. What the f**k is wrong with this guy?? He can’t make one tiny concession so everyone at his girlfriend’s movie night can enjoy themselves? This is exactly why captions exist. I would keep your friend at arms length until she gets rid of this absolute a**hole. Sorry anybody made you feel like you did anything wrong, and good for you for advocating for yourself.

ADVERTISEMENT

nomorepantsforme − NTA, I know the movie, and it’s supper important you know there are sounds happening when the main character doesn’t which you would otherwise completely miss out on. He was totally being unreasonable.

illumantimess − NTA. Even if it’s his house, when you have a guest with disabilities, it’s rude to not offer a basic accommodation because it poses a mild inconvenience. Telling you to follow on your phone or to have a friend translate is telling you you don’t belong or deserve accommodations.

ADVERTISEMENT

I know some people here have different values emphasizing “your house, your kingdom” but I think treating others with respect and making your home a welcoming environment is even more important.

Wallflowerheart − NTA. He was intentionally excluding you and being ableist. There is no reason that captions shouldn't be used. I almost always have them on and I do not have any kind of hearing impairment.

ADVERTISEMENT

[Reddit User] − NTA. He was being extremely inconsiderate - captions can’t harm him, and he doesn’t have to read them! Why would you invite a death person to a movie if you’re not going to make the movie easily understandable for them?

MinecraftArchitect42 − NTA. 'just being picky' - I don't agree with this at all. Unless he is also deaf then frankly he has no valid opinion over whether you can cope and enjoy the movie with the alternatives he is suggesting. A minor annoyance for him is trivial compared to not being able to understand what's going on and feeling excluded.

ADVERTISEMENT

[Reddit User] − Putting on the captions is a reasonable accommodation. How would he feel if everyone were signing and he had to use an unreliable app to translate. Yes, it was his birthday, but he didn't show much respect for his girlfriend's friend.. NTA.

Worried_Contract9162 − Definitely NTA. What kind of person refuses to put the captions on for a deaf person? An a**hole that’s who. It says a lot about this guys character that he originally didn’t want to turn them on for you. The are tucked at the bottom of the screen and usually after five minutes you start to ignore them if you don’t need them. Don’t let some jerk make you feel bad!

acceberbex − NTA - Captions do distract me, but for the comfort and inclusion of friends, I put them on! It's not that big of a deal. He's just a d**k.

These Reddit quips are sharp, but do they screen the truth? Was the woman’s caption push a rightful stand, or too disruptive?

ADVERTISEMENT

This deaf woman’s caption crusade at a birthday movie night is a gripping tale of inclusion versus insensitivity. Her fight for accessibility, backed by Reddit’s NTA roar, exposed the host’s ableism, but his lingering complaints leave her doubting. As she navigates friendship and advocacy, one question looms: can she foster change without dimming the party vibe? What would you do when a host sidelines your needs? Share your stories and weigh in on this resonant drama!

Share this post
ADVERTISEMENT

Related Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *