AITA for not letting my aunt and uncle/biological parents call themselves grandparents?

A quiet day with a newborn took a dramatic turn when Jane, the OP’s biological mother, called herself “nanny” to the baby. The OP quickly shut it down, insisting that only Rose, their adoptive mother, deserves that title.

The story pulls you into a tangled web of loyalty, love, and boundaries. Is the OP standing their ground to honor the parents who raised them, or are they being too harsh on their biological parents, John and Jane? Dive into this emotional rollercoaster of a family saga to find out!

‘AITA for not letting my aunt and uncle/biological parents call themselves grandparents?’

To understand the drama, we first need to look at the OP’s unique family history, shaped by adoption and tough choices.

The version without names was really confusing, so I'll call my bio parents "John and Jane" and my adoptive parents "Richard and Rose".

When John and Jane were in uni, Jane got pregnant with me. They couldn't keep me, so Jane turned to my grandparents for help. My grandparents then suggested she talk...

They were planning on 3, but Rose had complications while having the first child (my sister), so they adopted my brother and then they adopted me, too. They've never hidden...

As the OP grew up, their relationship with John and Jane took shape, but not without its challenges.

I feel about John and Jane the same way my brother feels about his bio mum. He had an open adoption, so he also grew up knowing he was adopted,...

When I was 12 or 13, Jane and John had their next child, and 2 more after that, who I view as my siblings, and seeing this Jane and John...

The OP’s wedding became a battleground for family roles, with John and Jane pushing for more than they were given.

When I married my husband, I had a massive argument with John and Jane. I wanted Richard to walk me down the aisle, but John felt he should be the...

ADVERTISEMENT

It escalated from there and ultimately I told John and Jane that they could attend the wedding as guests, nothing more, and if they behaved themselves then we could continue...

Fast forward to the present, where a visit from John and Jane reignited old tensions over family titles.

6 months ago I had a baby. Richard and Rose have visited, met their granddaughter, and my grandparents (Rose and Jane's parents) have also visited, but we've not let extended...

ADVERTISEMENT

They came over for the first time today. John and my husband went into the kitchen and Jane rushes over to the crib, and introduces herself to my daughter as...

I say "you're not her nana, you're her great aunt". Jane says she's my mother, meaning that's her granddaughter. I say Jane is my aunt, that's her great niece. At...

John comes in asking how his "favourite granddaughter" is doing, and I have the same exchange with him as I did with Jane. They get upset and leave. I didn't...

ADVERTISEMENT

Fortunately, Richard and Rose, and their kids, are on my side, but Jane, John, and their 3 kids (all teenagers, my full biological siblings), plus my grandparents, all feel that...

they watched me grow up, tried to be there for me, and I snubbed them both as a teenager and when I got married.. AITA?.

Edit: fucked up my fake names, fixed the post, but any comments mentioning "Rory" mean Richard.

ADVERTISEMENT

When a family title like “grandparent” sparks a heated argument, it raises a bigger question: Does biology automatically grant you a role, or do love and responsibility define family?

The OP’s situation is a tangle of emotions and expectations. By denying John and Jane the title of grandparents, they’re drawing a clear line, honoring Richard and Rose, who raised them with love and care. This choice reflects deep loyalty but also unresolved pain from John and Jane’s decision to give them up years ago. Meanwhile, John and Jane seem eager to reconnect, but their insistence on claiming the grandparent role without the OP’s consent shows a lack of sensitivity to their feelings.

Family therapist Dr. John Gottman notes, “Strong relationships are built on mutual respect and understanding each other’s emotional needs” (The Seven Principles for Making Marriage Work). John and Jane’s actions, from the wedding to the recent visit, suggest they haven’t fully grasped the OP’s perspective.

ADVERTISEMENT

Beyond that, this story highlights a broader social question: how do we navigate roles in blended or adoptive families? The OP has every right to set boundaries, but open communication could ease the tension.

Take a look at the comments from fellow users:

The online community jumped into this family saga with passion, offering a range of takes from fierce support to thoughtful advice. Let’s dive into what they had to say!

These commenters rallied behind the OP, emphasizing that Richard and Rose earned the title of parents—and grandparents—through love and dedication.

ADVERTISEMENT

invisiblebats − NTA - Richard and Rose are your parents. But, it sounds like you have a lot of hurt towards your biological parents. Like, *a lot.

And I wonder if this isn't worth having a discussion with them about that and why, specifically, you don't feel that they get to have the title of grandparents.

Informal-Relation − NTA. They don’t get to enjoy all the perks of being grandparents to your child, when they couldn’t even face the responsibility of raising you. It is your...

ADVERTISEMENT

[Reddit User] − Nta. Point blank. They may have made you. But they are not your parents, ergo they are not your kids grandParents.

Mdame_Invincibl3 − NTA. I always believe that a little bit of baby making juice and a stay inside a person's womb do not make them parents. It's your daughter and...

Rose and Rory have been your parents so they are the once who get to be your kid's grandparents.

ADVERTISEMENT

This group didn’t hold back, criticizing John and Jane for ignoring the OP’s boundaries and acting entitled to roles they didn’t earn.

teresajs − NTA Jane and John can pack sand. They don't get a say because they aren't your parents. Limit your contact with them. Don't allow them to visit your...

WVildandWVonderful − NTA. Of course R and R are the grandparents. J and J could be supportive and have fun as great aunt and great uncle if they cared about...

ADVERTISEMENT

J and J probably would have treated your kids as second-tier grandkids after the kids they raised start having kids anyway.

coldgator − NTA. God your bio parents seem horrible. They were in college, not high school. So they decided it was inconvenient to drop out of school to have a...

They're very lucky that Richard and Rose are such good people and that they allow them to see you. Their behavior at your wedding and with your child is narcissistic...

ADVERTISEMENT

They should absolutely defer to your wishes and to the place of Richard and Rose as your parents. If they don't want to do that, they can get fucked and...

Apprehensive-Mess-97 − NTA - they’re still family, but they made the decision to give up parental rights to your sister. It’s actually insulating to you for them to act pretentious...

I don’t know the reason why they did, but Rory and Rose raised you, they’re the child’s grandparents

ADVERTISEMENT

These commenters brought a lighter touch, mixing humor with suggestions for communication to resolve the conflict.

Molenium − Oof. Your comment about Jane and John not wanting to babysit you as a child makes the rest of the post make a lot more sense (and it...

ADVERTISEMENT

I hope you can talk with them and let them know that, just as how they were not ready to be your parents, you are not ready to have them...

It sounds like they have matured a lot and want to love your child - diminishing that will take away more from your kid than it will punish them, I...

michtttttt − LMAOOO “Get fucked” F**k em. They “watched you grow up”. Oh dang well I’m sorry. My real parents are the ones who don’t raise me, give me up...

ADVERTISEMENT

Oh man, do I need to re-evaluate my whole life and my understanding of what parents are. Blood does not equal family. If you never saw them again, they still...

The online crowd overwhelmingly backs the OP, stressing that family is about love and effort, not just biology. Yet, some thoughtful voices suggest a conversation could pave the way for healing, even if the OP holds the final say.

This story shows that family isn’t just about blood—it’s about who shows up and puts in the work. The OP’s firm stance protects their bond with their adoptive parents, but a little openness might ease the family tension. Sometimes, setting boundaries and having tough talks go hand in hand.

ADVERTISEMENT

What do you think the OP should do next? Should they keep the line firm with John and Jane, or is there room for them to build a relationship with their daughter as great-aunt and great-uncle? Share your thoughts!

Share this post

Related Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *