AITA For Wanting To Give My Brother College Money Instead of Buying a House?

Imagine saving $2,000 as a teenager for your baby brother’s college fund, watching it grow to $23,000 over seventeen years, only to face a wrenching choice: keep your promise to help him avoid $40,000 in loans or use the money to buy a home for your growing family. That’s the heart-tugging dilemma one man faces as his wife, with one child and another on the way, argues their precarious finances need the funds to secure a stable future. His sister, worse off but committed to her half, plans to give her share, leaving him torn between a decades-old vow and his family’s pressing needs.

This Reddit saga dives into family loyalty, financial sacrifice, and tough choices. Is he wrong to prioritize his brother’s education, or is his wife’s plea for their kids’ stability the priority? Let’s unpack the story, get an expert’s take, and see how Reddit weighs this family crossroads.

‘AITA For Wanting To Give My Brother College Money Instead of Buying a House?’

A man’s promise to fund his brother’s college education clashes with his family’s housing needs. Here’s the full story from the Reddit post:

ADVERTISEMENT

When I was growing up, my older sister and I were poor. Our parents put food on the table, a roof over our heads and clothes on our backs, but that's about it. My sister and I couldn't afford college. She got married young and had two kids. Her husband is a good guy, but they have struggled with money.

My wife and I met when we were both 20, have one kid and one on the way. We also struggle with money, but to a lesser extent. With a new baby coming, we'll be just about breaking even every month. Seventeen years ago, my parents had another baby. For the sake of privacy, I'll call him Tom.

He's done well in school and has three college offers. Even with financial aid, he won't be able to afford to go somewhere even local, as our parents will not be able to support him at all. When Tom was born, I was 17 and my older sister was 19.

We both wanted to make sure that Tom would have the opportunity to go to College that we didn't have, so we saved as much money as we could for one year, put it into the stock market and planned to give it to Tom for College when he turned 18. We ended up saving $2000 each ($4,000 total).

ADVERTISEMENT

We each put our halves into separate TD Ameritrade accounts, and invested it all in a low risk fund. The money in each account is now worth nearly $23,000, so $45,000 total. Tom has been accepted to an amazing College to study engineering, and with financial aid, he'd need to take out about $40,000 in loans.

He would never do this because the fear of that debt is too much. My sister and I fully intend on keeping our promise and giving Tom the money to make sure he gets a better life than we've had. In many ways, he is our son as well as our brother. When I met my wife I told her that I'd put $2,000 aside for Tom when he got older. Last week, I told her how much it was worth now.

I probably should have updated her as the investment grew, but in my head, this money isn't mine, its Tom's. My wife thinks that Tom should get the money from my sister if she wants to give it to him, but not from me. This is because if we use my half to add to out current savings, we could finally afford to buy our first home. If prices increase even more, she thinks (reasonably) that we will never be able to buy.

ADVERTISEMENT

She thinks my obligation to our own children to provide a stable financial future is more important. She can see my side, but thinks without using this money to buy now, we may be renting precariously forever. I think my sister, who is worse off than we are, is keeping her promise, and this money was set aside for Tom before I met my wife. AITA?

This college fund dilemma is less about money and more about balancing long-held promises with immediate family obligations. The man’s commitment to his brother, rooted in shared hardship, reflects deep familial duty, but his wife’s concern for their children’s financial security is equally valid. The $23,000 could transform either Tom’s future or the family’s stability, forcing a zero-sum choice.

ADVERTISEMENT

Financial planner Suze Orman notes, “Family decisions about money require open communication and shared priorities.” A 2024 study in Journal of Family and Economic Issues found that 70% of couples report stress when financial goals conflict with extended family support. The wife’s lack of updates on the fund’s growth may fuel her sense of exclusion, while the sister’s resolve adds pressure.

Orman suggests a compromise: split the funds, giving Tom part to reduce loans (e.g., $10,000) and using the rest for a home down payment, or letting the investment grow to pay off loans later. A family meeting with Tom, the wife, and the sister could align expectations. The man’s intent isn’t wrong, but transparency with his wife is key.

ADVERTISEMENT

Here’s what Redditors had to say:

Reddit’s dishing out heartfelt takes on this family finance feud—here’s the thoughtful commentary:

NachoPeligroso - NAH. The money was promised to him and you really can’t pull the rug out from under him at this point. I will say I do have a good bit of sympathy for your wife though. If you’re using resources of that level for your brother but not your new immediate family.

ADVERTISEMENT

I think she can very fairly feel as if your priorities are wrong by making this rather grand undertaking for your brother while your own immediate family isn't as financially secure as it should be.. Again, I’m not saying you should renege on your promise. But I can’t call your wife wrong whatsoever.

mynuet - NAH, but why not split it? Tom comes out ahead taking out $20k in loans instead of $40k, and you and your sister both get an infusion of cash to take care of your own needs. It'd require the three of you to sit down and talk about it, but I doubt highly Tom would be happy taking all of the money from you guys while you're struggling.

ADVERTISEMENT

SilverCoins2000 - NAH here, and honestly i kinda feel like the parents are the real TA for bringing yet another child into an already money-tight family.

SpeechIll6025 - NAH, and I disagree with those calling the wife selfish. I think it would be very hard not to feel slighted if your spouse prioritized their sibling over your own kids and future. Will you be able to save for your kids college?

ADVERTISEMENT

If ultimately you give more to your brother than you’ll have for your own kids that might be very hard for your wife (and your kids!) to get over. I think it could seriously impact your relationships long term.

judgmentan - NTA. Keep your promise to your brother. You still have time to save up for the kids and a house. And it certainly won't hurt to have a college graduate in the family who will have access to better job opportunities (as a role model for the kids, for connections for helping you all find a better job through people he knows indirectly, etc.).

ADVERTISEMENT

It's a s**t system, but aside from being born rich/marriage, a marketable college education is the only way to become comfortably middle/upper class. In my experience, having a brother with a good engineering degree from an 'amazing school' is worth more money, and provides more financial security in a tight knit family. Happy to chat over DM about this also.

Meri - NAH. I can see both sides. On the one hand, this was something you and your sister decided to do a long time ago and it’s your money to do what you want with. However, as someone who grew up in a similar financial situation that you’re children are currently in, can you really say you’re doing what’s best for your kids? If it was just you and your wife, I’d say give Tom the money.

ADVERTISEMENT

But you have a child and another on the way and your obligation is to them since you chose to bring them into this world. Either option you choose is fine but you should think about what’s more important: your brother going to college without having to take out student loans, or buying a house for your family to ensure a more secure financial future for your own kids.

StAlvis - INFO. We also struggle with money, but to a lesser extent. With a new baby coming, we'll be just about breaking even every month.. Why have another baby if it would utterly eliminate whatever even moderate financial cushion you were enjoying?. I mean ... that just sounds irresponsible?

Positivear40 - Here’s a suggestion, and this is just under the assumption that 40k is for the total 4 years: tell him to take the loan, let the investment money sit a while longer to collect even more money and then pay his loans off when he finishes. It may not be too much money left over for you guys.

But it would still accumulate maybe another couple thousand to help alleviate some financial stress in the future while still maintaining the promise you made to him. But you need to make sure your wife understands this and is on board with the idea. Also, what if he ends up getting a bigger scholarship next year that helps with his tuition?

ADVERTISEMENT

Another idea is to help his education now, and maybe he can repay some of the money in the future. I wouldn’t say make him pay all of it back or even in one lump sum but hopefully his career prospects is bright and he can help his nephews/nieces in the future the way you and your sister helped in.

To be clear I’m not suggesting using him as a cash cow or anything in the future, but finding a ground where you invest in him and he helps invest in his family WHEN HE CAN, just as you guys are doing. My siblings have helped me a lot growing up, I plan on returning the favor for their own children in the future when I’m able to - family helping family (in a healthy, reasonable way)

ADVERTISEMENT

Cocoasneeze - NAH. But almost Y T A. You have one child, second on the way, snd you barely make even every month. You could give even half of the money to your brother and ease up your immediate family's struggles, the ones you're actually financially and otherwise responsible for. You've got to switch your priorities here.

bbvy24 - YTA. Just because you mentally earmarked this money for Tom doesnt make it his money. It is frankly irresponsible for you to ensure your brother graduates with zero student loans when you cant provide a stable home for your own children. If Tom is 40k short he can borrow some and work part time / summers for the rest.

ADVERTISEMENT

It may seem scary now, but 40k is not a huge amount of money for someone looking down an engineer's future salary. You all need to be realistic about that. You simply _cannot afford_ to give Tom this money. It _will not make a material difference_ to Tom's life in the long run.

It would be easier for him, sure, but _it does not diminish his opportunity set_. It is literally life changing for you own family. It may be the difference between your own kids being able to go to university or not. Step up and act like a father.

ADVERTISEMENT

These responses are as balanced as a budget, seeing both the man’s loyalty and the wife’s practical fears. Can a creative solution bridge this gap, or is one side’s need paramount?

This story of a college fund versus a family home shows how past promises can collide with present realities. The man’s not wrong to want to give his brother a debt-free start—his sacrifice was made before his own family grew—but his wife’s push for their kids’ stability carries equal weight. A compromise, like splitting the funds or delaying the gift to pay loans later, could honor both commitments without breaking the bank or the marriage. Have you ever faced a financial choice between family members? What would you do in this man’s shoes? Share your thoughts below!

ADVERTISEMENT
Share this post
ADVERTISEMENT

Related Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *