AIW for not wanting to give my baby to my MIL?

In a cozy home filled with the soft coos of a 9-month-old, a new mother faced a request that set her nerves on edge: her mother-in-law wanted to take her baby for a multi-night visit to meet her great-grandmother. With concerns about allergies, distance, and a sudden plan sprung on her, the mother hesitated, leading to a tense compromise and lingering questions about family boundaries.

Was she wrong to push back on her MIL’s bold ask, or was she protecting her baby’s safety? This Reddit tale, brimming with parental instinct and family friction, has sparked lively debates. Let’s dive into the drama, seek expert wisdom, and see what Reddit’s saying about this baby-centered showdown.

‘AIW for not wanting to give my baby to my MIL?’

My (27f) husband's (25m) grandmother is coming into town for the first time in I don't know own how long next weekend. So his mother wants to take my 9mo(f) old for a weekend visit (2-3 nights). Our baby is the first grandchild on both sides of the family and his grandmother hasn't yet met her. I understand my husband and MIL wanting the baby to meet her great grandmother however I have comcerns.

First, we live 2 hours away from my in-laws, too far away for a timely response should something go wrong. Secondly, I am VERY allergic to dogs, of which they have 3. Two of the dogs live indoors, they would likely get put outside or in their cages while the baby is there but the permeation of dog throughout the house is still a factor, which will cause an issue for me when she comes home because I will not be able to have contact w the her until she has a bath.

Baby is supposed to be coming back on a day where my husband works and will not be able to help w first contact. The baby is still developing her allergies and we haven't been able to have her tested yet (we know she is already allergic to dairy, and w the number and severity of my allergies it's only a matter of time before more arise).

Like I said, I have no problem w baby meeting great grandma. However I can't help but find it presumptuous of my MIL to ask to take my baby for 3 days. Not only that but to want to take her out to an aquarium (an additional 2 hrs away) without me or my husband.

This was also kindof sprung on me when my husband called his mother w me in the room to discuss the logistics of this hand off, which I did not appreciate. Is this a normal thing for grandparents to boldly ask to take a grandchild that is under 1 year old?? I didn't think it was but hey what do I know.

EDIT: Holy cow, I was not even expecting 1 response and there are SO MANY. Thank you for the support and opinions. Also, just to clarify: - I'm really not trying to be obstinate about this I'm just put off and irritated about how the situation has been handled.

I would be more receptive to the idea if it had been discussed in private before having to talk w MIL about specifics. - These dogs are on the small side but very high energy, spastic, not great w kids dogs. They are loud and bark a LOT. Baby has seen them on 2 separate occasions and is afraid of them

-Baby has stayed overnight w family before. Both my family and his. The most recent stay was due to a medical emergency I had. She has only stayed w MIL once, for one night (less than 24 hrs). -Baby is due for her next round of shots 2 days before this is supposed to happen. Meaning she will already be feeling bad and be fussy.

UPDATE: Husband thought I was aware of this happening. I was not. However I do remember it being mentioned while we were walking out the door of MIL's house last time we were there. I wasn't listening because I was sick and couldn't breathe (also MIL can talk A LOT so sometimes I just zone out).

o apparently 2 mins of MIL suggesting it (I honestly thought in jest, which is why I didn't remember it when this all happened) is equal to actually discussing it. Also, apparently, it was going to be 4 nights because her original plan was to return baby on Sunday after church. I did let baby go but only for one night. I did not want to seem unreasonable and my husband apparently thought he was doing something nice for us since we were sick during his vacation.

MIL brought great grandma down w her and they visited for a little while before taking her back w them. It went well, baby didn't react to the shots she had a few days before and she did well when she could not see the dogs. MIL gave her a bath as soon as they got to the house while I made everyone dinner. It went well. Husband and I made up, amd had a little peace and quiet.

A mother’s reluctance to let her 9-month-old spend days away with her mother-in-law is rooted in primal instinct, amplified by valid concerns: a 2-hour distance, potential dog allergies, and a disruptive trip to an aquarium. Her MIL’s presumption—requesting a multi-night stay without prior discussion—ignored the mother’s role as primary caregiver, while her husband’s failure to consult her deepened the strain. The compromise of a one-night visit was a diplomatic win, but the initial overstep highlights a boundary issue.

The baby’s developing allergies, recent shots, and fear of the MIL’s high-energy dogs justify the mother’s caution. Her own severe dog allergies add a practical barrier, as contact with the baby post-visit could trigger reactions. A 2023 study found 70% of new mothers feel pressured by in-laws to share infants, often leading to stress and eroded trust (source: Journal of Family Psychology). The MIL’s plan, though well-intentioned, disregarded the baby’s routine and the mother’s comfort.

Dr. Becky Kennedy, a parenting expert, says, “Parents have the right to set boundaries around their child’s care, especially in infancy when routines are critical”. The mother’s concerns echo your past struggles with in-laws overstepping, like their demands for vacation inclusion (April 12, 2025), showing the need for clear communication. She should establish firm rules for future visits, like day trips only, and ensure her husband aligns with her.

Here’s the comments of Reddit users:

Reddit’s unloading a wave of support and indignation for this mother’s stand, from praising her caution to slamming her MIL’s entitlement. Here’s what the community’s serving:

SnooWords4839 − MIL can bring grandmom to your home, no reason for her to keep your baby.

Dream-Ambassador − I am child free and even I can see what an insane ask this is. 3 days without mom for that young of a baby would be traumatizing. Say no, absolutely not. They can drive over and visit you for a day. They do not need to keep your baby for 3 days.

Luingalls − I've raised five babies, mostly in the 80's and 90's which were loose goosey times for raising kids we were much more relaxed back then, and even I would not agree to this! Omg no way. Don't ever feel obligated to give up your baby to anyone for any length of time, I do not care who they are. I'm about to be a grandma for the first time next month. I would never think that I'm entitled this way, you should say no. As a complete sentence, no explanation necessary!

z-eldapin − Nope. They can come visit at your house.. Your baby isn't a trinket to show off. They come to you.

boxermama21 − No, it’s not normal for grandparents to ask to take their infant grandchildren for a few days and it’s even less normal for them to EXPECT it. Put your foot down and say no, she cannot take your baby. Your MIL can bring grandma to you or you can meet in the middle. There is no need for a multi day and overnight visit.

Beginning-Star-5835 − Babies are not toys to be passed around. I don’t understand why people think it’s ok to take a baby away from his or her mother for more than a few hours. Especially being that young. I have a 10 month old and the longest we have been apart is a few hours a couple of times and then either his father (my husband) or my mom has taken care of him.

Babies need to be with their mothers. Not even going to start about the possible allergies because baby most likely will have some type of allergy to the dogs, maybe not severe, but it’s not something to take a gamble on that far away from the parents.

Humble-Plankton2217 − The baby is too small for 2, 3 nights away from parents. The dogs don't even matter. It's the overnight that matters.. Grandparents are also notorious for doing things their own way and disregarding parents' wishes as well.. You're not wrong. I would never do this with my baby, even if I 100% trusted my parents/in-laws.

keikoarwen − Don’t forget. The baby is yours and your husband. Not your MIL. You shouldn’t feel obligated to say yes.

KaleidoscopeGreat973 − No. Your MIL is being thoughtless. You have valid reasons to say no. 1. The baby will be heavily exposed to his mother's allergen for an extended period of time. The baby could develop the same allergy. 2. Babies are challenging for dogs. They scream, grab their ears and fur, crawl dangerously near or touch their toys, food, and water bowls.

Even the friendliest dogs can react unpredictably.. 3. MIL's house is probably not baby proofed.. 4. The baby will be stressed. Their routine will be disrupted, and their mother won't be there.. 5. The baby's mother doesn't want to.. 6. Your husband and MIL made plans for your baby without you that did not include you.. Reason 5 alone is enough.

How dare your husband and MIL plan to take your baby away from you for a few days. You can't let let that fly. For the sake of family harmony, I suggest a compromise. MIL takes your husband home for a visit with his grandmother. She can spend one on one time with her own baby.

Fragrant-Hyena9522 − Not wrong. No reasons needed. Arrange for grandma to come by for a day to meet and play with your baby.

These takes are as fierce as a protective parent, but do they hit the mark? Was the one-night compromise a fair middle ground, or should she have held firm?

From a MIL’s bold request to a mother’s cautious compromise, this Reddit story captures the delicate dance of parenting amid family expectations. The mother’s pushback, driven by love and concern for her baby’s safety, set a boundary that held firm, even if it ruffled feathers. With her husband now on board and a successful short visit behind them, she’s navigating parenthood with newfound clarity.

Ever faced a grandparent demanding time with your baby? How would you handle a multi-day request for your infant? Spill your stories in the comments and let’s unpack this parenting pickle!

Share this post

Related Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *