AITA for assuming my SIL was not coming to the barbecue?

Under the warm skies of a typical summer weekend, anticipation for a family barbecue filled the air. A simple text message was meant to coordinate a relaxed gathering, yet it inadvertently sparked a mix-up that left one family member feeling overlooked. What was intended as an invitation for an entire family turned into a miscommunication that questioned who was, in fact, invited.

In the hustle of modern family dynamics, assumptions can lead to unintentional exclusion. When Ruby replied that her husband Nic and son Jack wouldn’t be in town due to other commitments, it was taken at face value—until the next day. Suddenly, the silence left by an unspoken “yes” from Ruby became the root of unexpected tension. This incident offers a glimpse into how subtle differences in communication can turn a carefree invitation into a lingering dispute.

‘AITA for assuming my SIL was not coming to the barbecue?’

My brother Nic is married to Ruby. They have a son, Jack. A couple days ago I texted Nic to ask him if they’d like to come round for a barbecue on Saturday. Ruby texted back the following: Hey, it’s Ruby, Nic is working on his bike. He and Jack are at a race this weekend, so not around. So I replied: Ok no worries! We’ll catch you guys another time.

I’ll text Jack but please tell him good luck from us! And that was that. Except that wasn’t that because Nic called me yesterday to say Ruby is upset that she was “uninvited” from the barbecue. I am so confused. She said Nic and Jack weren’t around, meaning the majority of the family unit wasn’t able to come so I assumed we’d just see them another time.

Is that weird? If she had asked to come, like said “they’re at a race this weekend but do you kind if I still stop by?” I wouldn’t have said no. But she didn’t say anything. Ruby is a nice person, and a fantastic mother, but she can be a bit funny about stuff like this so I think this is just another overreaction from her. Did I actually mess up?

Family gatherings can often be a minefield of misunderstandings, where even a well-intentioned invitation is subject to assumptions. The host in this case interpreted Ruby’s message as a full cancellation for the entire family, not realizing that the lack of explicit confirmation might have masked a desire on her part to attend. This situation reveals how easily subtle language cues can be misunderstood in digital communication.

Crucially, effective communication is the glue that holds relationships together. As relationship expert Dr. John Gottman advises, “In any relationship, it is essential to avoid assumptions by asking clarifying questions to ensure that every party’s intentions are clearly understood.” This perspective underscores that a simple follow-up message might have prevented the misunderstanding. It isn’t about fault but about bridging the communication gap with a little extra effort, especially when inviting loved ones to shared moments.

Another dimension is the emotional impact of feeling excluded during family gatherings—events that are meant to bring people closer. Ruby’s reaction, though seemingly overblown, highlights how small omissions can accumulate into feelings of isolation. In our digital age, where messages can be terse or misinterpreted, taking the time to confirm attendance could mean the difference between a joyful get-together and unintended hurt feelings. Clear, open, and empathetic communication is key.

Furthermore, the scenario illustrates broader societal challenges in family dynamics. Modern families are often juggling multiple roles and commitments, making communication more prone to errors. A quick follow-up—such as asking, “Will you be joining us even if you’re on your own?”—could have provided the clarity needed. It reminds us that even minor details in a casual text can have a significant emotional impact if left unaddressed.

Finally, the takeaway for anyone hosting events is to confirm attendance explicitly, rather than presuming silence equals a negative response. By encouraging responses that clearly state one’s intentions, hosts can avoid similar misunderstandings. In times when family ties are essential, refining our communication habits can help transform potential conflicts into opportunities for deeper connection and understanding.

Here’s the input from the Reddit crowd:

Here are some hot takes from the Reddit community—candid and humorous. Many commenters expressed that Ruby’s message left too much room for assumption and that a simple follow-up would have cleared the air immediately. Others pointed out that in the absence of an explicit confirmation, the host’s response was a natural conclusion, albeit unfortunate. This blend of opinions underscores that miscommunications are common and that, in the end, a conversation could be the best remedy.

GeneralOddities − Eh. NAH. You assumed she wouldn't want to come without her husband and son, but she did. Your text clearly seemed dismissive to her. You could've asked if *she* was still interested in coming after her reply, but that's more of an oversight on your part and doesn't reach a**hole levels, IMO. Is this a Mother's Day barbecue, by any chance?

If her family is going to be away this weekend, she may have been feeling a double sting - alone on Mother's Day, and then excluded from the bbq. I feel for her. We're just human, after all. I would suggest reaching out to her and reassuring her that she's always welcome. Sounds like you two have a good relationship. Just make up and move on (and invite her to the barbecue).

[Reddit User] − NTA. If I'd received a response like that, which was full of negatives, I'd have taken it as a general no from the family group too. You invited them all to the BBQ and she just told you who wasn't going. She never actually accepted your invite at all, so her attendance was neither confirmed or not. She should've said she was coming.

v_a_n_d_e_l_a_y − NTA. How do some people fail at basic communication and then get upset about it?.

Auntie-Mam69 − NTA. You didn't think of asking if she wanted to come, but equally, with family, one would expect her to say that while her husband and son couldn't make it she'd be glad to come—to which you would have said yes, do come. She's being a bit precious here.

Fragrant-Donut2871 − NAH. From her wording I would also not expect her to come, though I personally probably would have followed up with asking if she were coming as I don't like ambiguous messages and have understood them wrongly too often, so now I just ask for clarification..

I can understand why Ruby feels uninvited, but to be fair: she wasn't being clear in her communication. What you can do, as there still seems to be time: invite Ruby, and if she's there, have a chat with her about how you both can avoid such miscommunications in future.

Oh-its-Tuesday − NAH. If she wanted to go she should’ve said “Nic & Jack have a race this weekend so won’t be around, but I would love to come. Can I bring anything?”. Her stating the other 2 wouldn’t be coming would’ve led me to believe that all 3 of them were going to be gone, them to race & her to cheer them on.

So your comment of “we’ll catch you guys another time” isn’t disinviting her, she never clearly stated she wanted to come. Heck even after your reply she could’ve stated “oh, I didn’t mean I couldn’t come, just that the boys will be out of town. I’d love to see you all”. This is all a miscommunication, mostly on Ruby’s part for not being clear and speaking her mind. 

Broad_Respond_2205 − But that's what she said. You ask if they (as in the 3 people) are coming, and she said no. What else are you supposed to get from that?. NTA

CaptainMalForever − NTA You aren't a mind reader. If she had said, Jack and Nic aren't around, so it's just me, you would have known that she wanted to come and/or planned on coming. As it was, there was no indication of her planning to come.

Choice-Intention-926 − NAH. She said two people weren’t coming but also didn’t state that she’d be there. “Nic and son are busy but I’ll be there.” Is a simple thing to say. She said they weren’t coming and didn’t say anything else. It’s not wrong to assume she’s not coming.

[Reddit User] − NTA, sounds like just a miscommunication. She canceled on Nice and their son’s behalf but in no way confirmed her own attendance, so I see that being an easy assumption that she was also out.

In conclusion, this family barbecue misadventure reminds us that in today’s fast-paced digital communications, assumptions can easily lead to unintended exclusion. While the misunderstanding may seem minor, it has significant emotional repercussions that ripple through family dynamics. What would you do if you found yourself in a similar situation? Share your experiences and insights so we can all learn how to keep our invitations—and our relationships—warm and welcoming.

Share this post

Related Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *