Chosen Family vs. Birth Family: My SIL Doesn’t Understand My Pain
The concept of family is often portrayed as an unbreakable bond, forged by blood and shared history. However, for some, the reality of their birth family is one of pain, abandonment, and lasting trauma. When faced with such a history, the decision to sever ties and prioritize one’s own well-being is deeply personal and often met with varying degrees of understanding from others.
In this Reddit story, a woman who experienced significant trauma at the hands of her birth family finds herself in a disagreement with her sister-in-law, who believes she should be more forgiving and understanding towards those who caused her so much pain. What happens when the narrative of blood being thicker than water clashes with the need for self-preservation? Is there an obligation to forgive and reconcile with a birth family, even when they have caused profound harm? This post delves into the complexities of family estrangement, the long-lasting impact of childhood trauma, and the right to define one’s own family on one’s own terms.
‘AITA for saying my birth parents are awful people and my birth siblings are old enough to realize that?’
The OP’s experience is a deeply traumatic one, marked by early separation from her siblings, the devastating news of being unwanted by her birth parents, and the added burden of being blamed for the stillbirth of her twin brother. This level of emotional neglect and blame in childhood can have profound and lasting effects on an individual’s sense of self-worth and their ability to form healthy attachments. The fact that the OP was able to heal and build a fulfilling life with her adoptive family and her husband is a testament to her resilience and strength.
The OP’s decision not to give her birth family a chance to be in her life is a valid and understandable one. As Dr. Judith Herman, a clinical professor of psychiatry and author of Trauma and Recovery, emphasizes, survivors of trauma have the right to choose who they allow into their lives and to prioritize their own safety and well-being. There is no obligation to forgive or reconcile with those who have caused significant harm, especially when there is no indication of genuine remorse or a willingness to take responsibility for their actions.
The SIL’s perspective, while perhaps coming from a place of wanting to see reconciliation, fails to acknowledge the depth of the OP’s trauma and the specific reasons for her estrangement. Suggesting that the OP should consider her birth parents’ trauma without acknowledging the trauma they inflicted on her is dismissive and invalidating of her experience.
Furthermore, implying that the OP should extend grace to her birth siblings simply because of their upbringing ignores the fact that they are now adults capable of understanding and potentially addressing the harm caused by their parents’ beliefs.
As Dr. Harriet Lerner, a clinical psychologist and author on family dynamics, points out, “Forgiveness is a process, not an event, and it’s something we do for ourselves, not for the person who hurt us.” The OP has already engaged in a significant process of healing and has found peace in her chosen family. There is no reason why she should be pressured to reopen old wounds for the sake of others’ expectations or a societal pressure to forgive.
The OP’s statement that her birth parents are “awful people” and that her birth siblings are old enough to realize this reflects her lived experience and her assessment of their character based on the information she has gathered. It is her right to have these feelings and to express them, especially in a conversation about her own life and her own boundaries.
Check out how the community responded:
The Reddit community has overwhelmingly supported the OP, with a resounding “NTA” (Not the A**hole) verdict. Commenters were highly critical of the SIL’s perspective, viewing it as insensitive and dismissive of the OP’s profound trauma. Many emphasized that the OP has every right to define her own family and to protect her peace and well-being by keeping her birth family at a distance.
The birth parents’ actions of blaming a six-year-old for her twin’s death and then choosing not to take her back after therapy were seen as particularly egregious. Commenters also pointed out that the birth siblings, now adults, bear some responsibility for their own beliefs and actions. The general consensus is that the OP’s feelings are valid, and she is not obligated to forgive or give a second chance to a birth family that caused her significant harm.
This Reddit story highlights the complex and deeply personal nature of family estrangement, particularly when it stems from childhood trauma and abandonment. The OP’s decision to prioritize her own healing and well-being by keeping her birth family at a distance is a valid one, rooted in her painful experiences.
The disagreement with her SIL underscores the challenges of understanding and respecting individual boundaries when it comes to family relationships. Is there ever an obligation to forgive one’s birth family, regardless of the harm they have caused? How should we approach conversations about family estrangement with sensitivity and respect for individual experiences? Share your thoughts and insights on the complexities of chosen versus birth family and the right to define one’s own path to healing.