WIBTA if I deducted the cost of an expensive item my friend ruined from her pay?
A quiet week away turned into a whirlwind of betrayal for one homeowner, whose trust in a close friend unraveled faster than a poorly stitched seam. Picture a cozy home, a fluffy dog named Dana, and a friend, Bex, hired to keep things in order. What should’ve been a simple housesitting gig morphed into a saga of broken boundaries and a pricey duvet casualty. The homeowner’s frustration is palpable—how do you handle a friend who treats your home like a free-for-all Airbnb?
The stakes climb higher when Bex’s carelessness leaves a $250 duvet splattered with red nail polish, sparking a heated dispute over payment. With emotions running high and mutual friends picking sides, this tale of trust gone awry hooks readers with its relatable mix of friendship, responsibility, and the cost of mistakes.

‘WIBTA if I deducted the cost of an expensive item my friend ruined from her pay?’


















Trusting a friend to care for your home can feel like handing over the keys to your sanctuary—only to find it treated like a frat house. The homeowner’s clash with Bex highlights a classic issue: blurred lines in personal and professional agreements. According to Psychology Today, friendships often falter when expectations aren’t clearly defined, especially in paid arrangements. Bex’s decision to sleep in the off-limits master bedroom and her neglect of Dana reflect a disregard for boundaries that’s all too common.
Dr. Irene Levine, a friendship expert quoted in Psychology Today, notes, “Trust is the foundation of any relationship, and violating it can cause irreparable damage.” Here, Bex’s actions—ignoring the guest room rule, damaging property, and skipping dog walks—erode that trust. Her defense, claiming the duvet damage was a minor accident, misses the point: respect for the homeowner’s space was non-negotiable.
This situation taps into a broader issue: the risks of mixing friendship with business. A 2019 study from Harvard Business Review found that 58% of workplace friendships involving financial transactions face strain due to unmet expectations. The homeowner’s instinct to deduct the $250 duvet cost from Bex’s $350 payment aligns with fairness, as Bex breached the agreement. However, deducting the full amount might escalate tensions. A practical solution? Offer Bex the chance to cover cleaning costs or replace the duvet, preserving some goodwill while addressing the damage.
For the homeowner, setting firm boundaries in future arrangements is key. Clear contracts, even with friends, can prevent such messes. Readers, take note: always spell out expectations to avoid a duvet-sized disaster.
Here’s the feedback from the Reddit community:
The Reddit crew didn’t hold back, dishing out opinions as spicy as a backyard barbecue. From calling Bex out for neglecting Dana to slamming her boundary-stomping antics, the community brought the heat. Here’s the unfiltered scoop from the crowd:















These Redditors tore into Bex’s behavior, with some suggesting zero payment for her “lounging” and others backing a partial deduction. Their outrage over Dana’s missed walks and Bex’s indoor pot-smoking added fuel to the fire. But do these fiery takes capture the full story, or are they just fanning the flames of drama?
This housesitting horror story leaves us pondering trust, accountability, and the price of a good duvet. The homeowner’s frustration is relatable—who hasn’t felt the sting of a friend’s carelessness? Deducting the duvet cost seems fair, but navigating the fallout with mutual friends adds a layer of complexity. Bex’s explosive reaction and group chat meltdown only deepen the divide. What would you do if you found yourself in this homeowner’s shoes? Share your thoughts and experiences in the comments below!

If Bex did feed and water Dana, cleaned up dog poop and kept the dog company, that is still worth something. $100 would be fair compensation. The whole thing about the duvet cover is a trust thing over her decison to use the master instead of the guest room as is the pot smoking indoors. I would not hold her to the $250 for the duvet cover but make it clear that you are only compensating for what she actually performed. The violation of trust and the monetary value of the duvet cover are two separate issues. The violation of trust is the bigger issue and it is being lost in the monetary issue.