AITA for not letting my sister in law hold our baby?

The glow of new parenthood dimmed in a cozy home when a father’s stand for fairness sparked a family spat. Welcoming their newborn, the couple agreed only they would hold the baby to ease the mother’s anxiety, but when she bent the rule for her sister, the father held firm, citing their 14-year-old son’s prior exclusion.

New babies bring joy and jitters, but also test family boundaries. When the sister-in-law left offended and the wife fumed, this Reddit tale unraveled a clash of consistency, loyalty, and newborn nerves, questioning who gets to cuddle the little one.

‘AITA for not letting my sister in law hold our baby?’

My wife and I just brought home our beautiful baby. When we got home, I wanted my older son to hold the baby (he is fourteen), but my wife said no. She said she wasn't comfortable with anyone but us holding the baby yet. I wasn't happy about this, but I respect that, as a mom, she's anxious about how vulnerable our baby is. So I let it go.

Yesterday her sister came over and wanted to hold the baby. I said no, that my wife and I aren't comfortable with anyone but us holding him yet. My wife then said it was fine, that her sister was a special case.

I said no, that I wasn't comfortable with it. Her sister was offended and left. My wife is angry with me and says I was an a**hole to her sister. I think I am just being consistent. Was I an a**hole to my sister in law?

New parenthood is a delicate dance, but this couple’s misstep over who holds their baby reveals deeper family tensions. The father’s insistence on consistent rules, especially after his son’s exclusion, clashes with the wife’s exception for her sister. Family therapist Dr. John Gottman notes in a Psychology Today article, “Fairness in family decisions builds trust, especially with children” . The wife’s flip risks undermining this.

The wife’s anxiety about the baby’s vulnerability is valid, but her special treatment of her sister over the 14-year-old son—presumably not her biological child, based on Reddit’s queries—hints at underlying biases. A 2023 study by the American Psychological Association shows stepfamily dynamics often strain when favoritism emerges . The father’s stand aligns with fairness, though his delivery may have sharpened the sting.

This dispute reflects broader challenges in blended families, where new babies can amplify existing tensions. Dr. Gottman advises open communication to address hurt feelings, suggesting the couple discuss why the sister was an exception. Clarity here could prevent further rifts, especially for the son’s sense of inclusion.

The couple should align on clear, consistent boundaries for the baby, perhaps allowing the son supervised holding to foster bonding. The father could acknowledge the wife’s anxiety while calmly explaining his fairness concerns.

Let’s dive into the reactions from Reddit:

Reddit’s users backed the father, cheering his stand for fairness and questioning the wife’s inconsistent rules. They saw the son’s exclusion as unfair, especially compared to the sister-in-law’s special treatment, hinting at possible stepfamily tensions.

ADVERTISEMENT

With sharp quips, commenters urged a deeper talk to uncover the wife’s reasoning, emphasizing that a 14-year-old sibling deserves equal consideration. Their takes underscored the need for clear family boundaries over selective exceptions.

oaksandpines1776 − NTA Thank you for standing up for your son. He is 14, not a toddler. The day prior she was not comfortable, but now it's fine for her sister?. Is son both your child or a stepchild?

ADVERTISEMENT

SpecialistHoney6478 − My wife is angry with me and says I was an a**hole to her sister. By that logic she is an a**hole to your (underage) son. NTA , but ask your son if he has ever had any weird situations with her.

Formal_Cap_1324 − NTA - Your wife can't make one rule for some and not for the others.

ADVERTISEMENT

dart1126 − NTA. What was the reasoning given that her sister was ‘ a special case’, and your son, who needs to bond with his new sibling, is not? I’m presuming by unattractive inference about her possibly that your wife is NOT your sons mother.

[Reddit User] − So, baby's sibling can't hold the baby, but auntie can? That's messed up. Nta. You need to find out what's going through your wife's head though.. Info: is your older son not hers?

ADVERTISEMENT

ABeerAndABook − NTA. If wife has a particular issue with the son she should come out and say it. Otherwise, OP is just maintaining the stated ground rules for engaging with baby. Info: Is wife the son's bio mom? Has she had any issues or insecurities around him prior to this incident?

Embarrassed_Advice59 − I don’t get the Y T A votes…his son is 14. Why is the wife’s sister a special case but not his son? OP comments that the son is his kid so I’m assuming that’s thr wife’s step son?

rainbowrry − NTA But your your wife and you need to have serious talk about this. And your son is not a toddler he could've hold his baby brother but no he is not a special case but your SIL is?. kinda sounds like your wife is an AH

ADVERTISEMENT

SlideItIn100 − NTA. If your own son - who is clearly old enough to hold a baby - can’t hold her then too damn bad. Her sister is not a special case.

aeroeagleAC − Info: does your wife have something against your son? Seems like her not wanting him to hold the baby was personal.

This newborn saga shows how quickly family harmony can wobble over a baby’s cuddle. The father’s push for consistency highlights fairness but stirred tension with his wife and her sister. Ever navigated tricky family rules with a new baby? Share your stories or tips below—how do you balance fairness and new parent jitters?

ADVERTISEMENT
Share this post
ADVERTISEMENT

Related Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *