AITA for exposing my sister’s fake messages?

A self-proclaimed cat lady sister loves dishing out pet advice in the family group chat, often guilting siblings into following her views for the “humane” thing to do. One day, she claimed a local vet texted her specific guidance and pasted the message for everyone to see.

Something about it struck one sibling as off too unprofessional, and who really texts their vet like that? A quick Google search revealed the exact “vet text” came from a random 2012 blog post. The sibling screenshotted the proof, dropped it in the chat, and called her out. Chaos ensued, with the family labeling the fact-checker rude and demanding they should’ve kept quiet or gone private.

‘AITA for exposing my sister’s fake messages?’

The suspicion arose during a typical advice session in the sibling group:

My sister is very much a Cat Ladyâ„¢ and will sometimes guilt trip us (other siblings) into doing X or Y because it's the only humane thing to do for...

At some point, she was advising my other sister, mentioning how she "spoke to her local vet" and that her vet texted her something, which she then copy and pasted...

The text message was... Very suspicious to me, and very unprofessional. Also. Who texts their vet??? So I copy and pasted the "vet's text message" on google and LO AND...

the message was from some random 2012 blog about some advice on cats (that my sister obviously agreed with lol). So I screenshotted it, sent it in the group chat,...

My whole family went bonkers and called me an a__hole, saying that I could’ve just let it slide, and that calling her out on her (falsely sourced) “advices” was rude of me.. Should I apologize for calling her out? Because I could have mentioned it in private messages at least.

Sharing pet care tips among family is common, especially with passionate animal lovers. But presenting outdated or unsourced blog content as direct professional advice crosses into misinformation territory—potentially harmful if followed blindly, as veterinary recommendations evolve.

The public call-out might feel embarrassing, but lying to bolster authority in a group discussion invites scrutiny. Family dynamics often amplify reactions; enabling small deceptions can erode trust over time. Communication experts suggest addressing falsehoods factually and calmly, ideally matching the original medium (public post = public correction) to prevent selective narratives.

If the advice wasn’t dangerous, a private heads-up could’ve softened it—but the sister’s pattern of guilting others justifies transparency. Apologizing for tone if it was harsh makes sense, but not for exposing the truth. Moving forward, focusing on reliable sources (like current vet guidelines) benefits everyone, cats included.

ADVERTISEMENT

Here’s the comments of Reddit users:

The crowd mostly backed the exposer, emphasizing the importance of calling out lies, especially on animal care:

pittsburgpam - NTA. People who post false info should be called out on it. She could have just said she found this online and it's good advice. No, she posted...

dvddykvl - NTA . She lied about the source of her information which is already wrong. Plus, depending on the info, could be incorrect and potentially harmful since she said...

ADVERTISEMENT

Santheman0716 - NTA. I would not apologize, all you did was expose your attention-seeking sister. Your family who sided with her are AHoles for encouraging her

medstromx13 - NTA. False information could lead to risks for the cat. It’s honestly kind of wild that everyone said you should let sketchy and false vet advice slide.

Grannywine - NTA, and your families enabling your sisters lying isn't helping matters at all.

ADVERTISEMENT

[Reddit User] - Nope, never apologise for looking out for animals. NTA

[Reddit User] - No, don't apologize. If she wants to lie and claim posts as her own she deserves to be called out. NTA. And no, please don't call people...

Some added humor or deeper thoughts on evolving pet advice:

ADVERTISEMENT

mrschester - NTA. Serving ace ventura pet detective realness

talkmemetome - NTA. Thing is with everything medical the science evolves in time. For example. When I got my first ferret descenting them was the norm

(operating to take out the scent glands) as was neutering them via operation. The life span was known to be 3-5 years and training advice was to flick their noses.

ADVERTISEMENT

Ferrets were described as pretty much tame wild animals who didn't like to be cuddled, it was recommended to cage them and only let out for an hour or two...

These days descenting is pretty much illegal and most (but not all sadly) vets agree that instead of operating to neuter them it is much safer to give them hormone...

Nose flicks are known to be cruel since they have extremely sensitive noses. Life span has miraculously now been agreed to be 5-7 with many living past that.

ADVERTISEMENT

They are also extremely snuggly, gentle and social. Caging is recommended for night time only or if possible not cage them at all and it is known veggies and subpar...

Times change. Old information could just as well be dangerous and all sorts of faking should be called out.

Comedyfish_reddit - Post an apology in the chat but one you found on the internet - preferably one that is suspiciously specific about something unrelated Eg I should probably apologise....

ADVERTISEMENT

I do not think there is a demonstrative proof (like Euclid) of Christianity, nor of the existence of matter, nor of the good will and honesty of my best and...

The case for Christianity in general is well given by Chesterton…As to why God doesn't make it demonstratively clear; are we sure that He is even interested in the kind...

I demand from my friend trust in my good faith which is certain without demonstrative proof. It wouldn't be confidence at all if he waited for rigorous proof.

ADVERTISEMENT

Hang it all, the very fairy-tales embody the truth. Othello believed in Desdemona's innocence when it was proved: but that was too late. Lear believed in Cordelia's love when it...

'His praise is lost who stays till all commend. ' The magnanimity, the generosity which will trust on a reasonable probability, is required of us. But supposing one believed and...

Why, then you would have paid the universe a compliment it doesn't deserve. Your error would even so be more interesting and important than the reality. And yet how could...

ADVERTISEMENT

How could an idiotic universe have produced creatures whose mere dreams are so much stronger, better, subtler than itself?

A few sought more details:

ProbatWork1313 - INFO: what exactly does she feel you and/or your family are doing wrong?

ADVERTISEMENT

Stunning_Grocery8477 - INFO: why did no one else have a problem with the text or the lie? what was the advice, was it unreasonable or just run of the mill?

mandalastar888 - Keeping a cat inside all the time is the best way to protect wildlife and it being a nuisance to neighbours. And if outside put it in an...

I’m actually surprise her argument wasn’t what I said and actually the opposite. I’ve expressed my opinion to my sister a couple of times as her cat roams but that’s...

ADVERTISEMENT

She doesn’t want too so I’m not going to pressure her with my views.

One shared personal experience:

ADVERTISEMENT

Acceptable-Royal-257 - I text my vet for advice- she’s a good friend though!

Exposing a fabricated “expert” message in a group chat might ruffle feathers, but accuracy matters—especially with pet health on the line. The sister could’ve shared the blog honestly without the fake authority boost.

Family siding with the liar over the truth-teller often stems from avoiding conflict, but it enables more fibs down the line. Would you call out a similar lie publicly, go private, or let it go? What’s the wildest “expert advice” you’ve seen faked in a family chat? Spill it below!

ADVERTISEMENT
Share this post

Related Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *