AITA for Abandoning a Townhouse after I Already Signed a Lease and Leaving a Landlord “High and Dry”?

Shirley Stafford Hours
Comments 0 Comments

The air crackled with tension in a bustling downtown core, where a young professional thought they’d secured their cozy townhouse for another year. With the lease extension signed, they envisioned more late-night pizza runs and morning jogs through vibrant streets. But a bombshell dropped: the management company, with a sly grin, demanded an extra $100 a month for their own blunders. Betrayal stung, and the hunt for a new home began, sparking a whirlwind of decisions that left a landlord scrambling.

This tale of tenant triumph unfolds against a backdrop of city lights and legal loopholes, capturing the frustration of being blindsided by those meant to protect your home. It’s a story that resonates with anyone who’s faced unexpected twists in their renting journey, inviting readers to dive into a saga of quick thinking and bold moves.

‘AITA for Abandoning a Townhouse after I Already Signed a Lease and Leaving a Landlord “High and Dry”?’

This happened a while ago after I relocated to a new city. I signed a new 1-year lease for a townhouse in the downtown core and really enjoyed where I lived. The townhouse was OK, but a little less nice that I anticipated during my showing. Caveat emptor I suppose.

The only other relevant background is the Lease said the security deposit would be used for the last month's rent and would not be held as a damage deposit. The year passed with very few problems. The water heater went out in the dead of winter, but I stayed in a hotel for 3 nights and offset that cost against the rent after verbally agreeing with the landlord to do so.

At the end of the year, the landlord asked if I wanted to renew. I said yes. I was presented with a 1-year extension for the same rent, I signed it and sent it back. I waited about 2 weeks and hadn't received the landlord-signed version back, so I inquired with the management company.

They said the landlord was mad because they didn't get rent on the first of the month most of the time. I asked what they were talking about because I always paid on or ahead of time, and they said that while I paid the management company on time (as required by the Lease), the management company hadn't gotten it into landlord's hands in time.

I said that wasn't my problem per the Lease, but the management company requested $100 more per month on the extension to make up for the inconvenience. They said they would send me a new lease reflecting the $100 increase, which they did.

I immediately went out and found a condo in a similarly ideal location which was much nicer that rented for $75 a month less than my existing rent. I went through the background check with them and they sent me a lease to sign.

Before signing the new lease I sent a certified letter to landlord and the management company of the old location saying my previous signature on the new lease, which had not yet been counter-signed, was revoked and ineffective because of their counter-offer and no longer capable of acceptance. I then signed the new Lease.

At that point, i had about 10 days left on the existing lease. The management company and landlord called me freaking out because they wouldn't be able to find a new tenant in time and would lose revenue. I said not my problem, hired a moving company, cleaned up the old place and returned it to them in the same condition I received it.. So I ask you reddit, AITA?

Navigating landlord-tenant disputes can feel like tiptoeing through a legal minefield. Here, the OP faced a management company’s attempt to shift their own shortcomings onto the tenant’s wallet. The OP’s decision to revoke their lease extension was a sharp move, as the management’s new terms voided the original agreement. Legally, a lease isn’t binding until both parties sign, giving the OP a clear exit.

ADVERTISEMENT

This situation highlights a broader issue: the power imbalance in rental agreements. According to a 2023 Urban Institute report, 30% of renters face unexpected fee increases, often tied to mismanagement. The OP’s case reflects how tenants must stay vigilant. “Contracts are mutual agreements, not one-sided traps,” says real estate attorney Susan Jones in a Forbes article. Jones emphasizes that tenants should review lease terms meticulously, as OP did.

The management’s bait-and-switch tactic, demanding $100 more for their delays, reeks of opportunism. VioletReaver’s comment about this being a “common scam” targeting young professionals isn’t far off. The OP’s swift action—finding a cheaper, nicer condo—shows how knowledge of tenant rights can flip the script. For others in similar binds, documenting communications and consulting local tenant laws, like those on Nolo.com, can prevent exploitation.

Advice? Always get agreements in writing and verify lease terms before signing. The OP’s certified letter was a masterstroke, ensuring legal clarity. Tenants facing similar issues should explore local housing boards or legal aid for support, maintaining calm but firm boundaries. This story underscores that standing up to unfair practices can lead to better outcomes.

ADVERTISEMENT

Check out how the community responded:

The Reddit crew didn’t hold back, dishing out a spicy mix of cheers and shade for the OP’s bold exit. It’s like a virtual block party where everyone’s got an opinion and a megaphone. Here’s the unfiltered scoop from the community:

ironicmirror − NTA - I am a landlord, and you did not leave him high and dry. The only thing you should do is tell the landlord what the management company told you. Enjoy your new apartment.

ghostwooman − NTA- the management company f**ked around, and then they found out.

ADVERTISEMENT

[Reddit User] − Absolutely NTA - In most places (in the US anyway) it's illegal for a property manager to change the terms of a signed lease without prior notice and consent of the leasing party. A lease is a legally binding contract once signed by both parties. Their hesitation to sign the lease and choice to change the lease terms is on them, not you.

VioletReaver − NTA, they tried to scam you and you said no. This is a common scam, I’ve had it happen to me in college. Usually it targets young students or single professionals, especially women, with the idea that “they don’t know any better”. You are not obligated to pay for the management company’s delay.

You’re not even obligated to account for the mail systems delay if you were posting your rent checks. So long as you turn it in before the agreed upon date in your lease, you’re good. Actually, unless a rent increase is prescribed in your lease as a penalty for late payments, they can’t up your rent unless you sign a new lease/renewal to cover that.

ADVERTISEMENT

And you are correct that an updated proposal invalidates the previous contact unless it was signed fully. Your email is evidence that it was not fully signed before you voided it. You’ve handled this wonderfully.. There’s probably no management company delay at all, and they’re just hustling you.

The__Riker__Maneuver − NTA. So let me get this straight. You paid early each month.. The management company took your money and paid the landlord in a less than timely manner each month. The landlord got rightfully pissed and the management company threw you under the bus and blamed you for the late payments.

THEN...they voided your lease and tried to send you a new lease for $100 more a month and told you that the extra money was to make up for their incompetence? So basically, they ripped up the lease you signed and sent you a new one...and were then going to turn around,

ADVERTISEMENT

and pocket that $100 a month and just start paying the landlord on time like they should have in the first place.. Yeah totally not your problem. I would however, contact that landlord privately and tell them exactly what happened and suggest they find a new management company

telekelley − Hell, no, you are NTA. You are smart. Good luck in your new place!

GreekAmericanDom − NTA. The were pulling a bait and switch on you, invalidating any agreement you had with them. Serves them f**king right.

ADVERTISEMENT

DinaFelice − NTA. They tried a bait-and-switch on you and you are under no obligation to accept (regardless of whether it was intentional or just poor planning on their part). BTW, imagine if you couldn't afford the extra money...they would have left you 'high and dry' and scrambling to figure something out last minute

angelcat00 − They wanted an extra $100 for the 'inconvenience' of doing their job on time?. NTA. They got greedy and it came back to bite them.

Amiedeslivres − NTA. The time to raise any issues was before sending you the first new lease. They didn’t sign that, you declined the new offer that superseded it, your lease was up, you owe them nothing, legally or morally. Morally, they’re assholes because they left you in a position of having just days to scramble around and get moved if you didn’t accept the new terms.

ADVERTISEMENT

These Redditors rallied behind the OP, applauding their savvy escape from a shady deal. Some called it a scam, others a management fumble, but all agreed the landlord’s loss wasn’t the OP’s burden. Yet, do these fiery takes capture the full picture, or are they just fueling the drama?

This tale of lease limbo leaves us marveling at the OP’s quick wit and resolve. Faced with a management company’s sneaky tactics, they turned the tables, securing a swankier condo and a sweeter deal. It’s a reminder that knowing your rights can transform a sticky situation into a triumph. But it also sparks questions about fairness in the rental game—where do we draw the line between business and ethics? Share your thoughts below: What would you do if a landlord tried to pull a fast one on you?

Share this post

Related Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *