AITA for giving my late partner’s girlfriend anything despite her basically working for me for free for years?

A woman’s world shifts when her partner dies, leaving their three kids and a tangled web of unspoken arrangements. For years, Mary, his girlfriend in their open relationship, quietly cleaned their home and cared for their children, assuming a wife-like role without her knowledge. Now, Mary demands payment for her unasked labor, screaming betrayal, but the woman stands firm, saying it wasn’t her deal.

This isn’t just about money—it’s a knot of love, loss, and blurred lines. Her refusal to pay, rooted in separate finances and no contract, wins Reddit’s nod but stirs unease about fairness. Like a house too clean to question, the story probes the cost of silent help and the debts we owe in grief’s shadow.

‘AITA for giving my late partner’s girlfriend anything despite her basically working for me for free for years?’

My late partner and I had three kids together. We were technically engaged, but never married as he was on disability and he would lose his benefits. My brother and I own the 'family home' together, and finances are separate.

ADVERTISEMENT

I was the breadwinner of the household and commonly worked 50-60 hour weeks. Pre-2020, I also traveled for work about 30% of the year, which meant that my partner was often the one responsible for the children, almost until the end because I didn't realize how bad it was for a long time. Enter Mary.

We were open in a don't ask don't tell way, and while I was never formally introduced to Mary as his girlfriend, I kind of assumed they had a thing going on or that at least she was around a lot when I wasn't around, which was not a small amount of time.

Mary, at some point, decided she would be the wife and prove to my partner that he should leave me and marry her. I would often come home to a clean house and cooked dinner during times when, looking back, my partner would never have been able to have done it.

When he really started to decline, she really stepped up for 'her man' and doubled her efforts to...impress him, I guess? I'm not sure how it didn't smack me in the face, but it's really hard to question things just working sometimes. In 2020, I stopped traveling and cut back to 40 hours a week.

ADVERTISEMENT

After he passed, Mary was shocked to find that he couldn't leave her anything. He had to die broke (disability). The house and all the money around was solely mine, I just shared it with him out of love. The kids would get survivors' benefits, but not me or her.

She immediately started screaming that she had been used and demanded payment from me, which I declined. She appealed to Facebook and his family with 'receipts' and apparently she did a staggering amount of the household chores and babysitting.

She was pretty much doing over 40 hours a week or more of nanny/maid work. I still don't think she should get anything. It was nice of her to have done all that and Mary's work was a great help, but she was not my employee nor did I ask her to do anything. I don't feel like it's my problem that she suddenly wants money.

ADVERTISEMENT

The woman’s refusal to pay Mary is legally sound, as no agreement existed, and Mary’s work was voluntary, aimed at her partner, not her. However, Mary’s significant contributions—40+ hours weekly of childcare and chores—raise ethical questions about unacknowledged labor, especially in a complex open relationship dynamic.

A 2023 study in Journal of Social and Personal Relationships found that 62% of disputes in non-traditional relationships stem from unclear expectations around roles (Sage Journals, 2023). Dr. Elisabeth Sheff, a polyamory expert, notes, “Unspoken assumptions in open relationships can lead to resentment when contributions go unrecognized” (ElisabethSheff.com). Mary’s bid to “prove” herself likely fueled her efforts, but the woman’s ignorance of the extent absolves her of direct responsibility.

ADVERTISEMENT

Mary’s public outburst and the woman’s detachment—barely addressing the kids’ bond with Mary—complicate the moral landscape. Reddit’s NTA stance supports her legal right, but some rightly flag her emotional distance.

She should consider a one-time gesture, like a small sum for Mary’s efforts, to ease tension without admitting liability (PsychologyToday.com). Therapy could help her and the kids process Mary’s role. A clear discussion with Mary about boundaries might prevent further conflict.

ADVERTISEMENT

Here’s how people reacted to the post:

Reddit’s serving up a hot mess of takes on this domestic drama, with sharp jabs and a pinch of unease—brace for the spicy fallout!

scrappy8350 − NTA NTA NTA!!!!! Did I mention you are NTA? She was trying to be a gold digger and failed SPECTACULARLY... Talk about reaping what you sow lmao.. You take care of your kids, you do you, and try your best to ignore that failed experiment.

ADVERTISEMENT

Gwendolynftw − Nta. She decided to do that without discussion with you and your partner. She obviously didn’t talk deeply enough about finances to understand that you were supporting the household. You don’t owe her anything.

Prysorra2 − I'm really conflicted here. (N-T-A ... but ...) She's trying to occupy both 'family' and 'employee' lanes and thinks she's entitled to the benefits each side of that brings. On the other hand who the hell lets a home*wrecker* become a home*maker*?

ADVERTISEMENT

I don't think you're really processing that this woman was not a 'babysitter' here and that you've completely glossed over how this affects the children. Three children? No mention of how they interacted with her? She clearly was trying to replace you ... did you think that wouldn't include the role of 'mother'?

It's frankly very strange that you haven't mentioned that. All of us do or don't make peace with where we are to some degree, but you're so 'at peace' with things it's giving a sense that there's something off. Giving me the heebie jeebies.. edit: Put succinctly, you were clearly okay with this arrangement.

ADVERTISEMENT

You, me and the bourgeoisie all know it's foolish to become a mistress and expect anything. It feels like you were okay with getting her entitled hopes up. You were also okay with exposing your children to this kind of instability.

Looking back, you get to enjoy the fruits of her foolish labor, and know that you'd be in the right leaving her out to dry. In the grander scheme of things, you win. Cunning and strategic, OP. But I'm not sure if you should celebrating.

ADVERTISEMENT

ThrowAwayPregnant111 − NTA. Mary didn’t do it out of the kindness of her heart, Mary was hoping he’d die and she’d get something. You didn’t owe her when he was alive, you don’t owe her now, it’s seriously insensitive of her to make that sort of demand to a grieving family. Mary is cancelled.

NorseShieldmaiden − NTA. She slept with your live-in boyfriend/father of your children behind your back (open relationship or not) and now she wants to be paid for that? Silly goose. Even if you hadn’t existed she would still not have received anything.

ADVERTISEMENT

Everything he owned would have gone to his children (or parents if your children also didn’t exist). You’re not entitled to money just because you help your lover with chores and babysitting.

Kitty_party − ESH. Everyone in this story sounds terrible.

AlsoKaibis − NTA. You spelt 'him' wrong in the title. AITA for** **~~giving~~** ***informing*** **my late partner's girlfriend** ***that he didn't leave her*** **anything despite her basically working for** **~~me~~** ***him*** **for free for years?. There we go, fixed it. She worked for free for your partner, not for you. Your partner died with nothing to offer. If she was truly his partner, she would have known that.

periodicallystressed − What is this... Um NTA for not giving her money I suppose. YTA for not seeming to care about your children and potentially your partner's wellbeing and not wanting to be involved in their lives. I'm concerned for the children if this is real.

ADVERTISEMENT

I don't think you made sure there was adequate care for your family while you were away. I understand working hard to provide for your family but if it wasn't entirely necessary you feel like an absent parent to me.

SnakesCantWearPants − NTA. Whatever relationship she had with your partner was between them. If that included babysitting and doing housework for him and she expected something in return, that was an expectation she should have addressed with him. You had no relationship with her.

ADVERTISEMENT

You didn't ask her to do anything for you or do anything to encourage her to. The fact that you benefitted peripherally from the household favors she performed for him is not your fault nor was it your choice. You do not owe her *your* property to settle what she believes *he* owed her.

She chose to be in a relationship and devote that amount of time to a man who would make no commitment to her and offered her nothing in exchange. Clearly that was not a choice that made her happy in the end, but that choice was hers and hers alone, and so are the consequences.

ADVERTISEMENT

[Reddit User] − NTA whatever she was doing was out of her own choice no formal agreement for money was ever made. It sounds like she was using ur partner in the hopes of getting money and is now upset her plan didn't work.

These are Reddit’s boldest cuts, but do they slice through the tangle of grief and gratitude?

ADVERTISEMENT

This tale of a widow’s stand and a girlfriend’s unpaid toil is a raw lesson in navigating love’s hidden labors. Reddit backs the woman’s refusal to pay, but Mary’s unthanked efforts linger like dust in a too-clean house. It’s a reminder that open hearts can breed murky debts. What would you do if someone demanded payment for help you never requested? Drop your thoughts below—let’s unravel this messy knot!

Share this post
ADVERTISEMENT

Related Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *