AITA for declining to participate in a “meal train” for a woman with an able bodied husband and adult son living with her?

Picture a church group chat buzzing with pleas for a meal train, a sweet gesture to feed a recovering member. But for one busy woman, the latest request—for a lady named Sue, laid up with back pain—didn’t sit right. Sue’s got a husband and grown son at home, both perfectly capable of wielding a spatula. So, she politely declined to cook, expecting the men to step up. Cue the drama: a friend called, dripping with guilt, and her own husband hinted she could’ve been “nicer.”

Was she wrong to skip the meal train, or is it fair to question why the men aren’t pitching in? Reddit’s got a lot to say, and this tale of community pressure and gender roles is cooking up a storm.

‘AITA for declining to participate in a “meal train” for a woman with an able bodied husband and adult son living with her?’

So some ladies in our church occasionally send out invites for 'meal trains' for people to sign up to bring meals for someone who recently had a baby or is sick or something like that. I get it. It's a nice idea to help people out. I have no problem and have participated sometimes in the past.

ADVERTISEMENT

Last week a meal train was posted for a lady named 'Sue' (name changed obviously) who apparently had spent a few days in the hospital due to severe back pain. She's home now but still in pain and unable to do much. The meal signup stated about bringing a meal for 3 people. Sue lives with her husband and adult son. The husband and son work full time. Sue does not work.

I decided not to sign up for this meal train because I also work full time. I figured if people want to, that's fine, but I don't have extra time to be cooking meals for people who have capable adults in the household to help out. Some people do have extra time, and that's great if they want to help out.

Well, I'm guessing others felt this way too because the meal train just wasn't filling up very fast so they kept posting about it and posting about it. I kept ignoring it. Last night I got a call from a friend of Sue's. We'll call her Jane. Jane asked if I was aware that Sue had been in the hospital and if I could possibly sign up for a meal slot.

ADVERTISEMENT

I explained very nicely to Jane that I work full time and I don't often have time to make a full meal and that my husband and I usually just get our own meals or one of us cooks when we're able. She was like, 'Oh well that's ok. There are plenty of weekend slots availble too that you could sign up for when you're not working.' I said, 'Well, aren't her husband and son home on the weekends?

Couldn't they cook then?' Jane got really snippy with me then and cut the conversation short. I told my husband about it and he thinks that I could have made time on the weekend to cook something and take it over just to be nice. I asked him why didn't he sign up then if he thought the needed meals on the weekend and he told me I was just trying to start an argument.

I don't think I'm the AH because Sue's husband and grown son should be perfectly capable of cooking for Sue and themselves, especially on the weekend. But I might be the AH because I don't have much going on during the weekends and I COULD cook for them. I just don't see the need to.. So.........reddit.......AITA?

ADVERTISEMENT

Declining a meal train shouldn’t spark a feud, but this woman’s choice did. Sue’s back pain is real, but with two able-bodied men in her home, the woman saw no need to cook for them. Her logic? They can handle meals. Yet, Jane’s guilt-trip call and her husband’s nudge to “be nice” suggest she’s bucking an unspoken rule: women should always step up.

This situation screams gender bias. The woman’s refusal challenges why meal trains often target women, ignoring men’s role in caregiving. A 2020 study found 70% of household cooking falls to women, even in dual-income homes (source). Sue’s husband and son, both working full-time, aren’t exempt from pitching in.

Dr. John Gottman, a relationship expert, notes, “Equity in household tasks strengthens family bonds and challenges outdated gender norms” (source). Here, the woman’s stance pushes back on enabling Sue’s family to dodge responsibility. Jane’s snippiness and the husband’s deflection—she’s “starting an argument”—show discomfort with her boundary.

ADVERTISEMENT

Here’s the input from the Reddit crowd:

Reddit didn’t hold back, dishing out fiery takes on this meal train mess. Here’s the community’s unfiltered feedback:

Beck2010 − Next phone call you get from Jane or someone else about this (and you will), ask if they’ve reached out to any men to contribute or if it’s just women who are expected to cook and provide food.. NTA.

ResponseMountain6580 − NTA everyday sexism in action.

ADVERTISEMENT

ResponsibleSpite1332 − NTA. Why is everyone in this story so misogynistic? Not one of the three men mentioned can cook?

Aggressive-Mind-2085 − NTA. ​ ' I told my husband about it and he thinks that I could have made time on the weekend to cook something and take it over just to be nice.' .. **Why doesn't YOUR AH HUSBAND make time on the weekend to cook something and take it over just to be nice? Please ask him, and post the answer.**

sagen11 − NTA *'I asked him why didn't he sign up then if he thought the needed meals on the weekend and he told me I was just trying to start an argument.'* F**k. That. Noise. No you were not, you were making a valid and completely obvious point that he did not want to acknowledge. Men *are just as capable as women* at making meals.  Sue does not need a meal train from friends/acquaintances period.

ADVERTISEMENT

Sue needs the two adult men who live with her to step up and f**king help. There is no amount of attempted guilt/shaming in the world that would get me to do the work that two grown men should be doing for ***their*** mum/wife.. In fact I would view signing up for the meal train to be enablement of their disgraceful behaviour.

8512764EA − You should have signed up your husband, her husband, and her adult son to weekend slots. NTA

hausofmc − NTA. How very Christian to call someone up to shame, guilt and manipulate them into something that is “voluntary” reminds me of growing up in the Catholic Church

ADVERTISEMENT

ErikaWasTaken − NTA. This doesn’t feel like what meal trains/support systems are meant for. Yes, it totally sucks for Sue because back injuries are horrible. But meal trains are usually because the entire family is consumed by grief or focused on managing the illness/crises. There is no reason the husband and son can’t manage meals for a few days.. It also feels really gross that Jane is calling around and asking people to participate.

an0nym0uswr1ter − NTA. So if you do it then it's all good, but husband won't do it and you're starting a fight? Nope. I also would not volunteer when there are 2 full abled adults in the house. The microwave is a neat new tool that people who can't cook real good can use.

beckatcat − NTA. These are supposed to be voluntary, like if you don’t want to or just can’t it should be fine. Is it nice, sure, but it’s not required. And if your husband thinks you should be guilted into volunteering, he probably has time and can do it instead or as well.

ADVERTISEMENT

And this isn’t a case of both parents needing to take care of a newborn. I’m sure her husband and son are perfectly able of making some kind of food on the weekends or meal prep for the week a bit.

These opinions are bold, but do they cut to the heart of the issue or just stir the pot?

This meal train drama serves up a bitter truth: old-school gender roles still simmer beneath community kindness. The woman’s refusal to cook for Sue’s family wasn’t about cruelty—it was a stand for fairness. Why should women bear the load when capable men are in the house? Her choice sparked snark and shade, but it’s a question worth asking. Would you sign up for the meal train or tell Sue’s men to grab a cookbook? Jump in below and let’s dish!

ADVERTISEMENT
Share this post

Related Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *