AITAH for not giving my dads widow/affair partner any of his estate, and evicting her and my half siblings from my childhood home?
Family secrets and fractured relationships often lead to stories that are as painful as they are dramatic. In this post, a 25-year-old woman recounts the fallout from a bitter family dispute over her late father’s estate. After her father’s death—following a tumultuous period marked by his affair with Jenna, who later became his widow—she was left with the bulk of his estate.
The judge ruled against Jenna due to the scandal of her infidelity and the devastating impact it had on her mother’s life. In retaliation, she evicted Jenna and her half-siblings from her childhood home. This decision has ignited fierce debates within her family, leaving many to question whether she is justified in excluding them from her inheritance.
Growing up amid the fallout of her parents’ troubled marriage, she has always felt caught between conflicting loyalties. While some family members see her actions as a necessary stand against a painful past, others argue that her refusal to share the estate or even acknowledge Jenna’s place in the family is harsh. Her story forces us to confront difficult questions about loyalty, accountability, and the enduring scars left by broken families.

‘AITAH for not giving my dads widow/affair partner any of his estate, and evicting her and my half siblings from my childhood home?’




Family therapists emphasize that the repercussions of parental infidelity and its aftermath can ripple through generations, leaving lasting emotional wounds. Dr. Laura Markham, a clinical psychologist and parenting expert, explains, “When a parent’s actions contribute to deep family trauma, the resulting decisions—though painful—can sometimes be a necessary step in reclaiming one’s emotional space.”
In this case, the decision to exclude Jenna and her children from the estate is seen by some experts as a way of drawing firm boundaries against behavior that the poster associates with past suffering.
Dr. Markham further notes, “It is crucial for individuals to take ownership of their emotional well-being, even if that means making difficult choices regarding family inheritance.” While these actions might appear harsh on the surface, they can be viewed as a form of self-protection against further emotional harm.
Additionally, experts stress that transparency and open dialogue are key to resolving family conflicts; however, when long-standing betrayals are involved, as in this case, the path to healing may require setting boundaries that can feel exclusionary. This perspective reinforces the idea that accountability for past actions is essential in moving forward.
Take a look at the comments from fellow users:
The Reddit community largely sided with the poster. Many commenters expressed that Jenna’s actions—keeping her child secret and contributing to a toxic family environment—warranted the consequences she faced. Several users highlighted that infidelity and the resulting trauma should have lasting repercussions, and that the poster’s decision to exclude Jenna from the estate was a justified response to her role in her mother’s tragic death.
Other voices stressed that while family dynamics are complex, she has every right to protect herself from further pain. Overall, the prevailing sentiment was that the poster’s actions, though severe, reflect a long history of unresolved issues, and accountability in such cases is both understandable and necessary.











In conclusion, this story shines a light on the enduring impact of family trauma and the difficult choices that arise from it. The poster’s decision to withhold any inheritance from Jenna and evict her from her childhood home is a stark reminder that sometimes, protecting one’s emotional well-being comes at the cost of family unity.
Do you believe that past betrayals should dictate the distribution of an estate, or should familial ties be preserved regardless of history? How do you think accountability should be balanced with forgiveness in such complex situations? Share your thoughts and experiences below—your perspective might help others navigate the intricate challenges of blended family dynamics and unresolved grief.

Okay, I’ll say screw Jenna wholeheartedly. However your siblings have nothing to do with what their mom did. You may not want any involvement. But consider setting up a trust fund or something of the nature for when they get old enough to access. And literally give any amount that can get them there needs through out the years. It’s up to the mother to make sure she spends it wisely. Let her know it’s not for her but for the kids. And then loose all contact.
Perhaps a locked in fund that Jenna can’t touch. And then, only if OP feels a little forgiving.
In my country, the will would be invalid as soon as he remarried so he would have died intestate. The wife would have gotten 50% of the estate and the remainder would be divided between all his children. At the very least, his estate owes the wife child support.
Karma’s a bitch!!
Good for you! I would have kicked them out!
I have a feeling that if your father had left everything to Jenna, she wouldn’t have given you anything.
why should she reward the person who helped destroy her family. father never unpdated his will. eveidently had no concern for wife future well fare. go on daughter heal yourself and live your life, this wife has nothing coming.
All you telling them to leave the kids something that’s not ops place they have a mama she’s the reason they’re going through what they’re going through
NTA. Is karma coming back at Jenna for being mistress and leading to OPs Mom committing suicide with her words. Dad had 5 years to change the will and life insurance, so sounds like did this on purpose leaving it to OP. Doubt she can’t collect death benefits for her children, and she should get butt working to support herself and kids now
This doesn’t make any sense to me. I know of no country where the wife wouldn’t automatically get the shared assets and be entitled to half the non-shared ones unless a prenup or similar was made, and even then, new kids would change things. It is absolutely bizarre to me that a judge wouldn’t consider the younger siblings, who did not exist when the first will was made, just because the marriage started out as an affair.
Regardless, everyone is blaming the wrong person. The dad is the pos. This country is not nice to unmarried pregnant women or single mothers, so I imagine she had very, very few options other than to try to expose and shame the dad into providing support, with the unintended result of his wife killing herself. She already got her karma in the form of a garbage husband who resented and wanted to abandon her and their child; being impoverished on top of that is just being vindictive.
Absolutely the ass. Yeah your father screwed up, but so did your mom with her solution. But even if you don’t like it these children are your siblings, through no fault of theirs.
Least you could do is set up a trust for them. If your father had the money he should have changed the will to include them, but it had only been 5 years. He was responsible for his actions. He was the person in authority seducing the younger woman. I bet with adultery being the huge deal in your country means your Christian, but none of this sounds Christian to me.