AITA for not attending family events with my in-laws due to no one checking in on me or my family after a tragedy?
What happens when a devastating family tragedy reveals unexpected silence from those closest through marriage? Many people expect in-laws to offer comfort during hardships, stepping up with check-ins or support.
This man withdrew from gatherings after no one in his wife’s large local family ever asked about his father’s severe accident or the toll on his parents and himself. The lack of acknowledgment bred deep hurt, straining his marriage and exposing differing views on empathy and obligation.

‘AITA for not attending family events with my in-laws due to no one checking in on me or my family after a tragedy?’
The devastating accident changed everything for the family a year ago.


Over time, the lack of outreach from the in-laws became impossible to ignore.




One incident in particular highlighted the self-centered attitude.




The withdrawal stems from unmet emotional needs after trauma. Close proximity and frequent gatherings amplified expectations of empathy, yet silence prevailed outside the in-laws’ parents. Perceived avoidance signals dismissal of profound grief.
Both parties navigate discomfort differently. He craves acknowledgment to feel seen amid suffering. The siblings may freeze from uncertainty about broaching pain, fearing intrusion. The sister’s complaint reveals self-focus, exacerbating hurt.
Grief expert Dr. David Kessler explains that “People often avoid grief topics out of fear they’ll say the wrong thing, but silence feels like abandonment” (from Finding Meaning, 2019). Proactive outreach bridges this gap.
Initiate gentle conversations expressing need for check-ins. Suggest therapy for processing resentment. Redirect energy toward supportive networks. Reassess involvement based on reciprocal care.
Here’s the feedback from the Reddit community:
Social media users overwhelmingly validated the man’s hurt feelings in this family support shortfall. They criticized the in-laws’ silence and one sister’s selfishness.
Most declared him not the asshole, matching their low effort with his distance.



Several shared personal experiences or analyzed avoidance patterns.





















A few sought clarification or offered nuanced takes.






This painful silence illustrates how tragedies test relationships beyond blood ties. Expecting basic check-ins reflects reasonable needs for connection, while avoidance often stems from discomfort rather than malice. Protecting emotional well-being sometimes means stepping back from unsupportive circles.
Would you confront in-laws directly about their lack of outreach? When does “not knowing what to say” become an unacceptable excuse for indifference?
