AITA For Thinking About Breaking Up After Our ‘Open Relationship’ Experiment Failed miserably?
We all know that moment when you agree to something just to keep the peace, only to realize you’ve signed a contract with your own heartbreak. For one 21-year-old woman, a three-year relationship felt like solid ground until her boyfriend proposed a radical shift in their dynamic. What started as a hesitant 'yes' to an open relationship quickly spiraled into a nightmare of crossed boundaries and emotional neglect.

![My bf [22M] of 3 years asked me [21F] to open the relationship, i agreed to try it out and it was a huge disaster. Although we're back to normal, i am still deeply hurt and i'm considering to break up as i can't emotionally get over it. Am i being exaggerated?](https://en.aubtu.biz/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/art-title-346173.webp)
The cracks begin to show as the narrator reveals that her initial hesitation was met not with caution, but with a complete disregard for her emotional safety.





The emotional weight of the past begins to suffocate the present, highlighting the gap between 'fixing' a problem and truly healing from it.





Updates





The lingering ‘nausea’ described by the narrator is a classic symptom of betrayal trauma, even if the actions were technically ‘permitted’ under a flawed agreement. When a partner dismisses pain as ‘paranoia’ while actively crossing boundaries, it erodes the fundamental sense of safety required for a relationship to thrive. According to Dr. Robert Weiss, Ph.D., an open relationship requires more communication and trust than a monogamous one, not less. When one party uses the ‘open’ label to bypass accountability, it often functions as sanctioned infidelity.
From a psychological standpoint, the narrator isn’t ‘sticking to the past’; she is reacting to a present environment where her past trauma has been minimized rather than integrated. The fact that the boyfriend ‘gets nervous’ and avoids the topic suggests a lack of true emotional restitution.
For a relationship to survive this, the offending partner must be willing to hold space for the victim’s pain for as long as it takes, rather than setting an expiration date on their grief. If the sight of him still being friends with his former lover triggers physical illness, the internal alarm system is doing its job.
I suggest the narrator considers whether she is in love with who he is now, or the memory of who he was before the trust was broken. True reconciliation requires more than just stopping the hurtful behavior; it requires rebuilding the foundation from scratch. Does he seem capable of that work, or is he just waiting for her to ‘get over it’? Invite your own perspective: can a relationship ever truly recover once the ‘monogamy seal’ has been broken against one person’s true wishes?
Community Opinions
The Reddit community was nearly unanimous in their verdict, with many users pointing out that 'opening' a relationship to solve a problem usually just creates a bigger one.















While some urged for therapy, the overwhelming consensus was that the 'nausea' the narrator feels is a permanent signal that the relationship's foundation has turned to dust.
It is clear that while the physical actions of the open relationship have ceased, the emotional fallout continues to haunt the narrator’s daily life. She is caught between her love for the man he claims to be and the reality of the man who ignored her boundaries for his own gratification. Whether this is a ‘mistake’ that can be moved past or a fundamental dealbreaker remains a deeply personal choice, but the physical symptoms of her distress cannot be ignored.
Do you believe a relationship can truly go back to ‘normal’ after boundaries are shattered like this, or is the damage permanent? And if you were in her shoes, would you stay to fight for the love you once had, or leave to protect your peace? Share your hot take below!
