AITA for how I explained to SIL that she wouldn’t be my son’s godmother?

A family gathering meant to celebrate a newborn’s christening took an unexpected turn, leaving one dad caught in a whirlwind of hurt feelings. Picture a sunny afternoon, a cozy church buzzing with relatives, and a proud couple ready to honor their son’s future with cherished traditions. For this father, choosing godparents was a heartfelt nod to family ties—one relative from his side, one from his wife’s.

Yet, what should’ve been a joyful moment unraveled when his sister-in-law felt sidelined, her hopes of being godmother dashed. The sting of misunderstanding hit hard, as the dad tried to explain his choice with care, only to see tensions flare. Readers might feel the weight of his dilemma: how do you balance personal values with family harmony? This tale dives into the messy beauty of relationships, where good intentions sometimes spark unintended drama.

‘AITA for how I explained to SIL that she wouldn’t be my son’s godmother?’

My wife and I aren’t practicing Catholics per se but we do follow certain traditions such as christening ceremonies for our children. Some people choose a married couple to be godparents; when I was a baby, my parents chose my uncle and his then-wife, and they divorced when I was still a child and I lost all contact with my former-aunt and basically grew up ‘without’ a godmother.

So my wife and I always thought it was best to choose one of our relatives, and one from each side of our family. For our second son, I chose my brother as godfather, and my wife chose a cousin of hers as godmother. When I called my brother to invite him, he assumed I was asking both him and his wife, and there was this awkward moment when I had to explain to him my SIL wouldn’t be the godmother.

He seemed fine with it, but my SIL didn’t attend the ceremony and my brother later told me she was a bit upset. So I called her later that day just so there wouldn’t be any ill feelings, and I briefly explained our reasoning, including my own personal history with my uncle's divorce.

And then she got really mad, as if I was implying I believe she and my brother will get divorced down the road, which was not my point AT ALL. She also said just as couples might get divorced, anyone can also lose touch with a blood-relative, which is objectively truth, but again, not the point we were making here.. I’m sad that what was supposed to be this happy family moment is now tainted somehow.

Navigating family traditions can feel like tiptoeing through a minefield of emotions. In this story, the dad’s attempt to clarify his godparent choice turned a joyful occasion into a family rift. The core issue? A clash between personal values and unspoken expectations. He and his wife chose one relative from each family to foster balance, but the sister-in-law’s assumption of inclusion led to hurt feelings, worsened by a poorly landed explanation.

The dad’s reasoning—rooted in his childhood experience with a godparent’s divorce—was meant to clarify, not offend. Yet, it struck a nerve, implying instability in his brother’s marriage. The sister-in-law’s reaction, while intense, reflects a deeper issue: feeling excluded from a family role can sting, especially when traditions carry emotional weight. Both sides have valid perspectives—she craved inclusion; he sought fairness.

This scenario mirrors broader family dynamics, where communication gaps fuel conflict. According to a 2018 study by the American Psychological Association, miscommunication in families often stems from differing assumptions about roles (apa.org/topics/family-relationships). Here, a simple “we wanted both families represented” might’ve avoided the divorce tangent, which felt like a personal jab to the sister-in-law.

Dr. John Gottman, a renowned relationship expert, notes, “The way a conversation starts often predicts how it ends” (gottman.com/blog/the-four-horsemen-criticism). Applied here, the dad’s earnest but clumsy explanation opened the door to defensiveness. Gottman’s research suggests approaching sensitive talks with clear, neutral language to prevent escalation. The dad’s intent was to mend fences, but his divorce example shifted focus to a perceived slight, highlighting the need for tact.

So, what’s the takeaway? Clear communication is key when traditions stir emotions. The dad could’ve stuck to the “one from each side” rationale, avoiding personal anecdotes that invite misinterpretation. For readers facing similar tensions, experts suggest affirming everyone’s value—like saying, “We’d love your role as an aunt to shine.” Open dialogue, perhaps over coffee, could rebuild trust.

Here’s how people reacted to the post:

Reddit’s got a knack for serving up raw, unfiltered takes, and this story brought out some spicy ones! Here’s a peek at what the community had to say—candid, witty, and all over the map. These are the hot opinions from Reddit, but do they nail the full picture? Maybe family drama’s just messier than a single verdict can capture.

miggovortensens − I think the explanation that you and your wife both wanted to invite someone from each side of your families would suffice without the ‘divorce’ example, but ultimately your SIL is the AH for even requiring an explanation and being salty about this in the first place. I mean, skipping a nephew's christening - and when your husband is the godfather! - is next level petty in my book. She made it all about herself.. NTA.

Excellent_Basil_9423 − NTA. Coming from a practicing Catholic Family I never witnessed a married couple being Godparents. I have always seen one person on each side of the family be a godparent. As for your sister-in-law, she needs to grow up. It's not about her and her behavior is exhausting. You should have lit a candle for your brother while in church for strength.

swoopingturtle − ESH. You should’ve left it at “we want one relative from each side of the family” and she made it all about her

AnAussiebum − NTA - but you really messed up telling her your uncle story so soft TA for that. Why didn't you just say 'I got to choose the godfather and my wife got to choose the godmother. We thought that would make it fair for us. That's the only reason why we didn't choose brother and his wife and just brother'. Now you're going to called TA for implying that brother and SIL may not have been chosen together because you don't think they will last.

LeafMeAlone-ImBushed − Slight ESH.  You were tone deaf in your explanation. A simple “we want to represent both sides” would have sufficed and if you had left it at that, any further hurt feelings would not be on you.  SIL was being presumptuous to think she automatically got godmother but with your explanation, I can completely understand the hurt feelings.  I would especially understand if she already has underlying doubts about her acceptance into the family. 

thenexttimebandit − Mild YTA you should have said you wanted one person from each side of the family.

DinaFelice − I'm dying to ask your SIL what explanation *would* have been acceptable to her... After all, she's not a child, and any mature person would probably understand that it's similar to the kinds of explanations that are possible in a romantic breakup: All of them basically boil down

That's why it is inherently risky -- and often rude or AH-ish -- for someone to ask why they weren't included in an invitation (in this case, an invitation to be a godparent)... The person who didn't invite you to participate might actually tell you the truth.

NTA. Under the circumstances, I think you were just about as tactful as you could be, pointing to a long ago situation involving other people, rather than any particular shortcoming in *her* behavior or personality

Cael_NaMaor − 1. Don't let that taint the action of godparenting your kid.. 2. The divorce part was unnecessary, & could sound hurtful.. 3. Not the a**hole, just a bit of a doof.

whydoweneedthiscrap − Oh holy s**t you called her and made it SO MUCH WORSE SAYING THAT wtf that was insensitive and such an a**hole thing to say! You just told her you didn’t think she was staying married ffs “its not personal, just my experience with divorce we didn’t want to risk it “ 😂😂 tf man YTA

Cherry_clafoutis − YTA. You could have just said there are two godparent roles. You and your wife picked one person each that you are close to for the role. It was nothing personal against SIL and you hope she will be an active aunt in your childs life. Instead you told her that you didn't pick her because you don't feel confident in their marriage will last. It is a genuine worry about the social skills of Redditors that there are mostly NTA answers. 

This christening clash reminds us how fast good intentions can spiral into family feuds. The dad’s heart was in the right place, but words have a funny way of twisting under pressure. It’s a classic case of love for tradition meeting the chaos of human feelings. What’s the lesson? Maybe it’s about speaking clearly and listening harder. What would you do if you were in his shoes—stick to your guns or smooth things over with a different approach? Drop your thoughts below and let’s keep this conversation rolling!

Share this post

Related Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *