AITAH for not calling off divorce even though my wife has promised me that she will change?
A husband, frustrated by three months of unchanged intimacy issues, decided to pursue divorce after giving his wife an ultimatum to initiate more frequently. Despite her late attempts to improve and emotional pleas, he rejected her efforts, citing a need for personal resolution through divorce. He suggested they could try again post-divorce, potentially remarrying in two to three years if she meets his expectations for their intimate life, sparking a heated confrontation.
This situation questions compatibility and communication in marriage. Is he justified in seeking divorce over unmet needs, or is he too rigid in dismissing her efforts? The online community largely criticized him for his controlling approach and lack of empathy, urging better communication or therapy before such a drastic step. Some supported divorce due to incompatibility but condemned his ultimatums.

‘AITAH for not calling off divorce even though my wife has promised me that she will change?’
The husband issued an ultimatum about their intimate life, with no change.

He informed her of divorce plans; she promised to improve but he didn’t listen.

She attempted intimacy, but he rejected her and removed her from the bedroom.

He insisted on divorce but left open the possibility of remarriage.

He wants divorce for himself but is open to reconciliation later.

This conflict centers on sexual incompatibility and poor marital communication.
Dr. John Gottman, a marriage expert, states, “Ultimatums without empathetic dialogue often erode trust, turning intimacy into a transactional obligation”. The husband’s ultimatum, demanding more initiation without exploring underlying reasons for his wife’s reluctance, likely pressured her into viewing intimacy as a chore, reducing genuine connection. His rejection of her late efforts and conditional remarriage proposal suggest a focus on personal needs over mutual partnership, undermining the emotional bond essential for resolving such issues.
The wife’s forceful attempt at intimacy, while inappropriate, may reflect desperation from his rigid stance. Couples therapy or sex therapy could uncover root causes—stress, emotional disconnect, or medical issues—before resorting to divorce. His remarriage suggestion risks manipulating her emotions, lacking sincerity. A respectful approach, prioritizing mutual understanding, could salvage the relationship or lead to an amicable separation.
Expert Advice: Propose couples therapy to openly discuss intimacy issues and rebuild trust. Avoid ultimatums; instead, explore her perspective on intimacy with empathy. If divorce is inevitable, proceed respectfully without vague promises of remarriage.
Here’s the input from the Reddit crowd:
The community largely criticized the husband for his approach, though some supported divorce.
Most viewed his ultimatums and lack of empathy as inappropriate.








![[Reddit User] − Idk, reading this kind of made me feel really off put. You cannot pressure someone into having s__ with you, maybe there just is not a great...](https://en.aubtu.biz/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/wp-editor-1759042230157-9.webp)

Many called the remarriage suggestion manipulative and unrealistic.




Some recommended therapy to address underlying issues before divorce.



Some agreed divorce is reasonable but criticized his approach.

One user suspected the story might be fabricated.

Some felt his tone suggested aggression or lack of empathy.
![[Reddit User] − I’m going with YTA based on your replies to comments. Looks like you came here looking for a fight and it’s not a stretch to figure that’s...](https://en.aubtu.biz/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/wp-editor-1759042321380-1.webp)
The community mostly viewed the husband as wrong for his controlling and unempathetic approach.
Sexual incompatibility can justify divorce, but ultimatums and poor communication harm both partners. Therapy and empathy are vital before making irreversible decisions. Have you navigated incompatibility in a relationship? How did you address it without causing harm?
